Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. 54% of asymptomatic Diamond Princess patients had ground glass abnormalities on CT

54% of asymptomatic Diamond Princess patients had ground glass abnormalities on CT

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
19 Posts 8 Posters 187 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
    #9

    My concern is whether there are any long term effects of this. Right now the feeling is there are at least as many “asymptomatic” people as symptomatic, and that other than a temporary contagion threat they’re fine. What if that isn’t true?

    Only non-witches get due process.

    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
    L 1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

      My concern is whether there are any long term effects of this. Right now the feeling is there are at least as many “asymptomatic” people as symptomatic, and that other than a temporary contagion threat they’re fine. What if that isn’t true?

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Loki
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      @jon-nyc said in 54% of asymptomatic Diamond Princess patients had ground glass abnormalities on CT:

      My concern is whether there are any long term effects of this. Right now the feeling is there are at least as many “asymptomatic” people as symptomatic, and that other than a temporary contagion threat they’re fine. What if that isn’t true?

      It’s not even discussed in the piece. If 100% of mildly symptomatic have “ground glass” your concern would be for anyone who had come into contact with CV. Eventually that will be almost the entire planet.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nyc
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        That latter will only be true if our leaders really fuck up.

        Only non-witches get due process.

        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
        1 Reply Last reply
        • George KG George K

          @Jolly said in 54% of asymptomatic Diamond Princess patients had ground glass abnormalities on CT:

          No.

          But I'm no doc...

          What Jolly said. Very unusual to see this.

          However, an x-ray (and that's really what a CT scan is) is a picture, not a diagnosis. "Ground glass" is a sign of COVID-19, as well as ARDS and other pulmonary pathologies. Without knowing how symptomatic these people are, or without following them for a long time, it's impossible to make any kind of judgment. Also, it's not uncommon for X-Ray to lag behind symptoms for several days.

          JollyJ Offline
          JollyJ Offline
          Jolly
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          @George-K said in 54% of asymptomatic Diamond Princess patients had ground glass abnormalities on CT:

          @Jolly said in 54% of asymptomatic Diamond Princess patients had ground glass abnormalities on CT:

          No.

          But I'm no doc...

          What Jolly said. Very unusual to see this.

          However, an x-ray (and that's really what a CT scan is) is a picture, not a diagnosis. "Ground glass" is a sign of COVID-19, as well as ARDS and other pulmonary pathologies. Without knowing how symptomatic these people are, or without following them for a long time, it's impossible to make any kind of judgment. Also, it's not uncommon for X-Ray to lag behind symptoms for several days.

          I've heard some docs say they trust their ears as much as the xray in some early pneumonia cases.

          How effective is a stethoscope on lung sounds?

          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

          George KG 1 Reply Last reply
          • JollyJ Jolly

            @George-K said in 54% of asymptomatic Diamond Princess patients had ground glass abnormalities on CT:

            @Jolly said in 54% of asymptomatic Diamond Princess patients had ground glass abnormalities on CT:

            No.

            But I'm no doc...

            What Jolly said. Very unusual to see this.

            However, an x-ray (and that's really what a CT scan is) is a picture, not a diagnosis. "Ground glass" is a sign of COVID-19, as well as ARDS and other pulmonary pathologies. Without knowing how symptomatic these people are, or without following them for a long time, it's impossible to make any kind of judgment. Also, it's not uncommon for X-Ray to lag behind symptoms for several days.

            I've heard some docs say they trust their ears as much as the xray in some early pneumonia cases.

            How effective is a stethoscope on lung sounds?

            George KG Offline
            George KG Offline
            George K
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            @Jolly said in 54% of asymptomatic Diamond Princess patients had ground glass abnormalities on CT:

            I've heard some docs say they trust their ears as much as the xray in some early pneumonia cases.

            How effective is a stethoscope on lung sounds?

            Depends on the user. However, it's a lot easier to hear stuff in the lungs with a stethoscope than in the heart, which tends to be more subtle in the "less severe" conditions. At least, that was the case for me. There are all kinds of different sounds that may represent different things: rales, rhochi, wheezes, crackles.

            That said, if you want to listen to lungs, you have to listen to lungs. That means a lot more than putting a stethoscope on someones back and listening through his shirt in four spots. Listen, for several breaths to each lobe in the back. Then do it all again from the front.

            Basically, you have to pay attention, and take your time.

            "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

            The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

            brendaB 1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nyc
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              When my lungs were at their worst, I remember several times when some GP would listen to them for a long time. There was no diagnosis to be preformed, I was on a transplant list. They just had never, or rarely, heard such damaged lungs and were satisfying their curiosity. It didn't really bother me.

              Only non-witches get due process.

              • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
              1 Reply Last reply
              • George KG George K

                @Jolly said in 54% of asymptomatic Diamond Princess patients had ground glass abnormalities on CT:

                I've heard some docs say they trust their ears as much as the xray in some early pneumonia cases.

                How effective is a stethoscope on lung sounds?

                Depends on the user. However, it's a lot easier to hear stuff in the lungs with a stethoscope than in the heart, which tends to be more subtle in the "less severe" conditions. At least, that was the case for me. There are all kinds of different sounds that may represent different things: rales, rhochi, wheezes, crackles.

                That said, if you want to listen to lungs, you have to listen to lungs. That means a lot more than putting a stethoscope on someones back and listening through his shirt in four spots. Listen, for several breaths to each lobe in the back. Then do it all again from the front.

                Basically, you have to pay attention, and take your time.

                brendaB Offline
                brendaB Offline
                brenda
                wrote on last edited by brenda
                #15

                @George-K

                What do different sounds in the lungs tend to mean? For instance, the crackling sound, what does that often indicate?

                1 Reply Last reply
                • L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Loki
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  Radiologist friend who read article said trouble is these findings are non specific and can be seen with any viral pneumonia and even non infectious conditions...been seeing ground GGO in asymptotic patients who had scans for other reasons long before this outbreak.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    Over 50%? Of patients reporting no respiratory symptoms?

                    That would surprise me.

                    Only non-witches get due process.

                    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    • MikM Offline
                      MikM Offline
                      Mik
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      Nasty virus, this thing. Still want to throw things wide open?

                      “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                        Over 50%? Of patients reporting no respiratory symptoms?

                        That would surprise me.

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Loki
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #19

                        A google search found this.

                        https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25082478

                        Most common cause of GGO is pulmonary edema aka fluid in the lungs. Often CHF.

                        Now if you had the breakout of the crew that had GGO you might be on to something more significant.

                        I have no idea if GGO goes away naturally. I guess someone can google that.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups