Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Who killed Ashli Babbitt?

Who killed Ashli Babbitt?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
102 Posts 13 Posters 1.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

    @renauda said in Who killed Ashli Babbitt?:

    @lufins-dad said in Who killed Ashli Babbitt?:

    Miriam Carey

    Case in point and that happened in 2013.

    And that was with potential lawsuits and ALOT of media attention.

    No, I don’t have a problem with the identity being kept quiet. I just wish that the same standard be applied towards police at the local level until the cases are fully investigated. How many officers have had their lives ruined because of the quick judgement of the mob that almost always winds up being based on incorrect facts.

    Doctor PhibesD Offline
    Doctor PhibesD Offline
    Doctor Phibes
    wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
    #29

    @lufins-dad said in Who killed Ashli Babbitt?:

    @renauda said in Who killed Ashli Babbitt?:

    @lufins-dad said in Who killed Ashli Babbitt?:

    Miriam Carey

    Case in point and that happened in 2013.

    And that was with potential lawsuits and ALOT of media attention.

    No, I don’t have a problem with the identity being kept quiet. I just wish that the same standard be applied towards police at the local level until the cases are fully investigated. How many officers have had their lives ruined because of the quick judgement of the mob that almost always winds up being based on incorrect facts.

    I don't have a problem with keeping them anonymous, as long as the investigation is genuine, and there are safeguards against a whitewash (no pun intended)

    I was only joking

    1 Reply Last reply
    • L Offline
      L Offline
      Loki
      wrote on last edited by
      #30

      Too bad the media and social media don’t feel the way people do here. Plastered all over the news is the right to know which law enforcement officer murdered the victim yet in this case crickets.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • L Loki

        @jon-nyc said in Who killed Ashli Babbitt?:

        Honestly when a large mob overwhelms the force protecting a branch of government a hail of indiscriminate gunfire is probably indicated.

        Would anybody expect otherwise had it been the White House?

        Security was abhorrent. The Mayor begged for no national guard presence. Capitol police was biased based on prior events of this nature. Right wing unrest was building for decades.

        The 250+ arrested were 2/3 over 34, only 13% members of right wing groups, 40% were biz owners and or white collar, and only 9% unemployed. I can only imagine the other thousands were probably even more of that nature. Not your typical riot crowd if you were evaluating your invaders in real time.

        ? Offline
        ? Offline
        A Former User
        wrote on last edited by
        #31

        @loki said in Who killed Ashli Babbitt?:

        @jon-nyc said in Who killed Ashli Babbitt?:

        Honestly when a large mob overwhelms the force protecting a branch of government a hail of indiscriminate gunfire is probably indicated.

        Would anybody expect otherwise had it been the White House?

        Security was abhorrent. The Mayor begged for no national guard presence. Capitol police was biased based on prior events of this nature. Right wing unrest was building for decades.

        The 250+ arrested were 2/3 over 34, only 13% members of right wing groups, 40% were biz owners and or white collar, and only 9% unemployed. I can only imagine the other thousands were probably even more of that nature. Not your typical riot crowd if you were evaluating your invaders in real time.

        The one thing they all had in common though was they all drank the orange koolaid. I hear it's powerful stuff.

        JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
        • RenaudaR Renauda

          @jon-nyc said in Who killed Ashli Babbitt?:

          Less than a year ago the Secret Service shot a man outside the white house complex that they deemed a threat.

          They didn't release the shooter's name.

          That could be an inconvenient fact for some who feel they have a need to know about the Babbitt shooting.

          I am certain that an internal investigation has already taken place and the officer involved has been accordingly cleared of any wrong doing. I realise there are people who feel and insist they have a need to know about this, but at the end of the day they do not have any need, let alone any right to know about a lot of internal police and security matters.

          JollyJ Offline
          JollyJ Offline
          Jolly
          wrote on last edited by
          #32

          @renauda said in Who killed Ashli Babbitt?:

          @jon-nyc said in Who killed Ashli Babbitt?:

          Less than a year ago the Secret Service shot a man outside the white house complex that they deemed a threat.

          They didn't release the shooter's name.

          That could be an inconvenient fact for some who feel they have a need to know about the Babbitt shooting.

          I am certain that an internal investigation has already taken place and the officer involved has been accordingly cleared of any wrong doing. I realise there are people who feel and insist they have a need to know about this, but at the end of the day they do not have any need, let alone any right to know about a lot of internal police and security matters.

          You argue in the face of the fact we know the name of the officer in any public police shooting (within U.S., U.S. citizen).

          So, why not in this case?

          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

          jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
          • JollyJ Jolly

            @renauda said in Who killed Ashli Babbitt?:

            @jon-nyc said in Who killed Ashli Babbitt?:

            Less than a year ago the Secret Service shot a man outside the white house complex that they deemed a threat.

            They didn't release the shooter's name.

            That could be an inconvenient fact for some who feel they have a need to know about the Babbitt shooting.

            I am certain that an internal investigation has already taken place and the officer involved has been accordingly cleared of any wrong doing. I realise there are people who feel and insist they have a need to know about this, but at the end of the day they do not have any need, let alone any right to know about a lot of internal police and security matters.

            You argue in the face of the fact we know the name of the officer in any public police shooting (within U.S., U.S. citizen).

            So, why not in this case?

            jon-nycJ Online
            jon-nycJ Online
            jon-nyc
            wrote on last edited by
            #33

            @jolly Did you read the thread? This doesn’t seem to be unusual in the case of Secret Service or Capitol police.

            Only non-witches get due process.

            • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
            JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
            • ? A Former User

              @loki said in Who killed Ashli Babbitt?:

              @jon-nyc said in Who killed Ashli Babbitt?:

              Honestly when a large mob overwhelms the force protecting a branch of government a hail of indiscriminate gunfire is probably indicated.

              Would anybody expect otherwise had it been the White House?

              Security was abhorrent. The Mayor begged for no national guard presence. Capitol police was biased based on prior events of this nature. Right wing unrest was building for decades.

              The 250+ arrested were 2/3 over 34, only 13% members of right wing groups, 40% were biz owners and or white collar, and only 9% unemployed. I can only imagine the other thousands were probably even more of that nature. Not your typical riot crowd if you were evaluating your invaders in real time.

              The one thing they all had in common though was they all drank the orange koolaid. I hear it's powerful stuff.

              JollyJ Offline
              JollyJ Offline
              Jolly
              wrote on last edited by
              #34

              @nobodyssock said in Who killed Ashli Babbitt?:

              @loki said in Who killed Ashli Babbitt?:

              @jon-nyc said in Who killed Ashli Babbitt?:

              Honestly when a large mob overwhelms the force protecting a branch of government a hail of indiscriminate gunfire is probably indicated.

              Would anybody expect otherwise had it been the White House?

              Security was abhorrent. The Mayor begged for no national guard presence. Capitol police was biased based on prior events of this nature. Right wing unrest was building for decades.

              The 250+ arrested were 2/3 over 34, only 13% members of right wing groups, 40% were biz owners and or white collar, and only 9% unemployed. I can only imagine the other thousands were probably even more of that nature. Not your typical riot crowd if you were evaluating your invaders in real time.

              The one thing they all had in common though was they all drank the orange koolaid. I hear it's powerful stuff.

              Tell ya what...Scenario...Any city within America...

              BLM riot. Protester breaks into a public building, be it courthouse, be it police station, whatever. An officer of the court fires on an unarmed BLM protester and kills them.

              I'd like to hear your argument about why the matter would not be made public.

              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                @jolly Did you read the thread? This doesn’t seem to be unusual in the case of Secret Service or Capitol police.

                JollyJ Offline
                JollyJ Offline
                Jolly
                wrote on last edited by Jolly
                #35

                @jon-nyc said in Who killed Ashli Babbitt?:

                @jolly Did you read the thread? This doesn’t seem to be unusual in the case of Secret Service or Capitol police.

                I don't believe in different standards for officers of the court, when the shooting occurs on American territory against an American citizen.

                Period.

                To do otherwise, is madness. Ruby Ridge Redux.

                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ Online
                  jon-nycJ Online
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #36

                  Ok, but I think it’s definitively not true that it’s being withheld just in this case only.

                  Only non-witches get due process.

                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                    Doctor PhibesD Offline
                    Doctor Phibes
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #37

                    Does America normally name it's secret service agents?

                    I was only joking

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #38

                      No. Nor capitol police.

                      Only non-witches get due process.

                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                        Doctor PhibesD Offline
                        Doctor Phibes
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #39

                        Glad to here it. There's not much chance of being a tip-top Secret Agent if your name appears in the papers.

                        I was only joking

                        JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                        • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                          Glad to here it. There's not much chance of being a tip-top Secret Agent if your name appears in the papers.

                          JollyJ Offline
                          JollyJ Offline
                          Jolly
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #40

                          @doctor-phibes said in Who killed Ashli Babbitt?:

                          Glad to here it. There's not much chance of being a tip-top Secret Agent if your name appears in the papers.

                          They're not secret agents. The Secret Service works for Homeland Security.

                          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                          Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                          • JollyJ Jolly

                            @doctor-phibes said in Who killed Ashli Babbitt?:

                            Glad to here it. There's not much chance of being a tip-top Secret Agent if your name appears in the papers.

                            They're not secret agents. The Secret Service works for Homeland Security.

                            Doctor PhibesD Offline
                            Doctor PhibesD Offline
                            Doctor Phibes
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #41

                            Well, they shouldn't call themselves the Secret Service then. You certainly wouldn't catch James Bond messing about with this hoi polloi rabble.

                            I was only joking

                            ? 1 Reply Last reply
                            • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                              Well, they shouldn't call themselves the Secret Service then. You certainly wouldn't catch James Bond messing about with this hoi polloi rabble.

                              ? Offline
                              ? Offline
                              A Former User
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #42

                              I don’t know what the standard procedure is for these kinds of officers. But, in this singular case, as someone else mentioned earlier, this man would have millions of nutters out to get him if his name became public, regardless of whether he was justified in the shooting or not. For this man and his families own safety, it is only common sense not to release his name to the public.

                              JollyJ CopperC 2 Replies Last reply
                              • ? A Former User

                                I don’t know what the standard procedure is for these kinds of officers. But, in this singular case, as someone else mentioned earlier, this man would have millions of nutters out to get him if his name became public, regardless of whether he was justified in the shooting or not. For this man and his families own safety, it is only common sense not to release his name to the public.

                                JollyJ Offline
                                JollyJ Offline
                                Jolly
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #43

                                @nobodyssock said in Who killed Ashli Babbitt?:

                                I don’t know what the standard procedure is for these kinds of officers. But, in this singular case, as someone else mentioned earlier, this man would have millions of nutters out to get him if his name became public, regardless of whether he was justified in the shooting or not. For this man and his families own safety, it is only common sense not to release his name to the public.

                                Millions?

                                Idiot.

                                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                ? 1 Reply Last reply
                                • ? A Former User

                                  I don’t know what the standard procedure is for these kinds of officers. But, in this singular case, as someone else mentioned earlier, this man would have millions of nutters out to get him if his name became public, regardless of whether he was justified in the shooting or not. For this man and his families own safety, it is only common sense not to release his name to the public.

                                  CopperC Online
                                  CopperC Online
                                  Copper
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #44

                                  @nobodyssock said in Who killed Ashli Babbitt?:

                                  I don’t know what the standard procedure is for these kinds of officers. But, in this singular case, as someone else mentioned earlier, this man would have millions of nutters out to get him if his name became public, regardless of whether he was justified in the shooting or not. For this man and his families own safety, it is only common sense not to release his name to the public.

                                  That depends somewhat on who you kill, or who you are accused of killing.

                                  Some police get their own wiki

                                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derek_Chauvin

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • RenaudaR Offline
                                    RenaudaR Offline
                                    Renauda
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #45

                                    Squirrel!

                                    Elbows up!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • JollyJ Jolly

                                      @nobodyssock said in Who killed Ashli Babbitt?:

                                      I don’t know what the standard procedure is for these kinds of officers. But, in this singular case, as someone else mentioned earlier, this man would have millions of nutters out to get him if his name became public, regardless of whether he was justified in the shooting or not. For this man and his families own safety, it is only common sense not to release his name to the public.

                                      Millions?

                                      Idiot.

                                      ? Offline
                                      ? Offline
                                      A Former User
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #46

                                      @jolly said in Who killed Ashli Babbitt?:

                                      @nobodyssock said in Who killed Ashli Babbitt?:

                                      I don’t know what the standard procedure is for these kinds of officers. But, in this singular case, as someone else mentioned earlier, this man would have millions of nutters out to get him if his name became public, regardless of whether he was justified in the shooting or not. For this man and his families own safety, it is only common sense not to release his name to the public.

                                      Millions?

                                      Idiot.

                                      Billions even! That's how many Trump think voted for him.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • AxtremusA Offline
                                        AxtremusA Offline
                                        Axtremus
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #47

                                        It seems the public will soon know the answer to the question originally posed by this thread: “Who lilled Ashli Babbitt”

                                        https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/25/ashli-babbitt-shooter-to-reveal-identity-to-nbc-news-lester-holt.html

                                        The officer who fired the shot will review his/her identity at an interview to be aired on Thursday, 2021 August 26.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • HoraceH Online
                                          HoraceH Online
                                          Horace
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #48

                                          Glad they found a way to monetize this. I hear the shooter’s contract includes bonus clauses for tears and other obvious signs of emotional stress, especially during descriptions of PTSD symptoms.

                                          Education is extremely important.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups