Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Trumps lawyers in multiple states: “This is not a fraud case”

Trumps lawyers in multiple states: “This is not a fraud case”

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
23 Posts 9 Posters 145 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Catseye3C Offline
    Catseye3C Offline
    Catseye3
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Bach's post of the Pennsy judge's comments is as plain and at the same time as eloquent as it gets.

    Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

    1 Reply Last reply
    • LarryL Offline
      LarryL Offline
      Larry
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      Keep digging your hole..

      AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
      • taiwan_girlT Offline
        taiwan_girlT Offline
        taiwan_girl
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        I just posted in the other thread by President Trump lawyers said that the Pennsylvania rule was what they wanted and actually helps them. 🤪

        1 Reply Last reply
        • LarryL Larry

          Keep digging your hole..

          AxtremusA Offline
          AxtremusA Offline
          Axtremus
          wrote on last edited by Axtremus
          #10

          @Larry said in Trumps lawyers in multiple states: “This is not a fraud case”:

          Keep digging your hole..

          Can’t ... too busy watching Trump and his legal team dig their holes. 🍿 🍿

          1 Reply Last reply
          • LarryL Offline
            LarryL Offline
            Larry
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            I am SO going to enjoy watching what's coming......

            Bwahahahahaaaaaaa

            KlausK 1 Reply Last reply
            • bachophileB Offline
              bachophileB Offline
              bachophile
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              And I posted in the the other thread that Rudy is delusional

              The wording is so strong the circuit may just chuck it. And then it won’t get near SCOTUS

              Like I posted in the pathway thread, the only pathway for trump is not the courts but by hijaking electors.

              Chance of that seems slim to me.

              Catseye3C 1 Reply Last reply
              • L Offline
                L Offline
                Loki
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                I read the court’s dismissal of the Trump case. All 3x pages.

                One thing is abundantly clear. Our democracy is alive and well and thriving.

                So enough already with the sky is falling crap, please.

                taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
                • L Loki

                  I read the court’s dismissal of the Trump case. All 3x pages.

                  One thing is abundantly clear. Our democracy is alive and well and thriving.

                  So enough already with the sky is falling crap, please.

                  taiwan_girlT Offline
                  taiwan_girlT Offline
                  taiwan_girl
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  @Loki said in Trumps lawyers in multiple states: “This is not a fraud case”:

                  One thing is abundantly clear. Our democracy is alive and well and thriving.
                  So enough already with the sky is falling crap, please.

                  Agree. I am an optimist and I have say before - every four years one side or the other seems to think that the end of the world (or at least the US) is coming because their guy did not get elected. Did not happen then. Do not think it will happen now.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • bachophileB Offline
                    bachophileB Offline
                    bachophile
                    wrote on last edited by bachophile
                    #15

                    No, I would say the judicial system is working well and thriving

                    The sky will fall if the electors dont follow through on the will of the people.

                    Then that will be the end of democracy.

                    But honestly, I doubt that also will happen.

                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    • bachophileB bachophile

                      And I posted in the the other thread that Rudy is delusional

                      The wording is so strong the circuit may just chuck it. And then it won’t get near SCOTUS

                      Like I posted in the pathway thread, the only pathway for trump is not the courts but by hijaking electors.

                      Chance of that seems slim to me.

                      Catseye3C Offline
                      Catseye3C Offline
                      Catseye3
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      @bachophile said in Trumps lawyers in multiple states: “This is not a fraud case”:

                      Like I posted in the pathway thread, the only pathway for trump is not the courts but by hijaking electors.
                      Chance of that seems slim to me.

                      From NYT: "And another thing that history tells us . . . is that the legal bar is extremely high when it comes to invalidating the votes of American citizens. Even if they are proved, the irregularities have to be substantial enough to alter the outcome of a race.

                      “The prevailing view today is that courts should not invalidate election results because of problems unless it is shown that the problems were of such magnitude to negate the validity of which candidate prevailed,” Edward Foley, an elections law expert at Ohio State University’s Moritz College of Law, said. This tends to be hard to demonstrate, he said, since it’s hard to show which candidate a disputed ballot was intended to be cast for.

                      Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • LarryL Offline
                        LarryL Offline
                        Larry
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        Are you sure you know what the will of the people is?

                        I suggest some of you stock up on Maalox....,

                        Bwahagahaaaaaaa

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • bachophileB bachophile

                          No, I would say the judicial system is working well and thriving

                          The sky will fall if the electors dont follow through on the will of the people.

                          Then that will be the end of democracy.

                          But honestly, I doubt that also will happen.

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Loki
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          @bachophile said in Trumps lawyers in multiple states: “This is not a fraud case”:

                          No, I would say the judicial system is working well and thriving

                          The sky will fall if the electors dont follow through on the will of the people.

                          Then that will be the end of democracy.

                          But honestly, I doubt that also will happen.

                          First time in my life I encountered faithless electors and one side tried to use it was, wait for it.....2016.

                          It was such a cool idea then. What happened? L. 0. L.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • LarryL Larry

                            I am SO going to enjoy watching what's coming......

                            Bwahahahahaaaaaaa

                            KlausK Offline
                            KlausK Offline
                            Klaus
                            wrote on last edited by Klaus
                            #19

                            @Larry said in Trumps lawyers in multiple states: “This is not a fraud case”:

                            I am SO going to enjoy watching what's coming......

                            Bwahahahahaaaaaaa

                            And the next day, when you've been proven wrong, you'll change your tune again to "America is lost, only idiots, I'll sell everything and move elsewhere" rather than "I was wrong".

                            LarryL 1 Reply Last reply
                            • LarryL Offline
                              LarryL Offline
                              Larry
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #20

                              Oh, I intend to sell everything no matter what. I still have no faith in our government any more. Nothing ive said has been inconsistent. I still think this world is being overrun by idiots and sheep. Im just going to enjoy watching the Leftwingers' heads explode in the next couple of weeks. The only question in my mind is if any of them will have their eyes opened, or if they're terminally sheep.

                              Hahahahaha

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • KlausK Klaus

                                @Larry said in Trumps lawyers in multiple states: “This is not a fraud case”:

                                I am SO going to enjoy watching what's coming......

                                Bwahahahahaaaaaaa

                                And the next day, when you've been proven wrong, you'll change your tune again to "America is lost, only idiots, I'll sell everything and move elsewhere" rather than "I was wrong".

                                LarryL Offline
                                LarryL Offline
                                Larry
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #21

                                @Klaus said in Trumps lawyers in multiple states: “This is not a fraud case”:

                                @Larry said in Trumps lawyers in multiple states: “This is not a fraud case”:

                                I am SO going to enjoy watching what's coming......

                                Bwahahahahaaaaaaa

                                And the next day, when you've been proven wrong, you'll change your tune again to "America is lost, only idiots, I'll sell everything and move elsewhere" rather than "I was wrong".

                                So.... what are YOU going to do when YOU are proven wrong??? Get ready for it..... You're going to come face to face with that one...... soon.... lol

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • KlausK Offline
                                  KlausK Offline
                                  Klaus
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #22

                                  I haven't said anything in this thread besides my comment to you, hence it is a little hard to prove me wrong (or right).

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • LarryL Offline
                                    LarryL Offline
                                    Larry
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #23

                                    Then why are you declaring ME wrong?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Login

                                    • Don't have an account? Register

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • Users
                                    • Groups