American Thinker du jour - We's got COVID edition
-
wrote on 9 Sept 2021, 00:47 last edited by
Also, we wanted to live the remainder of our lives not in fear of catching COVID, but with natural immunity to that disease.
The internet has an endless repository of information of which I'll never be able to scratch the surface. I'm sure as shit not going to waste any time listening to some dumbfuck who starts with this.
Yeah yeah I know, I live in fear etc blah blah. I'm afraid of how terribly right this asshole is or whatever the fuck.
-
wrote on 9 Sept 2021, 00:49 last edited by
Tsk, tsk.
A closed mind is a bad thing...
-
wrote on 9 Sept 2021, 00:52 last edited by
@jolly said in American Thinker du jour - We's got COVID edition:
Tsk, tsk.
A closed mind is a bad thing...
I doubt you spend much time looking past the partisan slant to find the truth coming out of NYT, Rolling Stone, Mother Jones or Salon. I doubt that because I never see you cite any of those sources and have heard from you many times that they can't be trusted outright. So what are we even talking about.
-
wrote on 9 Sept 2021, 00:59 last edited by
We're talking about the fact that a rational decision was made to shoot for a superior form of immunity, by not vaccinating, but treating a COVID infection (if ever infected) as early and aggressively as possible. As you read through the essay, they will talk about the screw-ups they made in their strategy.
Perhaps I'm too plebian, but such things do pass for conversation out here beyond the Beltway.
-
@jolly said in American Thinker du jour - We's got COVID edition:
Tsk, tsk.
A closed mind is a bad thing...
I doubt you spend much time looking past the partisan slant to find the truth coming out of NYT, Rolling Stone, Mother Jones or Salon. I doubt that because I never see you cite any of those sources and have heard from you many times that they can't be trusted outright. So what are we even talking about.
wrote on 9 Sept 2021, 01:01 last edited by@aqua-letifer said in American Thinker du jour - We's got COVID edition:
the truth coming out of NYT, Rolling Stone
What?
You actually said that?
C'mon man.
I was going to post more, but I was detained by all the people in front of me protesting the Russia collusion, and those dying on the streets because they couldn't get into ERs because of the ivermectin ignoranti.
-
We're talking about the fact that a rational decision was made to shoot for a superior form of immunity, by not vaccinating, but treating a COVID infection (if ever infected) as early and aggressively as possible. As you read through the essay, they will talk about the screw-ups they made in their strategy.
Perhaps I'm too plebian, but such things do pass for conversation out here beyond the Beltway.
wrote on 9 Sept 2021, 01:04 last edited by@jolly said in American Thinker du jour - We's got COVID edition:
Perhaps I'm too plebian, but such things do pass for conversation out here beyond the Beltway.
- Screw the Beltway. It's Wankertown.
- Fair enough. Natural immunity vs vaccination is a legitimate line of inquiry. But it'd be intellectually dishonest to ignore the fact that this is also the kind of thing that gets passed around by the anti-vaxx crowd to justify their position.
-
@aqua-letifer said in American Thinker du jour - We's got COVID edition:
the truth coming out of NYT, Rolling Stone
What?
You actually said that?
C'mon man.
I was going to post more, but I was detained by all the people in front of me protesting the Russia collusion, and those dying on the streets because they couldn't get into ERs because of the ivermectin ignoranti.
wrote on 9 Sept 2021, 01:08 last edited by Aqua Letifer 9 Sept 2021, 01:09@george-k said in American Thinker du jour - We's got COVID edition:
@aqua-letifer said in American Thinker du jour - We's got COVID edition:
the truth coming out of NYT, Rolling Stone
What?
You actually said that?
C'mon man.
I was going to post more, but I was detained by all the people in front of me protesting the Russia collusion, and those dying on the streets because they couldn't get into ERs because of the ivermectin ignoranti.
Jolly called me out for not giving a Thinker article more consideration, citing closed-mindedness.
I'm claiming that (1) he's at least as dismissive of, say, the NYT, and (2) not absolutely everything published by NYT is a pack of lies. And it's not. They do publish truthful information, all the time.
But because NYT also posts too many whoppers for my liking, I'm dismissive of them, too. I'm not about to force myself to wade through their B.S. just to virtue signal that I'm objective.
Points for "ignoranti," though.