A brief history of vaccination mandates....
-
@jolly please exlplain
the FDA approved boosters of for above 65 and 18-64 at high risk, or occupational exposure on Sept 22
on OCT 20, the approval was expanded to include Moderna and J and J.
where exactly was the flip flop?
-
IIRC, the FDA's panel had originally voted for no boosters except for those over 65 or at high risk. That didn't last because of political pressure from the Whitehouse and they rapidly (for the FDA) moved to opening up boosters to most of the population.
I still see no advisements on antibody screening or any pertinent discussion on natural immunity.
At this point, I'd like to see some numbers on mortality and side effects in young children. If the vaccine causes more problems than the disease and natural immunity has any place in our discussion, why are we racing to innoculate children?
-
IIRC, the FDA's panel had originally voted for no boosters except for those over 65 or at high risk. That didn't last because of political pressure from the Whitehouse and they rapidly (for the FDA) moved to opening up boosters to most of the population.
I still see no advisements on antibody screening or any pertinent discussion on natural immunity.
At this point, I'd like to see some numbers on mortality and side effects in young children. If the vaccine causes more problems than the disease and natural immunity has any place in our discussion, why are we racing to innoculate children?
@jolly hey jolly, u have it ass backwards....
the original announcement on august 18th said they would offer to everyone over 18 pending FDA investigation.
"We have developed a plan to begin offering these booster shots this fall subject to FDA conducting an independent evaluation and determination of the safety and effectiveness of a third dose of the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines and CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) issuing booster dose recommendations based on a thorough review of the evidence. We are prepared to offer booster shots for all Americans beginning the week of September 20 and starting 8 months after an individual’s second dose. "
Then on Sept 22 (link https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-authorizes-booster-dose-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-certain-populations ) they actually limited it,as per their board meeting.
thats exactly the opposite of what you suggested. you said the FDA originally voted no boosters except above 65 and the gave into political pressure to open top everyone. what happened is the reverse. The FDA stood up to political pressure and kept it limited.
hey im not making this stuff up, its all out there in the links from the FDA
-
@jolly said in A brief history of vaccination mandates....:
. If the vaccine causes more problems than the disease
Well fortunately that data seems to have proven that already or there never would have been FDA approval. Of course the FDA would not approve a vaccine which causes more harm than good.
Ok you can argue the 4000 kids in the study is not a big enough cohort? Just wait. In a short time there will be hundreds of thousands f kids vaccinated. And then the data will be corroborated
I think here we will start in two weeks jabbing kids. Best things that can happen and best chance to beat this thing down
