The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha
-
@taiwan_girl said in The FBI withheld exculpatory evidence - The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
@george-k I agree with what you say. No opinion (at this point) on self defense/murder, etc
My point was that if he were black, I do not believe that he could have walked past the police carrying a gun, with people telling the police he had shot people, and then he just continued on and returned to his hometown.
The police did not stop him, did not detain him, etc.
Just a random perspective.
So what? You believe? I wonder if they would have stopped a unicorn with a gun? Oh, wait..a unicorn can't carry a weapon. That has as much relevance to this situation.
wrote on 10 Nov 2021, 14:47 last edited by@mik said in The FBI withheld exculpatory evidence - The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
@taiwan_girl said in The FBI withheld exculpatory evidence - The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
@george-k I agree with what you say. No opinion (at this point) on self defense/murder, etc
My point was that if he were black, I do not believe that he could have walked past the police carrying a gun, with people telling the police he had shot people, and then he just continued on and returned to his hometown.
The police did not stop him, did not detain him, etc.
Just a random perspective.
So what? You believe? I wonder if they would have stopped a unicorn with a gun? Oh, wait..a unicorn can't carry a weapon. That has as much relevance to this situation.
TG has a theory that black people are treated worse than white people in America.
It’s about time someone spoke up about this.
-
wrote on 10 Nov 2021, 14:49 last edited by
How is this trial still going on? How is this in any way not a total joke at this point?
-
wrote on 10 Nov 2021, 15:08 last edited by
Because of potential riots. Chicago has cancelled police days off this weekend, cops are not happy about it.
-
wrote on 10 Nov 2021, 16:02 last edited by
We need to get this out of our system. We need a just acquittal, and we need some temper tantrum riots that'll set an example that imbecilic outrage is no longer an acceptable reason to destroy city blocks.
-
Because of potential riots. Chicago has cancelled police days off this weekend, cops are not happy about it.
wrote on 10 Nov 2021, 16:11 last edited by@mik said in The FBI withheld exculpatory evidence - The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
Because of potential riots. Chicago has cancelled police days off this weekend, cops are not happy about it.
You mean the department that is understaffed due to their vaccine mandate?
-
wrote on 10 Nov 2021, 17:19 last edited by
-
wrote on 10 Nov 2021, 17:33 last edited by
The judge just ordered the jury out of the room and is ripping the prosecutor a new asshole.
-
The judge just ordered the jury out of the room and is ripping the prosecutor a new asshole.
wrote on 10 Nov 2021, 18:05 last edited by@larry said in The FBI withheld exculpatory evidence - The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
The judge just ordered the jury out of the room and is ripping the prosecutor a new asshole.
This is one pissed-off judge.
-
wrote on 10 Nov 2021, 18:52 last edited by
Why the fuck can't people just be honest and do the right thing? For politics? WTF WTF WTF???
-
wrote on 10 Nov 2021, 19:18 last edited by Horace 11 Oct 2021, 20:12
The prosecutor is playing to leftist pop culture, and probably has political aspirations.
What are the chances that a "diverse" judge, one who wants everybody to know that their perspective is super important and that's what makes them a good judge, would have this same reaction against this flouting of the law by the prosecution?
-
wrote on 10 Nov 2021, 21:43 last edited by
Rittenhouse is being cross-examined at the moment.
I don't know what the rules are in Wisconsin, but I know a bit about Illinois.
In cross-examination, the questioner is not allowed to ask anything that the original questioner touched upon.
For example, under direct examination imagine the following sequence:
Counsel asks witness under direct examination: "Did you see Mr. Jones steal the purse?"
Under cross, the opposing counsel asks: "Mr. Jones also stole an automobile, is that correct?"
Counsel: "Objection, your honor!"
Judge: "Sustained."
-
wrote on 10 Nov 2021, 22:05 last edited by
Thread title changed to continue talk about the trial.
-
wrote on 10 Nov 2021, 22:32 last edited by
It would shock me if he was convicted of anything but the misdemeanor.
-
wrote on 10 Nov 2021, 22:33 last edited by
@jolly said in The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
It would shock me if he was convicted of anything but the misdemeanor.
The DA is making a case that there was no imminent threat to Rittenhouse's life when he fired his rifle.
A lot about "what the hell were you doing there anyway?"
-
@jolly said in The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
It would shock me if he was convicted of anything but the misdemeanor.
The DA is making a case that there was no imminent threat to Rittenhouse's life when he fired his rifle.
A lot about "what the hell were you doing there anyway?"
wrote on 10 Nov 2021, 22:39 last edited by@george-k said in The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
@jolly said in The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
It would shock me if he was convicted of anything but the misdemeanor.
The DA is making a case that there was no imminent threat to Rittenhouse's life when he fired his rifle.
A lot about "what the hell were you doing there anyway?"
The first shooting was the guy that grabbed his rifle, no?
-
@george-k said in The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
@jolly said in The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
It would shock me if he was convicted of anything but the misdemeanor.
The DA is making a case that there was no imminent threat to Rittenhouse's life when he fired his rifle.
A lot about "what the hell were you doing there anyway?"
The first shooting was the guy that grabbed his rifle, no?
wrote on 10 Nov 2021, 22:44 last edited by@lufins-dad said in The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
The first shooting was the guy that grabbed his rifle, no?
I believe so.
But, according to the DA, that was not an imminent threat.
-
@lufins-dad said in The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
The first shooting was the guy that grabbed his rifle, no?
I believe so.
But, according to the DA, that was not an imminent threat.
wrote on 10 Nov 2021, 23:20 last edited by@george-k said in The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
@lufins-dad said in The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
The first shooting was the guy that grabbed his rifle, no?
I believe so.
But, according to the DA, that was not an imminent threat.
It was also the guy that twice threatened to kill him?
-
wrote on 10 Nov 2021, 23:29 last edited by
@lufins-dad said in The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
I called it!
This is why I love this forum. Your comment would get you banned on FB or Twitter.
-
@lufins-dad said in The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
The first shooting was the guy that grabbed his rifle, no?
I believe so.
But, according to the DA, that was not an imminent threat.
wrote on 10 Nov 2021, 23:52 last edited by@george-k said in The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
@lufins-dad said in The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:
The first shooting was the guy that grabbed his rifle, no?
I believe so.
But, according to the DA, that was not an imminent threat.
DA doesn't stand for Dumb Ass, does it?