The Hate
-
-
@nobodyssock said in The Hate:
@nobodyssock said in The Hate:
thats not the subject of this thread Dr. Whatabout
No, it's not.
But it's relevant to your comment about mingling with the hoi-palloi.
Your comment about President Trump raised a question about his interaction with "ordinary people."
I simply asked if you can apply the same standard to Obama. Or, for that matter, Bush II, Clinton, Bush I.
If you can't your insult is, well, facile and ignorant. For the moment, I'll ignore your name-calling.
Wasnt meant as an insult. Just stating a fact here. You average 3 to 4 whataboutism posts per day.
Sock, before you get too comfortable with your asshole attitude, let's look back over your history to check your batting average. According to you, Trump was going to be convicted and thrown in prison 3 years ago. According to you, Trump was guilty of colluding with Russia, it was a proven fact, and on and on. You've been so utterly wrong on every single thing you believe for so long and so consistently that if you say something is true it's 109% certain to be a lie.
In short Sock, you couldn't find your own ass with a road map to it. So fuck you.
Talking of hate Larry, how are your insane thoughts to prosecute and execute two-thirds of the Democrat party for treason coming along
-
Link to video
Trump used the wrong word. But two facts remain:
- Trump never said for people to go inject themselves with bleach.
- Biden knew that and lied through his teeth to make political points. Points which a willing media had continually lied about.
Do you enjoy being manipulated?
Always remember, Operation Valkyrie was an act of sedition.
Warning: I post things that interest me. Read and comment at your own discretion. -
@nobodyssock said in The Hate:
@nobodyssock said in The Hate:
thats not the subject of this thread Dr. Whatabout
No, it's not.
But it's relevant to your comment about mingling with the hoi-palloi.
Your comment about President Trump raised a question about his interaction with "ordinary people."
I simply asked if you can apply the same standard to Obama. Or, for that matter, Bush II, Clinton, Bush I.
If you can't your insult is, well, facile and ignorant. For the moment, I'll ignore your name-calling.
Wasnt meant as an insult. Just stating a fact here. You average 3 to 4 whataboutism posts per day.
Sock, before you get too comfortable with your asshole attitude, let's look back over your history to check your batting average. According to you, Trump was going to be convicted and thrown in prison 3 years ago. According to you, Trump was guilty of colluding with Russia, it was a proven fact, and on and on. You've been so utterly wrong on every single thing you believe for so long and so consistently that if you say something is true it's 109% certain to be a lie.
In short Sock, you couldn't find your own ass with a road map to it. So fuck you.
Talking of hate Larry, how are your insane thoughts to prosecute and execute two-thirds of the Democrat party for treason coming along
And what do you add to the conversation? I notice that you never show up and haven't hardly been around here for years and now we're on some crusade about Larry, rarely posting about anything except to attack him.
Are you changing your screen name to Bored in Blighty?
Always remember, Operation Valkyrie was an act of sedition.
Warning: I post things that interest me. Read and comment at your own discretion. -
@nobodyssock said in The Hate:
@nobodyssock said in The Hate:
thats not the subject of this thread Dr. Whatabout
No, it's not.
But it's relevant to your comment about mingling with the hoi-palloi.
Your comment about President Trump raised a question about his interaction with "ordinary people."
I simply asked if you can apply the same standard to Obama. Or, for that matter, Bush II, Clinton, Bush I.
If you can't your insult is, well, facile and ignorant. For the moment, I'll ignore your name-calling.
Wasnt meant as an insult. Just stating a fact here. You average 3 to 4 whataboutism posts per day.
Sock, before you get too comfortable with your asshole attitude, let's look back over your history to check your batting average. According to you, Trump was going to be convicted and thrown in prison 3 years ago. According to you, Trump was guilty of colluding with Russia, it was a proven fact, and on and on. You've been so utterly wrong on every single thing you believe for so long and so consistently that if you say something is true it's 109% certain to be a lie.
In short Sock, you couldn't find your own ass with a road map to it. So fuck you.
Talking of hate Larry, how are your insane thoughts to prosecute and execute two-thirds of the Democrat party for treason coming along
I keep forgetting when I say things that some people here aren't intelligent enough to understand what I say. You see, I never said that, but youre too stupid to understand what in did say.
-
@nobodyssock said in The Hate:
@nobodyssock said in The Hate:
thats not the subject of this thread Dr. Whatabout
No, it's not.
But it's relevant to your comment about mingling with the hoi-palloi.
Your comment about President Trump raised a question about his interaction with "ordinary people."
I simply asked if you can apply the same standard to Obama. Or, for that matter, Bush II, Clinton, Bush I.
If you can't your insult is, well, facile and ignorant. For the moment, I'll ignore your name-calling.
Wasnt meant as an insult. Just stating a fact here. You average 3 to 4 whataboutism posts per day.
Sock, before you get too comfortable with your asshole attitude, let's look back over your history to check your batting average. According to you, Trump was going to be convicted and thrown in prison 3 years ago. According to you, Trump was guilty of colluding with Russia, it was a proven fact, and on and on. You've been so utterly wrong on every single thing you believe for so long and so consistently that if you say something is true it's 109% certain to be a lie.
In short Sock, you couldn't find your own ass with a road map to it. So fuck you.
Talking of hate Larry, how are your insane thoughts to prosecute and execute two-thirds of the Democrat party for treason coming along
And what do you add to the conversation? I notice that you never show up and haven't hardly been around here for years and now we're on some crusade about Larry, rarely posting about anything except to attack him.
Are you changing your screen name to Bored in Blighty?
Andy is the typical little effeminate male, scared he might be a homosexual, jealous of real men, so he bites at their ankles from behind his computer screen in an effort to feel "manly" so he doesn't have to deal with the fact that he's a little pussy man.
-
@nobodyssock said in The Hate:
Ok, well my 17 year old dog died Wednesday. Had to finally put him down as he wasn't eating or walking anymore. It was a hard day. I was lucky to find a vet who makes house calls though, and she was awesome. Me and the pups gathered around DJ in my backyard in the sun and it went very peacefully.
Hugs to you.
-
@nobodyssock said in The Hate:
@nobodyssock said in The Hate:
thats not the subject of this thread Dr. Whatabout
No, it's not.
But it's relevant to your comment about mingling with the hoi-palloi.
Your comment about President Trump raised a question about his interaction with "ordinary people."
I simply asked if you can apply the same standard to Obama. Or, for that matter, Bush II, Clinton, Bush I.
If you can't your insult is, well, facile and ignorant. For the moment, I'll ignore your name-calling.
Wasnt meant as an insult. Just stating a fact here. You average 3 to 4 whataboutism posts per day.
Somehow some smart people convinced the mediocre minds that whataboutisms are categorically wrong to employ in rhetorical debate. While in reality, they are the most meaningful rhetorical points one can make. I've attempted to explain this here before, but there are powerful minds here continuing to manipulate the mediocre among you of the categorical weakness of the argumentation mode.
-
Why They Hate Trump
Simply put, they hate Trump because he represents ordinary Americans — those who are not part of the political and corporate elite, who lack the advantages and connections of the Deep State, who are not media, academics, or celebs. President Trump puts ordinary Americans first, and it drives the elite nuts.That alone is a great introduction to How to build an Authoritarian State and Cult of Personality.
Donald Trump; the Juan Peron of the 21st century.
“Little by little I am learning the art of being quite content by doing very little slowly” ~ Lionel Hardcastle
-
@taiwan_girl said in The Hate:
k, well my 17 year old dog died Wednesday. Had to finally put him down as he wasn't eating or walking anymore. It was a hard day.
I just now caught up with this, NS. My heart to yours. I have been where you are, and it's agonizing.
-
Why They Hate Trump
Simply put, they hate Trump because he represents ordinary Americans — those who are not part of the political and corporate elite, who lack the advantages and connections of the Deep State, who are not media, academics, or celebs. President Trump puts ordinary Americans first, and it drives the elite nuts.That alone is a great introduction to How to build an Authoritarian State and Cult of Personality.
Donald Trump; the Juan Peron of the 21st century.
Historical precedence says more about the person drawing the inference and what they believe as an individual than it does about what will actually happen. I have not been more dissapointed with any set of ideas more than I've been disappointed by vague historical references, citing some name or date like you're some kind of genius findind an exact analogue in history. Which obviously you didn't, and couldn't. I will never forget Timothy Snyder's faceplant upon the Trump election in 2016, wherein he used all of his power as perhaps the world's leading historian. His predictions were garbage, and he was proven to be a histrionic prancing princess.
-
I am sorry to hear that my posts disappoint. I actually thought the comparison to Juan Peron was at least partially justified. After all, Peron was not quite the ogre apparent leftists such as myself use in the same sentence as Trump. I could have just as easily invoked Charles DeGaulle (although he actually did serve in uniform with some distinction) or perhaps, closer to home and more accurately, Huey Long or maybe even George Wallace.
As for the 19 Brumaire reference, US institutions continue to be robust as the events of the past month demonstrate. That's a good thing and as I have stated I hope my prediction of an American Caesar is unfounded. Still, the continuing divisiveness of American society will come at a price and that price will be those very institutions that have held strong the past four tumultuous years.
let me know if you would prefer that I post links to dubious editorials and conspiracy theory websites and videos as the reactionaries do here. Not sure that I will oblige.
In the meantime, take care.
-
@nobodyssock said in The Hate:
@Doctor-Phibes said in The Hate:
NS, I was really sorry to hear about your dog. I wanted to say something on FB, but I can never find the words. He clearly meant the world to you.
Thanks man. I know the feeling. And he did. Appreciate it.
17 years! That’s a long companion relationship. I found getting a puppy is the best therapy.
-
You are not the only person I associate with a guy who establishes intelligence with historical references. It's a pattern. One I noticed decades ago. I'm sure a lot of smart people know a lot about history, and are fascinated by history. I think they sometimes tend to over extrapolate, because historical references sound smart, and they like sounding smart.
-
You are not the only person I associate with a guy who establishes intelligence with historical references. It's a pattern. One I noticed decades ago. I'm sure a lot of smart people know a lot about history, and are fascinated by history. I think they sometimes tend to over extrapolate, because historical references sound smart, and they like sounding smart.
Funny thing about history is that it changes with the times. People and events become more or less important and interpretations change wildly. As presentism is so wildly in vogue these days, many events and people are now selectively canceled so I don’t think we can study many things in history these days.
Also as a fun ironic note, the guy who wrote that “those that don’t know history are doomed to repeat it” was a eugenist. Can you get rid of the person and not the idea?
-
You are not the only person I associate with a guy who establishes intelligence with historical references. It's a pattern. One I noticed decades ago. I'm sure a lot of smart people know a lot about history, and are fascinated by history. I think they sometimes tend to over extrapolate, because historical references sound smart, and they like sounding smart.
I believe that point was originally made by Aristotle.
