The Media Fellating Thread
-
@Larry said in The Media Fellating Thread:
, changed the north Korean problem for the better,
Just curious, I follow DPRK pretty closely.
In your opinion, What has changed for the better?
I guess a better question would be - what has changed?
To me, things are pretty much the same. DPRK is still continuing with its nuclear program, etc
(BTW, even saying the above, I agreed with President Trump and his attempts to try and engage Premier Kim)
wrote on 30 Nov 2020, 20:11 last edited by@taiwan_girl said in The Media Fellating Thread:
@Larry said in The Media Fellating Thread:
, changed the north Korean problem for the better,
Just curious, I follow DPRK pretty closely.
In your opinion, What has changed for the better?
I guess a better question would be - what has changed?
To me, things are pretty much the same. DPRK is still continuing with its nuclear program, etc
(BTW, even saying the above, I agreed with President Trump and his attempts to try and engage Premier Kim)
Maybe you do, but I've seen how you follow most everything else, so its no surprise to me that you had to ask a question with so obvious an answer. I also realize that accepting and understanding the answer requires you to give Trump credit for something positive, and you just aren't capable of doing that. You also try to make everything the same, nothing changes, nothing anyone does moves the needle on anything, yada yada.
But I'll answer your question anyway, although I already know you will disagree and tell me why you are more informed than me, come up with reasons why nothing really changed, and then polish the padlock on the door to your mind.
When Trump took office, the Obama administration had made a huge mess all over the place. ISIS had come into existence as a direct result of the Obama administration's ineptitude. The ridiculous Iran deal was done, and billions of dollars was hauled over on planes by the pallet load, basicallyhelping Iran fund terrorism around the world. It was so bad, so stupid, that either Obama was the most inept fool to ever occupy the presidency, or he was intentionally helping our enemies. Or both.
Regardless of which it was, Kim saw everyone else getting away with everything, sized Obama up as a feckless idiot who didn't have the guts or the ability to do anything about it, and took advantage of obama's incompetence to escalate. He began testing rockets, spending more on nuclear weapons, and was openly threatening to strike the US once he had a missile that would reach us.
Then Trump took over. He canceled the deal with Iraq,, put sanctions on them that hurt them enough that they couldn't afford to fund terrorists as much as before, and smacked Iran every time they tried to be a problem. He killed some of Iran's top people. He destroyed ISIS. And he publicly told "little rocket man" that he had a bigger nuclear button, and if Kim didn't stop threatening to strike the US he would, in so many words, blast North Korea into a glassy hole. Kim saw he was up against a real leader who wasn't afraid of him, and he stopped threatening to attack the US. He hasn't threatened to attack us since.
That's what changed.
Now - if Biden becomes president, he's already announced his plans to go right back to the exact same inept policies as before. So once Kim sees the US has another inept fool in the White House, Kim will take advantage of it again.
But I guess for some, at least no one is hurting their widdle feewings.
-
wrote on 30 Nov 2020, 20:13 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in The Media Fellating Thread:
Did it ever come out what was behind Trump's unexplained visit to Walter Reed a year ago?
Im sure if it had been important, Dr. O'Conner would have kicked his TDS into gear and made sure everyone knew what it was.
-
President-elect Joe Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris on Sunday announced an all-female White House senior communications team, including former Obama White House communications director Jen Psaki as press secretary.
"I am proud to announce today the first senior White House communications team comprised entirely of women. These qualified, experienced communicators bring diverse perspectives to their work and a shared commitment to building this country back better," Biden said in a statement.
And even better, "women of color!"
These seven women, several of whom are women of color, will occupy some of the most visible roles in the administration.
Plenty of hair to sniff! Well done, Joe!
wrote on 1 Dec 2020, 15:19 last edited by -
-
wrote on 1 Dec 2020, 23:09 last edited by
Biden introduces members of his economic team:
https://www.wtva.com/content/news/573250411.html
He responds to one, one, question:
-
wrote on 1 Dec 2020, 23:33 last edited by
Why didn't he tweet that this is the best economic team ever?
What's wrong?
-
wrote on 5 Dec 2020, 19:43 last edited by
-
wrote on 5 Dec 2020, 20:01 last edited by
If fox isn't hiring, what's the option?
-
wrote on 28 Dec 2020, 14:27 last edited by
Oh, and for some perspective....
-
wrote on 28 Dec 2020, 14:59 last edited by
Weren't we taking about shamelessness the other day?
-
wrote on 28 Dec 2020, 23:02 last edited by
The Compost is hiring around 150 people in a horrible newspaper economy.
-
wrote on 11 Jan 2021, 16:43 last edited by
-
wrote on 11 Jan 2021, 17:15 last edited by Catseye3 1 Nov 2021, 17:16
In a fit of lysdexia (t/h Renauda) I misredd a key word in this headline: "Kamala Harris' marriage inspires so many of us still searching for our Dougs"
I was like, all right, but I'm not sure Kamala's dong search is any of my business . . .
-
wrote on 11 Jan 2021, 17:32 last edited by
@klaus said in The Media Fellating Thread:
You have chosen the thread title wisely, Mr. @George-K .
Winner!
-
wrote on 15 Jan 2021, 22:32 last edited by
How wonderful!
-
wrote on 15 Jan 2021, 23:13 last edited by
-
wrote on 15 Jan 2021, 23:14 last edited by Doctor Phibes
Sorry, that's not fellating. That was the other end of the alimentary canal.
-
wrote on 15 Jan 2021, 23:18 last edited by
