Sentencing to follow...
-
Wow, interesting. Have any others?
What happened at the meeting?
Please love yourself.
-
Wow, interesting. Have any others?
What happened at the meeting?
@aqua-letifer said in Sentencing to follow...:
Wow, interesting. Have any others?
What happened at the meeting?
Maybe he can't talk about it...
-
@aqua-letifer said in Sentencing to follow...:
Wow, interesting. Have any others?
What happened at the meeting?
Maybe he can't talk about it...
@jolly said in Sentencing to follow...:
@aqua-letifer said in Sentencing to follow...:
Wow, interesting. Have any others?
What happened at the meeting?
Maybe he can't talk about it...
Yeah because there's no way to circumvent that.
Follow the Silence.
-
Wow, interesting. Have any others?
What happened at the meeting?
@aqua-letifer said in Sentencing to follow...:
Wow, interesting. Have any others?
What happened at the meeting?
Don't really have any other photos. Got there a little late and the outside speechifying had already started. There looked to be about 300 people gathered around a platform and speaker system where a mother was relating the story of a sexual assault that occurred to her daughter 5 years ago in Loudoun Schools and was covered up with the teacher responsible being transferred to another school. Then another parent got up who happened to be a law professor at GMU. He had audited several CRT courses for the university. As a Loudoun County Grand Parent, he had decided to investigate the LCPS SEL coursework. While he wasn't allowed to give the details of the curriculum due to the NDA, he could read parts of actual CRT textbooks that he was reminded of... And he did.
While he was reading, he was interrupted because the public comment part of the meeting had started, and they broadcast it out to us. For those of you unaware, Loudoun County is no longer allowing a live audience in the building during the meetings and speakers have to be brought in, and the their comments are simulcast... So the next 90 minutes were caught on camera by NOVANOW TV. Click on the top video...https://www.novanow.tv/?fbclid=IwAR1NaIFNQTn_vIkw1W3uURGH9N2-lYZ0XIzIN1eqkHBtkiFRuDyU-Xk7Zmg
-
What an absolute shitshow.
-
My TERF friends made FOX!
https://www.foxnews.com/us/parents-speak-out-at-loudoun-county-school-board-meeting
-
@george-k said in Sentencing to follow...:
Let's not talk about the, you know, rapey stuff. Instead, let's talk about the political firestorm.
Because rape reporting dies in darkness.
It wasn’t rape… His skirt got caught on his watch…
-
From the linked article:
But this week, during a juvenile court hearing, a fuller picture of Smith’s daughter’s ordeal emerged. She suffered something atrocious. It had nothing at all to do, however, with trans bathroom policies. Instead, like many women and girls, she was a victim of relationship violence.
Smith’s daughter testified that she’d previously had two consensual sexual encounters with her attacker in the school bathroom. On the day of her assault, they’d agreed to meet up again. “The evidence was that the girl chose that bathroom, but her intent was to talk to him, not to engage in sexual relations,” Biberaj, whose office prosecuted the case, told me. The boy, however, expected sex and refused to accept the girl’s refusal. As the The Washington Post reported, she testified, “He flipped me over. I was on the ground and couldn’t move and he sexually assaulted me.”
The boy was indeed wearing a skirt, but that skirt didn’t authorize him to use the girls’ bathroom. As Amanda Terkel reported in HuffPost, the school district’s trans-inclusive bathroom policies were approved only in August, more than two months after the assault. This was not, said Biberaj, someone “identifying as transgender and going into the girls’ bathroom under the guise of that.”
On Monday, the boy received the juvenile court equivalent of a guilty verdict. The case dealing with the second attack he is accused of will be decided in November.
-
The mother of the teenage boy — both of whom remain unnamed by the media — defended her son, not just from the claims that he identifies as transgender, but also from the rape accusation itself.
"He depicted the rape as an accident, telling his mother he didn't mean to insert himself in her anus and was surprised when it caused her pain," the report said. "'He said he was intending for vaginal and it ended up for 10 seconds as anal,' the mom recalled."
"If I was in a position where I was about to be raped, I would be screaming, kicking, everything," the mother said. "You're 15. You can reasonably defend yourself. You're not just going to sit there and take it. And so, because there wasn't a presence of a fight, he felt it was okay to keep going."
