Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?
-
Sorry ( a stereotypical Canadianism) Horace, but with all due respect, I simply can't resist a little history lesson for you and maybe a few others on this topic:
https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2019/02/20/695941323/when-nazis-took-manhattan
@renauda said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
Sorry ( a stereotypical Canadianism) Horace, but with all due respect, I simply can't resist a little history lesson for you and maybe a few others on this topic:
https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2019/02/20/695941323/when-nazis-took-manhattan
I was raised in America, Renauda. You read about it.
Their vision for America was a cocktail of white supremacy, fascist ideology and American patriotism.
It's such bullshit. Attributing such hatred to us. I don't appreciate it.
Education is extremely important.
-
We do control the world. That’s why it’s so fucked up.
-
@renauda said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
Sorry ( a stereotypical Canadianism) Horace, but with all due respect, I simply can't resist a little history lesson for you and maybe a few others on this topic:
https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2019/02/20/695941323/when-nazis-took-manhattan
I was raised in America, Renauda. You read about it.
Their vision for America was a cocktail of white supremacy, fascist ideology and American patriotism.
It's such bullshit. Attributing such hatred to us. I don't appreciate it.
@horace said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
It's such bullshit. Attributing such hatred to us. I don't appreciate it.
Really? On the other hand the US also produced John Reed and Max Eastman. Look them up, John Reed in particular - Wiki's your friend.
But if it's any consolation things here were not much better as far as right wing nutters and anti-Semites:
-
@horace said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
It's such bullshit. Attributing such hatred to us. I don't appreciate it.
Really? On the other hand the US also produced John Reed and Max Eastman. Look them up, John Reed in particular - Wiki's your friend.
But if it's any consolation things here were not much better as far as right wing nutters and anti-Semites:
@renauda said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
@horace said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
It's such bullshit. Attributing such hatred to us. I don't appreciate it.
Really? On the other hand the US also produced John Reed and Max Eastman. Look them up, John Reed in particular - Wiki's your friend.
But if it's any consolation things here were not much better as far as right wing nutters and anti-Semites:
I probably don't agree with whatever ideas are being said by whatever people you are quoting. Get specific or get lost, or, better yet, get better friends.
-
@jon-nyc said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
“Since elected” seems like a bit of special pleading, doesn’t it?
No, it isnt.
I want you to consider some of the things said or done by Omar, AOC, Sheila Jackson Lee, Bang -a-Wang and others, who have not had any committee assignments taken away.
Greene has not done anything since she has been sworn in, that should generate the media attention or the rise of Cancel Culture in the House. It's unfair and quite simply, un-American.
@jolly said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
@jon-nyc said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
“Since elected” seems like a bit of special pleading, doesn’t it?
No, it isnt.
I want you to consider some of the things said or done by Omar, AOC, Sheila Jackson Lee, Bang -a-Wang and others, who have not had any committee assignments taken away.
Greene has not done anything since she has been sworn in, that should generate the media attention or the rise of Cancel Culture in the House. It's unfair and quite simply, un-American.
Sure she has. She has publicly sworn allegiance to all that isTrump. She believes every word out of his mouth. She is not the standard republican congress critter who is simply afraid of Trump and the votes he would lose if he ever spoke against him. She is a true koolaid drinking nut job that shouldn’t be allowed any job higher than taking your order at McDonald’s.
-
@jolly said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
@jon-nyc said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
“Since elected” seems like a bit of special pleading, doesn’t it?
No, it isnt.
I want you to consider some of the things said or done by Omar, AOC, Sheila Jackson Lee, Bang -a-Wang and others, who have not had any committee assignments taken away.
Greene has not done anything since she has been sworn in, that should generate the media attention or the rise of Cancel Culture in the House. It's unfair and quite simply, un-American.
Sure she has. She has publicly sworn allegiance to all that isTrump. She believes every word out of his mouth. She is not the standard republican congress critter who is simply afraid of Trump and the votes he would lose if he ever spoke against him. She is a true koolaid drinking nut job that shouldn’t be allowed any job higher than taking your order at McDonald’s.
@nobodyssock said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
@jolly said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
@jon-nyc said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
“Since elected” seems like a bit of special pleading, doesn’t it?
No, it isnt.
I want you to consider some of the things said or done by Omar, AOC, Sheila Jackson Lee, Bang -a-Wang and others, who have not had any committee assignments taken away.
Greene has not done anything since she has been sworn in, that should generate the media attention or the rise of Cancel Culture in the House. It's unfair and quite simply, un-American.
Sure she has. She has publicly sworn allegiance to all that isTrump. She believes every word out of his mouth. She is not the standard republican congress critter who is simply afraid of Trump and the votes he would lose if he ever spoke against him. She is a true koolaid drinking nut job that shouldn’t be allowed any job higher than taking your order at McDonald’s.
The best part of you ran down your mama's leg, didn't it?
-
-
If she believes what she's said, she's a complete fucking nutjob.
If she doesn't, she's arguably even worse.
-
@nobodyssock said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
@jolly said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
@jon-nyc said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
“Since elected” seems like a bit of special pleading, doesn’t it?
No, it isnt.
I want you to consider some of the things said or done by Omar, AOC, Sheila Jackson Lee, Bang -a-Wang and others, who have not had any committee assignments taken away.
Greene has not done anything since she has been sworn in, that should generate the media attention or the rise of Cancel Culture in the House. It's unfair and quite simply, un-American.
Sure she has. She has publicly sworn allegiance to all that isTrump. She believes every word out of his mouth. She is not the standard republican congress critter who is simply afraid of Trump and the votes he would lose if he ever spoke against him. She is a true koolaid drinking nut job that shouldn’t be allowed any job higher than taking your order at McDonald’s.
The best part of you ran down your mama's leg, didn't it?
@jolly said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
@nobodyssock said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
@jolly said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
@jon-nyc said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
“Since elected” seems like a bit of special pleading, doesn’t it?
No, it isnt.
I want you to consider some of the things said or done by Omar, AOC, Sheila Jackson Lee, Bang -a-Wang and others, who have not had any committee assignments taken away.
Greene has not done anything since she has been sworn in, that should generate the media attention or the rise of Cancel Culture in the House. It's unfair and quite simply, un-American.
Sure she has. She has publicly sworn allegiance to all that isTrump. She believes every word out of his mouth. She is not the standard republican congress critter who is simply afraid of Trump and the votes he would lose if he ever spoke against him. She is a true koolaid drinking nut job that shouldn’t be allowed any job higher than taking your order at McDonald’s.
The best part of you ran down your mama's leg, didn't it?
Come on Jolly, you already used that one on me. Let's try to get a little more creative ok?
-
Serious question for the conservative side here:
What advantage is there for having President Trump lead the Republic Party going forward?
What disadvantage is there?
Which one is higher?
-
Serious question for the conservative side here:
What advantage is there for having President Trump lead the Republic Party going forward?
What disadvantage is there?
Which one is higher?
@taiwan_girl said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
Serious question for the conservative side here:
What advantage is there for having President Trump lead the Republic Party going forward?
His magnetic personality, and legendary attention to detail.
I was only joking
-
@taiwan_girl said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
Serious question for the conservative side here:
What advantage is there for having President Trump lead the Republic Party going forward?
His magnetic personality, and legendary attention to detail.
@doctor-phibes I agree that he does have a magnetic personality. But I think the areas where he is most popular will vote Republic no matter what, whether he is the leader of teh party of not.
In the areas where it can go to either party, I think he can be a hurt in those elections. In 2020 elections, those areas had a big change in voting from Republic --> Democrat.
-
Serious question for the conservative side here:
What advantage is there for having President Trump lead the Republic Party going forward?
What disadvantage is there?
Which one is higher?
@taiwan_girl said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
Serious question for the conservative side here:
What advantage is there for having President Trump lead the Republic Party going forward?
What disadvantage is there?
Which one is higher?
The new voters. Either the GOP cuts into the black and latino voters or it is doomed to minority status.
-
@taiwan_girl said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
Serious question for the conservative side here:
What advantage is there for having President Trump lead the Republic Party going forward?
His magnetic personality, and legendary attention to detail.
@doctor-phibes said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
@taiwan_girl said in Who’s more representative of the future of the GOP?:
Serious question for the conservative side here:
What advantage is there for having President Trump lead the Republic Party going forward?
His magnetic personality, and legendary attention to detail.
You missed his occasional and extremely contrived, descent into politeness and civility.
