Cuomo: "Battle Skepticism"
-
@jon-nyc said in Cuomo: "Battle Skepticism":
No, that's the Washington Examiner being deceptive, avoiding the relevant context. It was two months ago.
Okay that is really fair.
That said Coumo did say that he was going to hold back on vaccine distribution in NY until Biden’s team could figure it out. Really revealing comment.
-
Pre-election:
"Governor Andrew Cuomo is threatening to withhold a COVID-19 vaccine from New York until his team of doctors deem it safe because he doesn't trust the FDA or CDC, raising serious questions about how and when it will eventually become available and who will be the arbiter of it."
Thirty days later:
"This is the weapon that is going to win the war," Cuomo said, holding a vile up for reporters. "And that is the light at the end of the tunnel, right?"
Same FDA. Same CDC. Therefore, what changed?
I'll give y'all three guesses and the first two don't count.
-
It's not rocket science and I already mentioned it above. THat's when Trump was threatening to overrule the FDA'S guidelines on EUA approval to further his own electoral interest.
In the event, the NY board "approved" it the day before the FDA issued the EUA.
-
@jon-nyc said in Cuomo: "Battle Skepticism":
No he didn’t. That’s your clear mischaraterization of what he said.
Actually you’ve been playing a solo game of telephone with that one. Each time you bring it up it gets further and further from what he said.
So just how far off was my interpretation from November 9 after Pfizer’s huge game changing announcement?