The Wedding Photographer
-
Because they want an anomaly to be accepted as normal.
Sorry, they ain't normal.
-
@jolly said in The Wedding Photographer:
Because they want an anomaly to be accepted as normal.
Swing and a miss, I'd say. This is about their side (the Right Side) winning against the other side (the Nazi side).
If it were about anything else they'd simply find someone who wants to do the job, to do the job.
And yes this is beyond wrong. Compelled work from what's basically a freelance business? What the fuck is this?
Please love yourself.
-
@george-k said in The Wedding Photographer:
Before you know it, bakers will be forced to make wedding cakes.
Like Mik said, how do you define "forced to make a wedding cake." Because I gauranfreakingtee you that there are endlessly creative ways to stay within the parameters of the court order and still render the final product useless. This is 8 years of restaurant experience talking here, trust me on this.
If they want to kick this particular stupid can down the road be my guest. No mindsets will be changed and no forward social progress will ever be made.
-
@jolly said in The Wedding Photographer:
Because they want an anomaly to be accepted as normal.
Swing and a miss, I'd say. This is about their side (the Right Side) winning against the other side (the Nazi side).
If it were about anything else they'd simply find someone who wants to do the job, to do the job.
And yes this is beyond wrong. Compelled work from what's basically a freelance business? What the fuck is this?
@aqua-letifer said in The Wedding Photographer:
@jolly said in The Wedding Photographer:
Because they want an anomaly to be accepted as normal.
Swing and a miss, I'd say. This is about their side (the Right Side) winning against the other side (the Nazi side).
If it were about anything else they'd simply find someone who wants to do the job, to do the job.
And yes this is beyond wrong. Compelled work from what's basically a freelance business? What the fuck is this?
No, I think the drive to be "right" is rooted in the need to be accepted.
-
Businesses should be free to decide with whom they want to do business. If they only want to do business with black plumbers who weigh more than 200 pounds, fine with me. The "gay vs Christian" thing isn't relevant IMO.
@klaus said in The Wedding Photographer:
Businesses should be free to decide with whom they want to do business. If they only want to do business with black plumbers who weigh more than 200 pounds, fine with me.
There was a lawyer on this forum, a long time ago, who explained that refusing business to a "protected class" (ie black people, women, etc) was a civil rights violation. Gay people fell under that umbrella as well.
-
@klaus said in The Wedding Photographer:
Businesses should be free to decide with whom they want to do business. If they only want to do business with black plumbers who weigh more than 200 pounds, fine with me.
There was a lawyer on this forum, a long time ago, who explained that refusing business to a "protected class" (ie black people, women, etc) was a civil rights violation. Gay people fell under that umbrella as well.
@george-k said in The Wedding Photographer:
protected class
Well, that's the problem right there. The problem is not the selection of protected classes. The problem is the idea of protected classes itself. If there's one freedom that counts for something, it's freedom of association.
-
@george-k said in The Wedding Photographer:
protected class
Well, that's the problem right there. The problem is not the selection of protected classes. The problem is the idea of protected classes itself. If there's one freedom that counts for something, it's freedom of association.
@klaus said in The Wedding Photographer:
freedom of association
I think the problem there is mostly public vs private.
As a private person, you can hate anyone you want for any reason you want. For example, I think most people in this country now privately, and publicly, hate white people.
Public accommodations are a different matter.
And protected classes are also, in my opinion, poorly defined. Basically anyone can join a protected class at will. That is senseless.
-
@george-k said in The Wedding Photographer:
protected class
Well, that's the problem right there. The problem is not the selection of protected classes. The problem is the idea of protected classes itself. If there's one freedom that counts for something, it's freedom of association.
@klaus said in The Wedding Photographer:
@george-k said in The Wedding Photographer:
protected class
Well, that's the problem right there. The problem is not the selection of protected classes. The problem is the idea of protected classes itself. If there's one freedom that counts for something, it's freedom of association.
What is "protected class"?
https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-protected-class-4583111In Germany, do you have anti-discrimination laws that say a private business cannot refuse to serve a prospective customer for the sole reason that he is, say, a Jew? Would you consider a law that would, in effect, prohibits professional wedding photographers from refusing to photograph weddings of Jewish couples to be antithetical to "freedom of association"?
-
@klaus said in The Wedding Photographer:
@george-k said in The Wedding Photographer:
protected class
Well, that's the problem right there. The problem is not the selection of protected classes. The problem is the idea of protected classes itself. If there's one freedom that counts for something, it's freedom of association.
What is "protected class"?
https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-protected-class-4583111In Germany, do you have anti-discrimination laws that say a private business cannot refuse to serve a prospective customer for the sole reason that he is, say, a Jew? Would you consider a law that would, in effect, prohibits professional wedding photographers from refusing to photograph weddings of Jewish couples to be antithetical to "freedom of association"?
@axtremus said in The Wedding Photographer:
In Germany, do you have anti-discrimination laws that say a private business cannot refuse to serve a prospective customer for the sole reason that he is, say, a Jew? Would you consider a law that would, in effect, prohibits professional wedding photographers from refusing to photograph weddings of Jewish couples to be antithetical to "freedom of association"?
I'm not a lawyer, but I assume it would be illegal.
And yes, even though I would consider that photographer to be an asshole, I consider the illegality to be antithetical to "freedom of association".
-
I don't even consider the photographer to be an asshole. I wouldn't ask a Muslim or Jewish caterer to serve roast pig at a reception. So if I was gay/queer/lesbian/transgendered/marrying my german shepard, I wouldn't ask a Christian photographer to work the wedding.
-
I don't even consider the photographer to be an asshole. I wouldn't ask a Muslim or Jewish caterer to serve roast pig at a reception. So if I was gay/queer/lesbian/transgendered/marrying my german shepard, I wouldn't ask a Christian photographer to work the wedding.
@jolly said in The Wedding Photographer:
I wouldn't ask a Muslim or Jewish caterer to serve roast pig at a reception.
THere's more than one video of a guy asking a Muslim to make a gay wedding cake - and being denied.
It's odd how those "crimes" never get prosecuted isn't it?
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
@jolly said in The Wedding Photographer:
I don't even consider the photographer to be an asshole. I wouldn't ask a Muslim or Jewish caterer to serve roast pig at a reception.
Difference there is that “pig” is not in a “protected class”, so a caterer refusing to roast a pig is not considered discriminatory. This is like a professional photographer who takes only black and white photographs refusing to take color photographs. “Color photography” is not in a “protected class” so a professional photographer can refuse to take color photographs without running afoul of anti-discrimination statutes.
-
@jolly said in The Wedding Photographer:
I wouldn't ask a Muslim or Jewish caterer to serve roast pig at a reception.
THere's more than one video of a guy asking a Muslim to make a gay wedding cake - and being denied.
It's odd how those "crimes" never get prosecuted isn't it?
@george-k said in The Wedding Photographer:
THere's more than one video of a guy asking a Muslim to make a gay wedding cake - and being denied.
It's odd how those "crimes" never get prosecuted isn't it?
The original lawsuit against the New York photographer was brought on as a civil suit, no? You use “crime” in quotes but it was initially a civilian who initiated a civil lawsuit, not a state initiating a criminal prosecution. Whoever participated in and/or created a video showing a Muslim baker refusing to make a gay wedding cake could have brought a civil lawsuit against that baker, no? If the civilian is not serious enough to file a lawsuit, then there is no lawsuit.
-
@jolly said in The Wedding Photographer:
I don't even consider the photographer to be an asshole. I wouldn't ask a Muslim or Jewish caterer to serve roast pig at a reception.
Difference there is that “pig” is not in a “protected class”, so a caterer refusing to roast a pig is not considered discriminatory. This is like a professional photographer who takes only black and white photographs refusing to take color photographs. “Color photography” is not in a “protected class” so a professional photographer can refuse to take color photographs without running afoul of anti-discrimination statutes.
@axtremus said in The Wedding Photographer:
@jolly said in The Wedding Photographer:
I don't even consider the photographer to be an asshole. I wouldn't ask a Muslim or Jewish caterer to serve roast pig at a reception.
Difference there is that “pig” is not in a “protected class”, so a caterer refusing to roast a pig is not considered discriminatory. This is like a professional photographer who takes only black and white photographs refusing to take color photographs. “Color photography” is not in a “protected class” so a professional photographer can refuse to take color photographs without running afoul of anti-discrimination statutes.
Uh, no. The caterer provides food for a wedding or other event. How can he refuse to provide the food requested?
-
@axtremus said in The Wedding Photographer:
@jolly said in The Wedding Photographer:
I don't even consider the photographer to be an asshole. I wouldn't ask a Muslim or Jewish caterer to serve roast pig at a reception.
Difference there is that “pig” is not in a “protected class”, so a caterer refusing to roast a pig is not considered discriminatory. This is like a professional photographer who takes only black and white photographs refusing to take color photographs. “Color photography” is not in a “protected class” so a professional photographer can refuse to take color photographs without running afoul of anti-discrimination statutes.
Uh, no. The caterer provides food for a wedding or other event. How can he refuse to provide the food requested?
@jolly said in The Wedding Photographer:
The caterer provides food for a wedding or other event. How can he refuse to provide the food requested?
For example, there are no lack of “vegetarian only” catering businesses and it is legal and commonly accepted that they can refuse to provide meat. It’s actually not that different from a restaurant refusing to serve food outside of dishes listed in their menu. Caterers too can restrict what they serve to dishes listed in their published menus.
