Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Social Security Growth

Social Security Growth

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
17 Posts 8 Posters 121 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    George - No doubt they’d get better returns my fear is the government would use what would become very large positions in major corporations as additional leverage over them to implement their social and economic policies. What’s worse is the leverage would be administrative in nature so not subject to legislative veto points.

    This happens today with state pension funds but the scale of influence would be altogether different.

    Norway, Saudi Arabia and a number of gulf states have sovereign wealth funds but they don’t really have the influence in US markets of the kind I fear.

    Only non-witches get due process.

    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

      Careful what you wish for. Do you really want the SSA to own trillions of dollars of stocks?

      How might Senator Warren make use of that?

      AxtremusA Away
      AxtremusA Away
      Axtremus
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      @jon-nyc said in Social Security Growth:

      How might Senator Warren AOC make use of that?

      There, that will scare @George-K off the idea.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

        I still support the Bush era idea that a portion could be put into a fund of your preference.

        X Offline
        X Offline
        xenon
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        @lufins-dad It's just the administration of it that becomes complex. Which is probably a lot more solvable these days with software systems.

        I'd think the vast majority of those actively plan for retirement would want this.

        It does create a new vector of inequality - because people who aren't educated on these things will miss out on gains. But them be the breaks.

        LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
        • X xenon

          @lufins-dad It's just the administration of it that becomes complex. Which is probably a lot more solvable these days with software systems.

          I'd think the vast majority of those actively plan for retirement would want this.

          It does create a new vector of inequality - because people who aren't educated on these things will miss out on gains. But them be the breaks.

          LuFins DadL Offline
          LuFins DadL Offline
          LuFins Dad
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          @xenon said in Social Security Growth:

          @lufins-dad It's just the administration of it that becomes complex. Which is probably a lot more solvable these days with software systems.

          I'd think the vast majority of those actively plan for retirement would want this.

          It does create a new vector of inequality - because people who aren't educated on these things will miss out on gains. But them be the breaks.

          I would keep the options very limited. An extremely stable fund, a moderate risk fund, and a moderately high risk fund. The fund managers would be an outside firm, contracts running every 24 month with renewal awards based on past success and costs...

          The Brad

          1 Reply Last reply
          • KincaidK Offline
            KincaidK Offline
            Kincaid
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            I have long thought it was a shame that Social Security didn't morph into something closer to a 401k mutual fund back when Eisenhower was the president.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • JollyJ Offline
              JollyJ Offline
              Jolly
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              Much of the problem is that...

              1. Social Security should never be paid to an illegal alien.
              2. SSI rules and compliance should be tightened.
              3. People should be educated at an early age, that Social Security us not, and was never ment to be, a person's entire retirement. It is meant to be a supplement.

              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

              jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
              • JollyJ Jolly

                Much of the problem is that...

                1. Social Security should never be paid to an illegal alien.
                2. SSI rules and compliance should be tightened.
                3. People should be educated at an early age, that Social Security us not, and was never ment to be, a person's entire retirement. It is meant to be a supplement.
                jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                @jolly 1. isn't a problem. you don't get SS without an SSN and you don't get an SSN as an illegal alien.

                Only non-witches get due process.

                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                  @jolly 1. isn't a problem. you don't get SS without an SSN and you don't get an SSN as an illegal alien.

                  JollyJ Offline
                  JollyJ Offline
                  Jolly
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  @jon-nyc said in Social Security Growth:

                  @jolly 1. isn't a problem. you don't get SS without an SSN and you don't get an SSN as an illegal alien.

                  I'll be the first to admit things change, but in the past it took just a few hours to get a Social Security card in some places down on the border. For one price, you could get a bogus card with a real number you could not collect on. For a higher price, you could get a card that you could collect on.

                  The procedure for a good number was to use the number of a deceased person who had never collected benefits and who had died.

                  I don't know if this tactic still works, but it used to...

                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                  X 1 Reply Last reply
                  • JollyJ Jolly

                    @jon-nyc said in Social Security Growth:

                    @jolly 1. isn't a problem. you don't get SS without an SSN and you don't get an SSN as an illegal alien.

                    I'll be the first to admit things change, but in the past it took just a few hours to get a Social Security card in some places down on the border. For one price, you could get a bogus card with a real number you could not collect on. For a higher price, you could get a card that you could collect on.

                    The procedure for a good number was to use the number of a deceased person who had never collected benefits and who had died.

                    I don't know if this tactic still works, but it used to...

                    X Offline
                    X Offline
                    xenon
                    wrote on last edited by xenon
                    #15

                    @jolly said in Social Security Growth:

                    The procedure for a good number was to use the number of a deceased person who had never collected benefits and who had died.

                    Very interesting. Do these people somehow have to not be reported as dead?

                    I'm guess social security has some sort of pretty defined mechanism to know when to stop paying payments to someone.

                    If there is a loophole (unreported dead people) - seems like there's some sort of criminal intermediary that makes a market for these.

                    Do you necessarily have to be an illegal alien to buy on that market?

                    Not asking you questions directly, Jolly. Just an interesting situation.

                    JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                    • LuFins DadL Offline
                      LuFins DadL Offline
                      LuFins Dad
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      @xenon said in Social Security Growth:

                      @jolly said in Social Security Growth:

                      The procedure for a good number was to use the number of a deceased person who had never collected benefits and who had died.

                      Very interesting. Do these people somehow have to not be reported as dead?

                      I'm guess social security has some sort of pretty defined mechanism to know when to stop paying payments to someone.

                      If there is a loophole (unreported dead people) - seems like there's some sort of criminal intermediary that makes a market for these.

                      Do you necessarily have to be an illegal alien to buy on that market?

                      Not asking you questions directly, Jolly. Just an interesting situation.

                      After the last year, you still have hope of basic competency in the Federal Bureaucracy?

                      The Brad

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • X xenon

                        @jolly said in Social Security Growth:

                        The procedure for a good number was to use the number of a deceased person who had never collected benefits and who had died.

                        Very interesting. Do these people somehow have to not be reported as dead?

                        I'm guess social security has some sort of pretty defined mechanism to know when to stop paying payments to someone.

                        If there is a loophole (unreported dead people) - seems like there's some sort of criminal intermediary that makes a market for these.

                        Do you necessarily have to be an illegal alien to buy on that market?

                        Not asking you questions directly, Jolly. Just an interesting situation.

                        JollyJ Offline
                        JollyJ Offline
                        Jolly
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        @xenon said in Social Security Growth:

                        @jolly said in Social Security Growth:

                        The procedure for a good number was to use the number of a deceased person who had never collected benefits and who had died.

                        Very interesting. Do these people somehow have to not be reported as dead?

                        I'm guess social security has some sort of pretty defined mechanism to know when to stop paying payments to someone.

                        If there is a loophole (unreported dead people) - seems like there's some sort of criminal intermediary that makes a market for these.

                        Do you necessarily have to be an illegal alien to buy on that market?

                        Not asking you questions directly, Jolly. Just an interesting situation.

                        Criminal?

                        Nah. The cartels would never do anything criminal...

                        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups