"Mostly Friendly"
-
@george-k said in "Mostly Friendly":
That didn't take long, LOL.
A female CNN reporter uttering the words that they seem friendly???
Where. are all the woke peeps.I have to say are you fucking serious? Her words are utterly bizarre.
@loki said in "Mostly Friendly":
I have to say are you fucking serious? Her words are utterly bizarre.
Yes, serious as a heart attack.
This is a woman who, within 24 hours, decided that it's appropriate to wear a scarf.
It's not like she was in fear because of these "mostly friendly" folks, is it?
This is CNN.
-
Here exact words were bizarre.
CNN reporter on the Taliban takeover in Afghanistan: “They’re just chanting ‘Death to America,’ but they seem friendly at the same time.”
@mik said in "Mostly Friendly":
CNN reporter on the Taliban takeover in Afghanistan: “They’re just chanting ‘Death to America,’ but they seem friendly at the same time.”
Not making any excuses for that chant... but sometimes things get lost in translation a bit. There's a common "rally chant" in India that goes something like this:
<Cause, cause> Zindabad!
<the opposite of the cause> <the opposite of the cause> Murdabad!Zindabad means "long live", and Murdabad means "down with", or literally "death to".
But someone can be more emphasizing the Zindabad part (and be happy), or emphasizing the Murdabad part (and be angry). But the chant typically needs a cause and a foil.
Also - "Death to" doesn't necessarily mean "people should die" in this context. It could mean death to an idea... or down with an idea as well.
Anyways - that's as much rationalizing I can muster in favor of terrorists for one day.
-
@mik said in "Mostly Friendly":
CNN reporter on the Taliban takeover in Afghanistan: “They’re just chanting ‘Death to America,’ but they seem friendly at the same time.”
Not making any excuses for that chant... but sometimes things get lost in translation a bit. There's a common "rally chant" in India that goes something like this:
<Cause, cause> Zindabad!
<the opposite of the cause> <the opposite of the cause> Murdabad!Zindabad means "long live", and Murdabad means "down with", or literally "death to".
But someone can be more emphasizing the Zindabad part (and be happy), or emphasizing the Murdabad part (and be angry). But the chant typically needs a cause and a foil.
Also - "Death to" doesn't necessarily mean "people should die" in this context. It could mean death to an idea... or down with an idea as well.
Anyways - that's as much rationalizing I can muster in favor of terrorists for one day.
@xenon said in "Mostly Friendly":
"Death to" doesn't necessarily mean "people should die" in this context. It could mean death to an idea... or down with an idea as well.
Thanks for the explanation.
Nice to know that "death" doesn't really mean "dying," other than extinction of an idea. That make me feel a lot better.
Anyways - that's as much rationalizing I can muster in favor of terrorists for one day.
LOL.
-
@mik said in "Mostly Friendly":
CNN reporter on the Taliban takeover in Afghanistan: “They’re just chanting ‘Death to America,’ but they seem friendly at the same time.”
Not making any excuses for that chant... but sometimes things get lost in translation a bit. There's a common "rally chant" in India that goes something like this:
<Cause, cause> Zindabad!
<the opposite of the cause> <the opposite of the cause> Murdabad!Zindabad means "long live", and Murdabad means "down with", or literally "death to".
But someone can be more emphasizing the Zindabad part (and be happy), or emphasizing the Murdabad part (and be angry). But the chant typically needs a cause and a foil.
Also - "Death to" doesn't necessarily mean "people should die" in this context. It could mean death to an idea... or down with an idea as well.
Anyways - that's as much rationalizing I can muster in favor of terrorists for one day.
@xenon said in "Mostly Friendly":
@mik said in "Mostly Friendly":
CNN reporter on the Taliban takeover in Afghanistan: “They’re just chanting ‘Death to America,’ but they seem friendly at the same time.”
Not making any excuses for that chant... but sometimes things get lost in translation a bit. There's a common "rally chant" in India that goes something like this:
<Cause, cause> Zindabad!
<the opposite of the cause> <the opposite of the cause> Murdabad!Zindabad means "long live", and Murdabad means "down with", or literally "death to".
But someone can be more emphasizing the Zindabad part (and be happy), or emphasizing the Murdabad part (and be angry). But the chant typically needs a cause and a foil.
Also - "Death to" doesn't necessarily mean "people should die" in this context. It could mean death to an idea... or down with an idea as well.
Anyways - that's as much rationalizing I can muster in favor of terrorists for one day.
Not worried about the terrorists. I was commenting on a female CNN reporter who is saying the Taliban appear friendly in English? Again are you fucking serious that a woman in the US today could get away with that comment on arguably the most brutal regime towards women in existence on the planet.
To further make my point, I suspect she would go nuts on Cuomo for his harassment of women. Compare and contrast Taliban to Cuomo regarding the treatment of women.
-
@xenon said in "Mostly Friendly":
@mik said in "Mostly Friendly":
CNN reporter on the Taliban takeover in Afghanistan: “They’re just chanting ‘Death to America,’ but they seem friendly at the same time.”
Not making any excuses for that chant... but sometimes things get lost in translation a bit. There's a common "rally chant" in India that goes something like this:
<Cause, cause> Zindabad!
<the opposite of the cause> <the opposite of the cause> Murdabad!Zindabad means "long live", and Murdabad means "down with", or literally "death to".
But someone can be more emphasizing the Zindabad part (and be happy), or emphasizing the Murdabad part (and be angry). But the chant typically needs a cause and a foil.
Also - "Death to" doesn't necessarily mean "people should die" in this context. It could mean death to an idea... or down with an idea as well.
Anyways - that's as much rationalizing I can muster in favor of terrorists for one day.
Not worried about the terrorists. I was commenting on a female CNN reporter who is saying the Taliban appear friendly in English? Again are you fucking serious that a woman in the US today could get away with that comment on arguably the most brutal regime towards women in existence on the planet.
To further make my point, I suspect she would go nuts on Cuomo for his harassment of women. Compare and contrast Taliban to Cuomo regarding the treatment of women.
@loki said in "Mostly Friendly":
I suspect she would go nuts on Cuomo for his harassment of women.
On CNN (Chris Cuomo Network)?
Surely you jest.
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
@loki said in "Mostly Friendly":
I suspect she would go nuts on Cuomo for his harassment of women.
On CNN (Chris Cuomo Network)?
Surely you jest.
@george-k said in "Mostly Friendly":
@loki said in "Mostly Friendly":
I suspect she would go nuts on Cuomo for his harassment of women.
On CNN (Chris Cuomo Network)?
Surely you jest.
I know right? But in all fairness I did just. look at her other tweets and she expresses massive concern about treatment of women in Afghanistan… so I didn’t do my homework and I likely would not have commented at all
-
@loki said in "Mostly Friendly":
I suspect she would go nuts on Cuomo for his harassment of women.
On CNN (Chris Cuomo Network)?
Surely you jest.
@george-k said in "Mostly Friendly":
@loki said in "Mostly Friendly":
I suspect she would go nuts on Cuomo for his harassment of women.
On CNN (Chris Cuomo Network)?
Surely you jest.
Chris Cuomo Network would be CCN.
That's two Cs.
CNN has two Ns.
-
@george-k said in "Mostly Friendly":
@loki said in "Mostly Friendly":
I suspect she would go nuts on Cuomo for his harassment of women.
On CNN (Chris Cuomo Network)?
Surely you jest.
Chris Cuomo Network would be CCN.
That's two Cs.
CNN has two Ns.
@aqua-letifer said in "Mostly Friendly":
@george-k said in "Mostly Friendly":
@loki said in "Mostly Friendly":
I suspect she would go nuts on Cuomo for his harassment of women.
On CNN (Chris Cuomo Network)?
Surely you jest.
Chris Cuomo Network would be CCN.
That's two Cs.
CNN has two Ns.
You are correct.
My bad.
I tried (and already had (one cheap) Scotch in me.
I sit corrected.
-
Chris Cuomo Program would be CCP. Coincidence?
Education is extremely important.
-
@horace said in "Mostly Friendly":
Chris Cuomo Program would be CCP. Coincidence?
That's only two. You need 3 Cs. Chris Cuomo Communist Program.
-
-
@aqua-letifer said in "Mostly Friendly":
@george-k said in "Mostly Friendly":
Does "Cuomo News Network" work?
This is CNN.
Yea, now it has two N-Words…
