A republic, if you can keep it.
-
At about the 1:10 minute mark, he says “many Democrat will cheat because they think the world will end if President Trump is reelected”
Change that around, and it sounds like what many people here have been saying if President Elect Biden was elected - “the world is ending. End of the US”
So, it seems like both sides will cheat to get their person elected. Each cancel each other out.
-
At about the 1:10 minute mark, he says “many Democrat will cheat because they think the world will end if President Trump is reelected”
Change that around, and it sounds like what many people here have been saying if President Elect Biden was elected - “the world is ending. End of the US”
So, it seems like both sides will cheat to get their person elected. Each cancel each other out.
@taiwan_girl said in A republic, if you can keep it.:
At about the 1:10 minute mark, he says “many Democrat will cheat because they think the world will end if President Trump is reelected”
Change that around, and it sounds like what many people here have been saying if President Elect Biden was elected - “the world is ending. End of the US”
So, it seems like both sides will cheat to get their person elected. Each cancel each other out.
Again, equivalence flying in the face of evidence. Not saying Republicans won't cheat, but Dems have a long and rich history of doing so.
-
@taiwan_girl said in A republic, if you can keep it.:
At about the 1:10 minute mark, he says “many Democrat will cheat because they think the world will end if President Trump is reelected”
Change that around, and it sounds like what many people here have been saying if President Elect Biden was elected - “the world is ending. End of the US”
So, it seems like both sides will cheat to get their person elected. Each cancel each other out.
Again, equivalence flying in the face of evidence. Not saying Republicans won't cheat, but Dems have a long and rich history of doing so.
@Jolly what evidence has been given in this election that either side cheated?
Evidence that a court has agreed with.
Even the Republics lawyers have said in their court filings that they are NOT saying fraud has occurred.
Me saying it does not make it true. You saying it does not make it true.
People who are saying fraud DID NOT occur on this election
Republic lawyers and investigators
US court system (state and federal level)
State election officials (both Republic and Democrat)People who are saying fraud DID occur
Random internet people
-
@Jolly what evidence has been given in this election that either side cheated?
Evidence that a court has agreed with.
Even the Republics lawyers have said in their court filings that they are NOT saying fraud has occurred.
Me saying it does not make it true. You saying it does not make it true.
People who are saying fraud DID NOT occur on this election
Republic lawyers and investigators
US court system (state and federal level)
State election officials (both Republic and Democrat)People who are saying fraud DID occur
Random internet people
@taiwan_girl said in A republic, if you can keep it.:
@Jolly what evidence has been given in this election that either side cheated?
Evidence that a court has agreed with.
Even the Republics lawyers have said in their court filings that they are NOT saying fraud has occurred.
Me saying it does not make it true. You saying it does not make it true.
People who are saying fraud DID NOT occur on this election
Republic lawyers and investigators
US court system (state and federal level)
State election officials (both Republic and Democrat)People who are saying fraud DID occur
Random internet people
You need to stop repeating out of date propaganda you got from the news media. You also need to quit stopping at the point you hear something you want to hear. For instance, your claim that Republican lawyers have said in court filings that "they are not saying fraud has occurred". That is false. They were talking about one very small specific group of ballots, not the entirety of the matter. Not even the media reports of that case reaches the conclusion you're jumping to. You have simply picked out the words you like and ignored everything else and created an entirely false claim that no one has made but you.
-
At about the 1:10 minute mark, he says “many Democrat will cheat because they think the world will end if President Trump is reelected”
Change that around, and it sounds like what many people here have been saying if President Elect Biden was elected - “the world is ending. End of the US”
So, it seems like both sides will cheat to get their person elected. Each cancel each other out.
@taiwan_girl said in A republic, if you can keep it.:
At about the 1:10 minute mark, he says “many Democrat will cheat because they think the world will end if President Trump is reelected”
Change that around, and it sounds like what many people here have been saying if President Elect Biden was elected - “the world is ending. End of the US”
So, it seems like both sides will cheat to get their person elected. Each cancel each other out.
"Many" people have been saying that if Biden is elected the US would end? Name two.
-
@taiwan_girl said in A republic, if you can keep it.:
At about the 1:10 minute mark, he says “many Democrat will cheat because they think the world will end if President Trump is reelected”
Change that around, and it sounds like what many people here have been saying if President Elect Biden was elected - “the world is ending. End of the US”
So, it seems like both sides will cheat to get their person elected. Each cancel each other out.
"Many" people have been saying that if Biden is elected the US would end? Name two.
-
@taiwan_girl said in A republic, if you can keep it.:
@Horace maybe end of the world is too strong but I believe (and happy to be prove wrong) that @Jolly and @Larry have said that the end of the US we know it will come if the Democrat is elected.
I said our nation as we know it will end. And it will. But that's not saying it will end period, it will go on at least for a while as a totalitarian hell hole until it ends up another Venezuela. You can go ahead and thank the democrat party for that.
Ah, you say that's silly.... tell that to the democrat "leaders" who have been saying that's exactly where they'll take us.
-
@Horace said in A republic, if you can keep it.:
Don't think Jolly said that.
I don't think Jolly did, either...
-
@Horace said in A republic, if you can keep it.:
Don't think Jolly said that.
I don't think Jolly did, either...
@Jolly I apologize.
-
It’s been interesting watching them lower the bar to the point where they no longer even claim to have an view based on evidence. They now pretend to derive it from first principles.
Soon they’ll completely shift the burden of proof, and demand to be convinced that the election wasn’t stolen.
Only non-witches get due process.
- Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
-
https://greenwald.substack.com/p/biden-appointee-neera-tanden-spread
The announcement that Joe Biden intends to nominate Neera Tanden as his Director of the Office of Management and Budget — a critical position overseeing U.S. economic and regulatory policy — triggered a wide range of mockery, indignation and disgust from both the left and the right. That should not be surprising: though a thoroughly mediocre and ordinary D.C. swamp creature from the perspective of both ideology and competence, Tanden’s uniquely unhinged, venomous, corrupt and pathologically dishonest conduct as a Clinton Family and DNC apparatchik and President of the corporatist-and-despot-funded Center for American Progress (CAP) has earned her a list of enemies far longer and more impressive than her accomplishments.
Four days after the 2016 election, Tanden began strongly implying, if not outright stating, that Russian hackers changed the vote totals, and that this is why “Trump was as surprised as everyone else” by his victory. When I highlighted her conspiratorial claims, she did not deny their obvious meaning, but rationalized them by insisting that her conspiracies were not as bad as Trump’s refusal, in advance of the election, to acknowledge the legitimacy of an election that had not yet taken place:
-
It’s been interesting watching them lower the bar to the point where they no longer even claim to have an view based on evidence. They now pretend to derive it from first principles.
Soon they’ll completely shift the burden of proof, and demand to be convinced that the election wasn’t stolen.
@jon-nyc said in A republic, if you can keep it.:
It’s been interesting watching them lower the bar to the point where they no longer even claim to have an view based on evidence. They now pretend to derive it from first principles.
Soon they’ll completely shift the burden of proof, and demand to be convinced that the election wasn’t stolen.
Two years after 2016:
