Another Voter Fraud Case - with evidence and confession
-
https://abcnews.go.com/US/man-arrested-wifes-murder-now-accused-voting-trump/story?id=77692708
A Colorado man who was arrested for alleging murdering his wife also sent in a ballot in his wife’s name — well after the wife has been reported as a missing person. County worker reported the fraud to the authorities after receiving a ballot that came from a missing person.
County sheriff already seized the ballot and the envelop as evidence. The accused’s has also confessed to the FBI:
During an interview with FBI agents in April, Barry Morphew allegedly confessed to submitting his wife's ballot, according to the affidavit.
"Just because I wanted Trump to win," he allegedly said, per a transcript of the conversation included in the affidavit. "I just thought, give him another vote."
He used his missing wife’s name to send in another vote for Trump.
-
@loki said in Another Voter Fraud Case - with evidence and confession:
Why didn’t you quote the part where he said she was going to vote for Trump?
That part is hearsay.
Why is that part important? Are you trying to argue that if you know that a person was going to vote a certain way before he is dead or missing, then it would be OK for you to vote that way in that person’s name after that person is dead or has gone missing?
-
@loki said in Another Voter Fraud Case - with evidence and confession:
Why didn’t you quote the part where he said she was going to vote for Trump?
That part is hearsay.
Why is that part important? Are you trying to argue that if you know that a person was going to vote a certain way before he is dead or missing, then it would be OK for you to vote that way in that person’s name after that person is dead or has gone missing?
@axtremus said in Another Voter Fraud Case - with evidence and confession:
@loki said in Another Voter Fraud Case - with evidence and confession:
Why didn’t you quote the part where he said she was going to vote for Trump?
That part is hearsay.
Why is that part important? Are you trying to argue that if you know that a person was going to vote a certain way before he is dead or missing, then it would be OK for you to vote that way in that person’s name after that person is dead or has gone missing?
You put out an article about voter fraud. It was worthy on its merits. Then you quote a part about picking up an extra Trump vote as if that was the story but left out the part in the piece where it said she was a Trump voter to begin with. That’s why I pointed it out.
