So Aqua….
-
Where are you guys moving? You’ve mentioned that you guys were researching school districts and the like, but this is the first that you have mentioned the house being on the market… That tells me you’ve settled on an area…
-
Where are you guys moving? You’ve mentioned that you guys were researching school districts and the like, but this is the first that you have mentioned the house being on the market… That tells me you’ve settled on an area…
@lufins-dad said in So Aqua….:
Where are you guys moving? You’ve mentioned that you guys were researching school districts and the like, but this is the first that you have mentioned the house being on the market… That tells me you’ve settled on an area…
Yeah that's another big ol' pffffft. We have indeed settled on an area, but a ton of shit has gone down over the past week, so I don't think we're going anywhere for some time.
But basically we were looking at Calvert County, MD. Farms and shit. Less crazy people.
Please love yourself.
-
@lufins-dad said in So Aqua….:
Where are you guys moving? You’ve mentioned that you guys were researching school districts and the like, but this is the first that you have mentioned the house being on the market… That tells me you’ve settled on an area…
Yeah that's another big ol' pffffft. We have indeed settled on an area, but a ton of shit has gone down over the past week, so I don't think we're going anywhere for some time.
But basically we were looking at Calvert County, MD. Farms and shit. Less crazy people.
-
@aqua-letifer said in So Aqua….:
Lesscrazy people.[Aqua}
"Fewer"
[/Aqua]
Someone had to, right?
The less refers to the level of craziness, not the number of people. So if anything it should be "less-crazy."
Do not cite the deep grammar to me, jackass. I was there when it was written.
-
@aqua-letifer said in So Aqua….:
Lesscrazy people.[Aqua}
"Fewer"
[/Aqua]
Someone had to, right?
The less refers to the level of craziness, not the number of people. So if anything it should be "less-crazy."
Do not cite the deep grammar to me, jackass. I was there when it was written.
@aqua-letifer said in So Aqua….:
The less refers to the level of craziness, not the number of people. So if anything it should be "less-crazy."
Fair enough.
Still ambiguous, as you admit: "it should be 'less-crazy.'"
A more clear statement would have, of course, been; "saner people," or "more sane people."
Do not cite the deep grammar to me, jackass. I was there when it was written.
And that was, when, exactly? The 15th century?
-
@aqua-letifer said in So Aqua….:
The less refers to the level of craziness, not the number of people. So if anything it should be "less-crazy."
Fair enough.
Still ambiguous, as you admit: "it should be 'less-crazy.'"
A more clear statement would have, of course, been; "saner people," or "more sane people."
Do not cite the deep grammar to me, jackass. I was there when it was written.
And that was, when, exactly? The 15th century?
@aqua-letifer said in So Aqua….:
The less refers to the level of craziness, not the number of people. So if anything it should be "less-crazy."
Fair enough.
Still ambiguous, as you admit: "it should be 'less-crazy.'"
So recognized.
A more clear statement would have, of course, been; "saner people," or "more sane people."
Less crazy doesn't mean the same as more sane.
Do not cite the deep grammar to me, jackass. I was there when it was written.
And that was, when, exactly? The 15th century?
Dude, c'mon. Narnia?
Narnia.
-
@aqua-letifer said in So Aqua….:
The less refers to the level of craziness, not the number of people. So if anything it should be "less-crazy."
Fair enough.
Still ambiguous, as you admit: "it should be 'less-crazy.'"
So recognized.
A more clear statement would have, of course, been; "saner people," or "more sane people."
Less crazy doesn't mean the same as more sane.
Do not cite the deep grammar to me, jackass. I was there when it was written.
And that was, when, exactly? The 15th century?
Dude, c'mon. Narnia?
Narnia.
