John Nash’s graduate school recommendation letter
-
wrote on 25 Apr 2020, 11:14 last edited by
-
wrote on 25 Apr 2020, 13:17 last edited by
Never seen this before. All letters of recommendation should be this clear and concise.
-
wrote on 25 Apr 2020, 13:19 last edited by
If you can honestly use the word genius in relation to the candidate, what else is needed?
-
wrote on 25 Apr 2020, 13:24 last edited by Klaus
Yeah, I've seen that recommendation letter a couple of times. But I think it is an awful letter.
That letter may work somewhat if the letter writer is one of the most recognized figures in the field. But if I or any other run-of-the-mill prof would write a letter like that, it would instantly kill an application, or at least not help.
All this letter does is saying "This guy doesn't need a recommendation letter".
-
wrote on 25 Apr 2020, 13:26 last edited by
Elitist.
-
wrote on 25 Apr 2020, 13:30 last edited by
"Genius" probably works better than "Klaus is better at mathematics than he is at the piano".
-
wrote on 25 Apr 2020, 17:13 last edited by
They didn't have text editors.
That was typed on a typewriter.
-
wrote on 25 Apr 2020, 20:37 last edited by
Unrelated to this thread between introverts, a typed letter used to mean that you did not really know or care about a person. A real letter of introduction or recommendation was always handwritten. Maybe that’s not so well known.
-
Unrelated to this thread between introverts, a typed letter used to mean that you did not really know or care about a person. A real letter of introduction or recommendation was always handwritten. Maybe that’s not so well known.
wrote on 25 Apr 2020, 20:40 last edited by@Loki said in John Nash’s graduate school recommendation letter:
Unrelated to this thread between introverts, a typed letter used to mean that you did not really know or care about a person. A real letter of introduction or recommendation was always handwritten. Maybe that’s not so well known.
Still true today. It's about the level of effort.