Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Media liberals used to denounce FBI abuses

Media liberals used to denounce FBI abuses

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
7 Posts 5 Posters 59 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    Loki
    wrote on 17 May 2020, 01:58 last edited by
    #1

    https://nypost.com/2020/05/16/media-liberals-used-to-denounce-fbi-abuses-until-it-went-after-trump/

    NY Post is a conservative rag but if true this could be the article of the decade.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • H Offline
      H Offline
      Horace
      wrote on 17 May 2020, 02:15 last edited by
      #2

      I still don't think anything will rival the white house insider admitting, in the NYT, to being part of a cabal actively subverting the president. And literally every leftist Trump hater I am aware of accepting the situation with barely contained joy. It was a very sad display of low personal integrity, I was very disappointed by a lot of people at that time.

      Education is extremely important.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • J Offline
        J Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on 17 May 2020, 02:25 last edited by
        #3

        Nah. It's well known and nothing will happen.

        Many on the Left have sold their integrity and soul for TDS.

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        1 Reply Last reply
        • R Offline
          R Offline
          Rainman
          wrote on 17 May 2020, 02:36 last edited by
          #4

          OK, I read the article.
          What I got out of it, was the following which I copied and paste here for your perusal:

          "Democrats blamed former FBI Director Jim Comey for losing Hillary Clinton the election in 2016 when he announced days before that agents were newly-surfaced emails — but now hold him up as a paragon of virtue whose."

          Usually, I can fill in the blanks of sloppy news writing. In this case, it's too sloppy. So, if the author or editor is allowed to let something this sloppy get into print, as if they do not care about accuracy at a certain level, then when or where does the truly accurate stuff occur? Or, am I supposed to learn only from those sentences that are wrapped in enough syntax that they make sense, and disregard the rest?

          Funny how slop like this would get a high schooler marked down to maybe a "C." At the New York Post, it seems it's "as long as most paragraphs are somewhere close to being reasonably comprehendible but more importantly, appropriately biased, hey-well that's good enough"

          1 Reply Last reply
          • J Offline
            J Offline
            Jolly
            wrote on 17 May 2020, 12:07 last edited by
            #5

            And here's why nothing will happen:

            https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/jeffrey-lord/2020/05/16/inside-medias-desperate-cover-obamagate

            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

            1 Reply Last reply
            • I Offline
              I Offline
              Improviso
              wrote on 17 May 2020, 13:02 last edited by
              #6

              Maybe they'll change their tune once the indictments start.

              Ever the optimist.

              We have the freedom to choose our actions, but we do not get to choose our consequences.
              Yes, there are two paths you can go by, but in the long run, there's still time to change the road you're on.

              J 1 Reply Last reply 17 May 2020, 13:21
              • I Improviso
                17 May 2020, 13:02

                Maybe they'll change their tune once the indictments start.

                Ever the optimist.

                J Offline
                J Offline
                Jolly
                wrote on 17 May 2020, 13:21 last edited by
                #7

                @Improviso said in Media liberals used to denounce FBI abuses:

                Maybe they'll change their tune once the indictments start.

                Ever the optimist.

                Nah, the lead story will be a Trump tweet. The indictments will be on page 6.

                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                1 Reply Last reply
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes

                2/7

                17 May 2020, 02:15

                topic:navigator.unread, 5

                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                2 out of 7
                • First post
                  2/7
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • Users
                • Groups