Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Breakthrough case close to home

Breakthrough case close to home

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
29 Posts 18 Posters 449 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    He’s going for a rapid PCR today at 2:30. I’m fine he seems over it. I’m still avoiding him until I get a negative PCR from him. Monday at 2:30 I’ll have my 6th vaccine.

    "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
    -Cormac McCarthy

    LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

      He’s going for a rapid PCR today at 2:30. I’m fine he seems over it. I’m still avoiding him until I get a negative PCR from him. Monday at 2:30 I’ll have my 6th vaccine.

      LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins Dad
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      @jon-nyc said in Breakthrough case close to home:

      He’s going for a rapid PCR today at 2:30. I’m fine he seems over it. I’m still avoiding him until I get a negative PCR from him. Monday at 2:30 I’ll have my 6th vaccine.

      Are you eligible for that prophylactic that Jolly posted last week?

      The Brad

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nyc
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        I haven’t checked but I doubt it. I will have no trouble getting the one working monoclonal antibody treatment if I actually test positive and I know to do it early. Hopefully it won’t come to that.

        "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
        -Cormac McCarthy

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jodiJ Offline
          jodiJ Offline
          jodi
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          Nothing useful to add, (though we’ve had two nasty respiratory virus go through our house lately that, according to multiple tests, are not Covid), anyway - thinking about you and hoping it’s not Covid!

          1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
            #25

            He was PCR negative today. It’s either gone or the 12/26 test was a false positive. The former is more likely, the home test he used has a 98+% specificity, 86%. IOW, false positives are much less common than false negatives, by 7-10x.

            "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
            -Cormac McCarthy

            JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
            • LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins Dad
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              Great news! When is your next PCR?

              The Brad

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by
                #27

                No thought of having one unless I get symptoms. I have a booster scheduled Monday and an antibody test 2 weeks later.

                "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
                -Cormac McCarthy

                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                  He was PCR negative today. It’s either gone or the 12/26 test was a false positive. The former is more likely, the home test he used has a 98+% specificity, 86%. IOW, false positives are much less common than false negatives, by 7-10x.

                  JollyJ Offline
                  JollyJ Offline
                  Jolly
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #28

                  @jon-nyc said in Breakthrough case close to home:

                  He was PCR negative today. It’s either gone or the 12/26 test was a false positive. The former is more likely, the home test he used has a 98+% specificity, 86%. IOW, false positives are much less common than false negatives, by 7-10x.

                  Likelihood of 12/26 being a false positive is remote. He had Omicron. And cleared it really fast.

                  Now, what I don't have a clue about, is the viability of Omicron on fomites.

                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                  jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  • JollyJ Jolly

                    @jon-nyc said in Breakthrough case close to home:

                    He was PCR negative today. It’s either gone or the 12/26 test was a false positive. The former is more likely, the home test he used has a 98+% specificity, 86%. IOW, false positives are much less common than false negatives, by 7-10x.

                    Likelihood of 12/26 being a false positive is remote. He had Omicron. And cleared it really fast.

                    Now, what I don't have a clue about, is the viability of Omicron on fomites.

                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #29

                    @jolly said in Breakthrough case close to home:

                    @jon-nyc said in Breakthrough case close to home:

                    He was PCR negative today. It’s either gone or the 12/26 test was a false positive. The former is more likely, the home test he used has a 98+% specificity, 86%. IOW, false positives are much less common than false negatives, by 7-10x.

                    Likelihood of 12/26 being a false positive is remote. He had Omicron. And cleared it really fast.

                    Yeah that seems the most likely explanation

                    "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
                    -Cormac McCarthy

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • Users
                    • Groups