Steele's Source
-
And people at the network wonder why people don't trust them.
Look the Hunter Biden story and voter polls. 14% of Biden voters would not have voted for him if they had known the Hunter story. But if you were a MSM viewer, the only thing you would have heard, if anything, was that the story was highly dubious and possible information.
-
And here we are, eight hours later.
Remember, Buzzfeed is the outlet that "leaked" the dossier.
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
And here we are, eight hours later.
Remember, Buzzfeed is the outlet that "leaked" the dossier.
@george-k said in Steele's Source:
And here we are, eight hours later.
Remember, Buzzfeed is the outlet that "leaked" the dossier.
This is outrageous.
By all that's Holy, regulate those suckers like a public utility. And before the little, squint-eyed bastard gives me that "go build your own speech", we're waaay past that point. Probably be easier to build your own nuclear power plant.
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Warning: I post things that interest me. Read and comment at your own discretion.
-
@george-k said in Steele's Source:
And here we are, eight hours later.
Remember, Buzzfeed is the outlet that "leaked" the dossier.
This is outrageous.
By all that's Holy, regulate those suckers like a public utility. And before the little, squint-eyed bastard gives me that "go build your own speech", we're waaay past that point. Probably be easier to build your own nuclear power plant.
@jolly said in Steele's Source:
This is outrageous.
Sit down:
Charles Dolan, a longtime Democratic operative and public-relations maven, worked as a senior consultant for the Russian government from 2006 to 2014 and in 2016 had extensive contacts with high-level Russian officials, according to an indictment unsealed Thursday by Special Counsel John Durham. Dolan in 2016 also fed information to Igor Danchenko, a Russian analyst who served as the primary source for Christopher Steele, a former British spy who investigated Donald Trump on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee. During the years he worked for Russia, Dolan was not registered with the Justice Department under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, according to a review of government records.
-
@jolly said in Steele's Source:
This is outrageous.
Sit down:
Charles Dolan, a longtime Democratic operative and public-relations maven, worked as a senior consultant for the Russian government from 2006 to 2014 and in 2016 had extensive contacts with high-level Russian officials, according to an indictment unsealed Thursday by Special Counsel John Durham. Dolan in 2016 also fed information to Igor Danchenko, a Russian analyst who served as the primary source for Christopher Steele, a former British spy who investigated Donald Trump on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee. During the years he worked for Russia, Dolan was not registered with the Justice Department under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, according to a review of government records.
@george-k said in Steele's Source:
@jolly said in Steele's Source:
This is outrageous.
Sit down:
Charles Dolan, a longtime Democratic operative and public-relations maven, worked as a senior consultant for the Russian government from 2006 to 2014 and in 2016 had extensive contacts with high-level Russian officials, according to an indictment unsealed Thursday by Special Counsel John Durham. Dolan in 2016 also fed information to Igor Danchenko, a Russian analyst who served as the primary source for Christopher Steele, a former British spy who investigated Donald Trump on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee. During the years he worked for Russia, Dolan was not registered with the Justice Department under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, according to a review of government records.
Oh, but there's a photo of Trump and Epstein...
-
And here we are, eight hours later.
Remember, Buzzfeed is the outlet that "leaked" the dossier.
-
-
@george-k said in Steele's Source:
LOL:
Link to TweetThis is exactly what liberal democrats do. They "project" their own behavior onto others.
You know... like claiming all over social media to be a "Narcissistic Abuse Survivor" when in fact, they were the "Narcissistic Abuser".
-
@jolly said in Steele's Source:
if you have to tell me up front you are a Mensan, you've told me all I need to know.
Pretty much...
-
@jolly said in Steele's Source:
if you have to tell me up front you are a Mensan, you've told me all I need to know.
Pretty much...
I would have loved to be a fly on the wall when it was announced last Tuesday that a Republican governor, Lt. Governor and Attorney General were elected and 6 democrat House of Delegate members were defeated to switch the Virginia General Assembly from Dem's to Republican control.
I would bet heads exploded.
-
Back to the main gist of the thread...
I would not shed a tear, if somebody told me they found Andrew Weissman slumped over his desk at home, suicide note covered in blood and his Glock on the floor.
The man is the closest thing to Gestapo in Washington.
-
Back to the main gist of the thread...
I would not shed a tear, if somebody told me they found Andrew Weissman slumped over his desk at home, suicide note covered in blood and his Glock on the floor.
The man is the closest thing to Gestapo in Washington.
@jolly said in Steele's Source:
I would not shed a tear, if somebody told me they found Andrew Weissman slumped over his desk at home, suicide note covered in blood and his Glock on the floor.
Hillary has her condolence message ready and waiting.
-
@jolly said in Steele's Source:
I would not shed a tear, if somebody told me they found Andrew Weissman slumped over his desk at home, suicide note covered in blood and his Glock on the floor.
Hillary has her condolence message ready and waiting.
@improviso said in Steele's Source:
@jolly said in Steele's Source:
I would not shed a tear, if somebody told me they found Andrew Weissman slumped over his desk at home, suicide note covered in blood and his Glock on the floor.
Hillary has her condolence message ready and waiting.
On a rolodex...
-
[A] separate lawyer at the firm is currently representing the 2016 “Hillary for America” presidential campaign (the “Clinton Campaign”), as well as multiple former employees of that campaign, in matters before the Special Counsel. As discussed more fully below, the Clinton Campaign financed the opposition research reports, colloquially known as the “Dossier,” that are central to the Indictment against the defendant. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth below, the government respectfully requests that the Court inquire into the potential conflict issues set forth herein.
Thus, the interests of the Clinton Campaign and the defendant could potentially diverge in connection with any plea discussions, pre-trial proceedings, hearings, trial, and sentencing proceedings. Areas of inquiry that may become relevant to defense counsel’s representation of the defendant, and which also may become issues at trial or sentencing, include topics such as (1) the Clinton Campaign’s knowledge or lack of knowledge concerning the veracity of information in the Company Reports sourced by the defendant, (2) the Clinton Campaign’s awareness or lack of awareness of the defendant’s collection methods and sub-sources, (3) meetings or communications between and among the Clinton Campaign, U.S. Investigative Firm-1, and/or U.K. Person-1 regarding or involving the defendant, (4) the defendant’s knowledge or lack of knowledge regarding the Clinton Campaign’s role in and activities surrounding the Company Reports, and (5) the extent to which the Clinton Campaign and/or its representatives directed, solicited, or controlled the defendant’s activities. On each of these issues, the interests of the Clinton Campaign and the defendant might diverge. For example, the Clinton Campaign and the defendant each might have an incentive to shift blame and/or responsibility to the other party for any allegedly false information that was contained within the Company Reports and/or provided to the FBI. Moreover, it is possible that one of these parties might also seek to advance claims that they were harmed or defrauded by the other’s actions, statements, or representations. In addition, in the event that one or more former representatives of the Clinton Campaign (who are represented by defense counsel’s firm) are called to testify at any trial or other court proceeding, the defendant and any such witness would be represented by the same law firm, resulting in a potential conflict. Finally, it is also likely that defense counsel’s firm already has obtained privileged information from the Clinton Campaign regarding matters involving or relating to the defendant, the Company Reports, and the conduct alleged in the Indictment.
IOW, Danchenko is represented by the "Hillary for America" lawyers, and Durham has a problem with that.
Conflict of interest?
Meanwhile, still crickets at buzzfeednews.com.
-
