Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Nah, we'll rely on the backup.

Nah, we'll rely on the backup.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
3 Posts 2 Posters 40 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    George K
    wrote on 20 Dec 2020, 13:25 last edited by
    #1

    https://spacenews.com/nasa-to-skip-repair-of-orion-electronics-unit/

    NASA will not repair a faulty electronics unit on the Orion spacecraft recently completed for the Artemis 1 mission after concluding there was sufficient redundancy in the overall system.

    In a Dec. 17 statement, NASA said it had decided to “use as is” one of eight power and data units (PDU) on the Orion spacecraft, which provide communications between the spacecraft’s computers and other components. One of two redundant channels in one of two communications cards in that PDU is not working.

    NASA announced the problem with the PDU Nov. 30, saying only that it was “troubleshooting the issue.” The problem was first reported by The Verge, which said that presentations by prime contractor Lockheed Martin warned it could take up to a year to replace the PDU because it is located in an adapter between the crew module and service module that is inaccessible now that the two modules are mated to each other.

    That time estimate assumed that the crew module would be demated from the service module, the PDU repaired, and the two modules combined again and tested. An alternative option could complete repairs in just four months, but would require removing panels of the adapter to reach the PDU, something the hardware was not designed for.

    NASA, in its statement about deciding not to replace the PDU, did not go into details about the repair options, but said that the risks of damaging the spacecraft during the PDU repair outweighed any loss of data should the unit completely malfunction.

    If it's just data loss that's at risk, I understand the decision.

    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

    C 1 Reply Last reply 20 Dec 2020, 13:51
    • G George K
      20 Dec 2020, 13:25

      https://spacenews.com/nasa-to-skip-repair-of-orion-electronics-unit/

      NASA will not repair a faulty electronics unit on the Orion spacecraft recently completed for the Artemis 1 mission after concluding there was sufficient redundancy in the overall system.

      In a Dec. 17 statement, NASA said it had decided to “use as is” one of eight power and data units (PDU) on the Orion spacecraft, which provide communications between the spacecraft’s computers and other components. One of two redundant channels in one of two communications cards in that PDU is not working.

      NASA announced the problem with the PDU Nov. 30, saying only that it was “troubleshooting the issue.” The problem was first reported by The Verge, which said that presentations by prime contractor Lockheed Martin warned it could take up to a year to replace the PDU because it is located in an adapter between the crew module and service module that is inaccessible now that the two modules are mated to each other.

      That time estimate assumed that the crew module would be demated from the service module, the PDU repaired, and the two modules combined again and tested. An alternative option could complete repairs in just four months, but would require removing panels of the adapter to reach the PDU, something the hardware was not designed for.

      NASA, in its statement about deciding not to replace the PDU, did not go into details about the repair options, but said that the risks of damaging the spacecraft during the PDU repair outweighed any loss of data should the unit completely malfunction.

      If it's just data loss that's at risk, I understand the decision.

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Copper
      wrote on 20 Dec 2020, 13:51 last edited by
      #2

      @george-k said in Nah, we'll rely on the backup.:

      NASA, in its statement about deciding not to replace the PDU, did not go into details about the repair options, but said that the risks of damaging the spacecraft during the PDU repair outweighed any loss of data should the unit completely malfunction.

      It sounds like a good decision, but that is surprising that the design has such an expensive maintenance option.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • C Offline
        C Offline
        Copper
        wrote on 22 Dec 2020, 23:37 last edited by
        #3

        NASA production values getting better

        Link to video

        1 Reply Last reply
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes

        2/3

        20 Dec 2020, 13:51


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        2 out of 3
        • First post
          2/3
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • Users
        • Groups