Senator Scott asks CEOs what their objections to the Georgia law are
-
-
https://www.newsweek.com/georgias-new-voting-law-racist-opinion-1581772
https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/26/politics/georgia-voting-law-black-voters/index.html
Note also that Sen. Scott (or his office) is the one who posted that video on his YouTube channel and turned off comments. It stands to reason to suspect they he posts only parts of the video that show him in the best light. It looks like there is silence because ... well, who knows what he cut out from the video before posting it on YouTube? Turning off comment also prevented any rebuttal right under the video. At best, you can only treat that video as a form of campaign advertising.
-
https://www.newsweek.com/georgias-new-voting-law-racist-opinion-1581772
https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/26/politics/georgia-voting-law-black-voters/index.html
Note also that Sen. Scott (or his office) is the one who posted that video on his YouTube channel and turned off comments. It stands to reason to suspect they he posts only parts of the video that show him in the best light. It looks like there is silence because ... well, who knows what he cut out from the video before posting it on YouTube? Turning off comment also prevented any rebuttal right under the video. At best, you can only treat that video as a form of campaign advertising.
@axtremus said in Senator Scott asks CEOs what their objections to the Georgia law are:
https://www.newsweek.com/georgias-new-voting-law-racist-opinion-1581772
https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/26/politics/georgia-voting-law-black-voters/index.html
Note also that Sen. Scott (or his office) is the one who posted that video on his YouTube channel and turned off comments. It stands to reason to suspect they he posts only parts of the video that show him in the best light. It looks like there is silence because ... well, who knows what he cut out from the video before posting it on YouTube? Turning off comment also prevented any rebuttal right under the video. At best, you can only treat that video as a form of campaign advertising.
-
Yes, they remove the Secretary of State as the chief of elections. It’s SUPPOSED TO BE A LEGISLATIVE RESPONSIBILITY, not an Executive.
-
Yes, they can now remove an Election Official... IF THEY BREAK ELECTION LAW 3 TIMES IN 2 ELECTIONS!!! WTF?! Why aren’t they fired and going to jail and why the hell are Democrats so upset over this? This is freaking ridiculous...
The rest of their assertions are just as bad.
-
