Jussie Smollett's trial
-
@kluurs said in Jussie Smollett's trial:
President Donald Trump on Thursday called the attack on “Empire” star Jussie Smollett “horrible,” condemning the assault by individuals who the actor alleged referenced the president’s campaign slogan as they attacked him.
“It doesn’t get worse, as far as I’m concerned,” Trump said of the attack during an Oval Office exchange with the White House press pool on Thursday.
Yeah, but everybody knows Trump didn't really mean it, so he's in the clear for being gullible
-
FFS
https://chicago.suntimes.com/2022/3/16/22981990/jussie-smollett-jail-release-appeal-fake-hate-crime
Jussie Smollett will be released from jail while he appeals his conviction for faking a 2019 hate crime, an appeals court ordered Wednesday.
The action by a three-judge panel of the First District Court of Appeals comes just six days after the actor was sentenced to five months behind bars. Smollett’s attorneys filed their appeal the same day.
The court found that “the defendant has been convicted of non-violent offenses and that this court will be unable to dispose of the instant appeal before the defendant would have served his entire sentence of incarceration,” the order drafted by appellate justices Thomas E. Hoffman and Joy Cunningham states. “It is hereby ordered that the motion of the defendant, Jussie Smollett, to stay his sentence of incarceration and to grant him a bond pending the disposition of his appeal or until further order of this court is granted.”
Appellate Justice Maureen Connors dissented, stating only, “I dissent and would deny this motion.”
The actor previously spent a few hours in jail following his arraignment in 2019.
The actor will not have to post cash bond to secure his release.
In a text message Wednesday, Smollett’s attorney, Nenye Uche said he expected the actor to be released and planned a press conference for outside the jail at 7:30 p.m.
The Cook County Sheriff’s Office had not yet received an order from the court, and had not begun processing Smollett’s release, spokesman Matt Walberg said.
The actor has been held in “protective custody,” away from other inmates since he was taken to the jail following his sentencing hearing, where the actor loudly proclaimed his innocence and that he was not suicidal.
Smollett’s lawyers had challenged his conviction on five counts of disorderly conduct in post-trial motions and in a brief notice of appeal, offering up a grocery lists of issues with the actor’s case. Judge James Linn last week ordered Smollett to begin a 30-month period of probation with five months in jail, and to pay $120,000 in restitution to the city of Chicago.
Smollett was likely to have served only half the 150-day sentence, as the jail term is eligible for “day-for-day” credit for good behavior.
Among the issues raised by Smollett’s lawyers were arguments that the charges brought against Smollett by Special Prosecutor Dan Webb were double jeopardy, since Smollett had struck an unorthodox deal with State’s Attorney Kim Foxx’s office to drop the charges in exchange for the actor forfeiting the $10,000 bond he posted after his 2019 arrest and performing community service, and complaints about the jury selection process and jury instructions.
-
-
-
-
Attorneys for Jussie Smollett filed arguments Wednesday explaining why they’re appealing the former “Empire” actor’s 2021 hate crime hoax conviction and want a new trial.
The court document, filed Wednesday in the Illinois First Judicial District appellate court, raises multiple arguments, including that Smollett’s prosecution violated his due process rights, in part by not enforcing what his attorneys describe as a binding non-prosecution agreement.
Smollett also argues that he was subjected to double jeopardy, takes issue with the appointment of a special prosecutor and argues his sentence was excessive, among other things.
Smollett’s attorneys are requesting in the appeal that he get a new trial with a different judge.
One of their arguments involves double jeopardy; they say he was charged twice for the same crimes.
In their appeal, his attorneys wrote, “If Mr. Smollett’s convictions are allowed to stand, this case will set a dangerous precedent by giving prosecutors a second bite at the apple any time there is dissatisfaction with another prosecutor’s exercise of discretion,” they wrote.
-
@George-K said in Jussie Smollett's trial:
But, bless them for doing God's work. The "noogie" sealed the deal.
I don't remember seeing that, but that was funny
-
An appeals court upheld the disorderly conduct convictions Friday of actor Jussie Smollett, who was accused of staging a racist, homophobic attack against himself in 2019 and lying about it to Chicago police.
Smollett, who appeared in the TV show “Empire,” challenged the role of a special prosecutor, jury selection, evidence and many other aspects of the case. But all were turned aside in a 2-1 opinion from the Illinois Appellate Court.
He now will have to finish a 150-day stint in jail that was part of his sentence. Smollett spent just six days in jail while his appeal was pending.
-
[copper]
Lock him up.
[/copper]
That said, and this is Chicago politics, the current Cook County prosecutor, Kim Foxx, has a storied history of being...unfair in her sentencing suggestions and decisions to prosecute. I think she recommended dropping charges against Smollett.
-
I posted about this about a week ago. I was surprised how little attention it got.
-
The Illinois Supreme Court has thrown out former "Empire" actor Jussie Smollett’s conviction for lying about a 2019 hate crime.
Smollett was found guilty in 2021 for faking a racist and homophobic attack and lying to the police. His lawyers said this violated his Fifth Amendment rights because, in 2019, Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx had already agreed to drop the charges if Smollett paid $10,000 and did community service. A special prosecutor later charged him again, leading to his trial and conviction.
In its decision, filed on Thursday, the court stated they are resolving a "question about the State’s responsibility to honor the agreements it makes with defendants."
The court stated it did not find that the state could bring a second prosecution against Smollett after the initial charges were dismissed as part of an agreement and the actor performed the terms of the agreement, noting that Illinois case law establishes that it is "fundamentally unfair to allow the prosecution to renege on a deal with a defendant when the defendant has relied on the agreement to his detriment."
"We are aware that this case has generated significant public interest and that many people were dissatisfied with the resolution of the original case and believed it to be unjust. Nevertheless, what would be more unjust than the resolution of any one criminal case would be a holding from this court that the State was not bound to honor agreements upon which people have detrimentally relied," it said.