Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Dominion lawyers up.

Dominion lawyers up.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
32 Posts 8 Posters 192 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Offline
    JollyJ Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-dominion-backs-out-of-hearing-before-penn-legislature?fbclid=IwAR2Jo-IyTz3DU7Va6PDxRjN0zU9vjB0fw1im3-NPy6ZBSE0JoDWrsQ3oQX0

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    1 Reply Last reply
    • X Offline
      X Offline
      xenon
      wrote on last edited by xenon
      #2

      Why are dominion systems in the spotlight when you can easily do a manual recount? They're used to count votes.

      How do the machines lead to fraud? If there is fraud, it should be super easy to check (Georgia already went through an exercise).

      If I were getting as much heat as Dominion, I would definitely not talk to anyone without lawyering up.

      The circus around them has proven to be ridiculous to date.

      CopperC 1 Reply Last reply
      • X xenon

        Why are dominion systems in the spotlight when you can easily do a manual recount? They're used to count votes.

        How do the machines lead to fraud? If there is fraud, it should be super easy to check (Georgia already went through an exercise).

        If I were getting as much heat as Dominion, I would definitely not talk to anyone without lawyering up.

        The circus around them has proven to be ridiculous to date.

        CopperC Offline
        CopperC Offline
        Copper
        wrote on last edited by Copper
        #3

        @xenon said in Dominion lawyers up.:

        How do the machines lead to fraud?

        In at least one County the Dominion machines electronically turned Trump votes into Biden votes.

        I don't think this is disputed by anyone.

        I believe the questions not answered are, how many other machines did this? And was this intentional?

        The Biden people believe this was simple human error, this is wishful thinking.

        The Trump people believe this was intentional, this is wishful thinking.

        Someday we'll know the answers.

        X 1 Reply Last reply
        • CopperC Copper

          @xenon said in Dominion lawyers up.:

          How do the machines lead to fraud?

          In at least one County the Dominion machines electronically turned Trump votes into Biden votes.

          I don't think this is disputed by anyone.

          I believe the questions not answered are, how many other machines did this? And was this intentional?

          The Biden people believe this was simple human error, this is wishful thinking.

          The Trump people believe this was intentional, this is wishful thinking.

          Someday we'll know the answers.

          X Offline
          X Offline
          xenon
          wrote on last edited by xenon
          #4

          @Copper said in Dominion lawyers up.:

          @xenon said in Dominion lawyers up.:

          How do the machines lead to fraud?

          In at least one County the Dominion machines electronically turned Trump votes into Biden votes.

          I don't think this is disputed by anyone.

          I believe the questions not answered are, how many other machines did this? And was this intentional?

          The Biden people believe this was simple human error, this is wishful thinking.

          The Trump people believe this was intentional, this is wishful thinking.

          Someday we'll know the answers.

          They didn't turn votes into anything. It's like a scantron sheet, if you're familiar with those. The voting machine can't change ballots.

          You need to set the parameters of the scanner so it can read the ballot correctly. The person who setup the counter set it up incorrectly before running the ballots through.

          A manual recount solves this issue. As does a spot check on ballot error rate (many states use this) - to make sure a random sampling of ballots matches the split of the full population.

          CopperC 1 Reply Last reply
          • X xenon

            @Copper said in Dominion lawyers up.:

            @xenon said in Dominion lawyers up.:

            How do the machines lead to fraud?

            In at least one County the Dominion machines electronically turned Trump votes into Biden votes.

            I don't think this is disputed by anyone.

            I believe the questions not answered are, how many other machines did this? And was this intentional?

            The Biden people believe this was simple human error, this is wishful thinking.

            The Trump people believe this was intentional, this is wishful thinking.

            Someday we'll know the answers.

            They didn't turn votes into anything. It's like a scantron sheet, if you're familiar with those. The voting machine can't change ballots.

            You need to set the parameters of the scanner so it can read the ballot correctly. The person who setup the counter set it up incorrectly before running the ballots through.

            A manual recount solves this issue. As does a spot check on ballot error rate (many states use this) - to make sure a random sampling of ballots matches the split of the full population.

            CopperC Offline
            CopperC Offline
            Copper
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @xenon said in Dominion lawyers up.:

            @Copper said in Dominion lawyers up.:

            @xenon said in Dominion lawyers up.:

            How do the machines lead to fraud?

            In at least one County the Dominion machines electronically turned Trump votes into Biden votes.

            I don't think this is disputed by anyone.

            I believe the questions not answered are, how many other machines did this? And was this intentional?

            The Biden people believe this was simple human error, this is wishful thinking.

            The Trump people believe this was intentional, this is wishful thinking.

            Someday we'll know the answers.

            They didn't turn votes into anything. It's like a scantron sheet, if you're familiar with those. The voting machine can't change ballots.

            You need to set the parameters of the scanner so it can read the ballot correctly. The person who setup the counter set it up incorrectly before running the ballots through.

            A manual recount solves this issue. As does a spot check on ballot error rate (many states use this) - to make sure a random sampling of ballots matches the split of the full population.

            So what?

            The machine gave an invalid vote count in Mr. Biden's favor.

            It happened, really.

            It was fixed almost immediately.

            The questions remain. How many other machines? Was it intentional?

            X 1 Reply Last reply
            • CopperC Copper

              @xenon said in Dominion lawyers up.:

              @Copper said in Dominion lawyers up.:

              @xenon said in Dominion lawyers up.:

              How do the machines lead to fraud?

              In at least one County the Dominion machines electronically turned Trump votes into Biden votes.

              I don't think this is disputed by anyone.

              I believe the questions not answered are, how many other machines did this? And was this intentional?

              The Biden people believe this was simple human error, this is wishful thinking.

              The Trump people believe this was intentional, this is wishful thinking.

              Someday we'll know the answers.

              They didn't turn votes into anything. It's like a scantron sheet, if you're familiar with those. The voting machine can't change ballots.

              You need to set the parameters of the scanner so it can read the ballot correctly. The person who setup the counter set it up incorrectly before running the ballots through.

              A manual recount solves this issue. As does a spot check on ballot error rate (many states use this) - to make sure a random sampling of ballots matches the split of the full population.

              So what?

              The machine gave an invalid vote count in Mr. Biden's favor.

              It happened, really.

              It was fixed almost immediately.

              The questions remain. How many other machines? Was it intentional?

              X Offline
              X Offline
              xenon
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @Copper said in Dominion lawyers up.:

              @xenon said in Dominion lawyers up.:

              @Copper said in Dominion lawyers up.:

              @xenon said in Dominion lawyers up.:

              How do the machines lead to fraud?

              In at least one County the Dominion machines electronically turned Trump votes into Biden votes.

              I don't think this is disputed by anyone.

              I believe the questions not answered are, how many other machines did this? And was this intentional?

              The Biden people believe this was simple human error, this is wishful thinking.

              The Trump people believe this was intentional, this is wishful thinking.

              Someday we'll know the answers.

              They didn't turn votes into anything. It's like a scantron sheet, if you're familiar with those. The voting machine can't change ballots.

              You need to set the parameters of the scanner so it can read the ballot correctly. The person who setup the counter set it up incorrectly before running the ballots through.

              A manual recount solves this issue. As does a spot check on ballot error rate (many states use this) - to make sure a random sampling of ballots matches the split of the full population.

              So what?

              The machine gave an invalid vote count in Mr. Biden's favor.

              It happened, really.

              It was fixed almost immediately.

              The questions remain. How many other machines? Was it intentional?

              You can put any number of safeguards, tools, processes in, and you'll never remove the element of human error.

              What helps is having safeguards on the back end (like manual spot checks, etc.) - to try and catch large errors.

              In the most publicized case - partisanship / intentional misconduct didn't seem to play a role (Tina Barton was the name of the Republican clerk in charge of the county I think)

              And they did have safeguards in place if the clerks didn't catch it:

              “Even if the error in the reported unofficial results had not been quickly noticed, it would have been identified during the county canvass,” department officials added. “The software did not cause a misallocation of votes; it was a result of user human error.”

              CopperC 1 Reply Last reply
              • JollyJ Offline
                JollyJ Offline
                Jolly
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Yep, nothing like a Venezuelan product with servers outside of the U.S.

                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                X jon-nycJ 2 Replies Last reply
                • JollyJ Jolly

                  Yep, nothing like a Venezuelan product with servers outside of the U.S.

                  X Offline
                  X Offline
                  xenon
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @Jolly What are you saying? I'm actually interested in your argument from a technical perspective, I do a lot of data center work.

                  JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  • X xenon

                    @Jolly What are you saying? I'm actually interested in your argument from a technical perspective, I do a lot of data center work.

                    JollyJ Offline
                    JollyJ Offline
                    Jolly
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    @xenon said in Dominion lawyers up.:

                    @Jolly What are you saying? I'm actually interested in your argument from a technical perspective, I do a lot of data center work.

                    Do some reading on possible backdoors in the software, where the software originated, the origins of the company that sold it and alleged dirty deeds done with it in other countries.

                    It may be pure BS. Or not.

                    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • JollyJ Jolly

                      Yep, nothing like a Venezuelan product with servers outside of the U.S.

                      jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @Jolly said in Dominion lawyers up.:

                      Yep, nothing like a Venezuelan product with servers outside of the U.S.

                      Just wait until the GA hand recount blows the doors off this fraud....

                      Oh wait.

                      Only non-witches get due process.

                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ Offline
                        jon-nycJ Offline
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Meanwhile, I read Dominion is a Colorado company.

                        What’s the actual story?

                        Only non-witches get due process.

                        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • jon-nycJ Offline
                          jon-nycJ Offline
                          jon-nyc
                          wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                          #12

                          So here is the Wikipedia entry on the company from before the election. From September 2020.

                          https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dominion_Voting_Systems&oldid=978653274

                          Only non-witches get due process.

                          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • X xenon

                            @Copper said in Dominion lawyers up.:

                            @xenon said in Dominion lawyers up.:

                            @Copper said in Dominion lawyers up.:

                            @xenon said in Dominion lawyers up.:

                            How do the machines lead to fraud?

                            In at least one County the Dominion machines electronically turned Trump votes into Biden votes.

                            I don't think this is disputed by anyone.

                            I believe the questions not answered are, how many other machines did this? And was this intentional?

                            The Biden people believe this was simple human error, this is wishful thinking.

                            The Trump people believe this was intentional, this is wishful thinking.

                            Someday we'll know the answers.

                            They didn't turn votes into anything. It's like a scantron sheet, if you're familiar with those. The voting machine can't change ballots.

                            You need to set the parameters of the scanner so it can read the ballot correctly. The person who setup the counter set it up incorrectly before running the ballots through.

                            A manual recount solves this issue. As does a spot check on ballot error rate (many states use this) - to make sure a random sampling of ballots matches the split of the full population.

                            So what?

                            The machine gave an invalid vote count in Mr. Biden's favor.

                            It happened, really.

                            It was fixed almost immediately.

                            The questions remain. How many other machines? Was it intentional?

                            You can put any number of safeguards, tools, processes in, and you'll never remove the element of human error.

                            What helps is having safeguards on the back end (like manual spot checks, etc.) - to try and catch large errors.

                            In the most publicized case - partisanship / intentional misconduct didn't seem to play a role (Tina Barton was the name of the Republican clerk in charge of the county I think)

                            And they did have safeguards in place if the clerks didn't catch it:

                            “Even if the error in the reported unofficial results had not been quickly noticed, it would have been identified during the county canvass,” department officials added. “The software did not cause a misallocation of votes; it was a result of user human error.”

                            CopperC Offline
                            CopperC Offline
                            Copper
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            @xenon said in Dominion lawyers up.:

                            @Copper said in Dominion lawyers up.:

                            @xenon said in Dominion lawyers up.:

                            @Copper said in Dominion lawyers up.:

                            @xenon said in Dominion lawyers up.:

                            How do the machines lead to fraud?

                            In at least one County the Dominion machines electronically turned Trump votes into Biden votes.

                            I don't think this is disputed by anyone.

                            I believe the questions not answered are, how many other machines did this? And was this intentional?

                            The Biden people believe this was simple human error, this is wishful thinking.

                            The Trump people believe this was intentional, this is wishful thinking.

                            Someday we'll know the answers.

                            They didn't turn votes into anything. It's like a scantron sheet, if you're familiar with those. The voting machine can't change ballots.

                            You need to set the parameters of the scanner so it can read the ballot correctly. The person who setup the counter set it up incorrectly before running the ballots through.

                            A manual recount solves this issue. As does a spot check on ballot error rate (many states use this) - to make sure a random sampling of ballots matches the split of the full population.

                            So what?

                            The machine gave an invalid vote count in Mr. Biden's favor.

                            It happened, really.

                            It was fixed almost immediately.

                            The questions remain. How many other machines? Was it intentional?

                            You can put any number of safeguards, tools, processes in, and you'll never remove the element of human error.

                            What helps is having safeguards on the back end (like manual spot checks, etc.) - to try and catch large errors.

                            In the most publicized case - partisanship / intentional misconduct didn't seem to play a role (Tina Barton was the name of the Republican clerk in charge of the county I think)

                            And they did have safeguards in place if the clerks didn't catch it:

                            “Even if the error in the reported unofficial results had not been quickly noticed, it would have been identified during the county canvass,” department officials added. “The software did not cause a misallocation of votes; it was a result of user human error.”

                            How many other machines? Was it intentional?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • jon-nycJ Offline
                              jon-nycJ Offline
                              jon-nyc
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              They’re in 1600 districts in the US including the entire state of Georgia.

                              You’d think at least somewhere in GA there’d be a red county with the courage to tell us about how the machine needs ink refills and blank paper the size of ballots. And a little shredder box that needs to be emptied from time to time.

                              Strange.

                              Only non-witches get due process.

                              • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • jon-nycJ Offline
                                jon-nycJ Offline
                                jon-nyc
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                By the way the machine looks familiar. I think we use these here.

                                083C997C-D483-4060-8E2D-8262B3F61AB3.jpeg

                                Only non-witches get due process.

                                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • jon-nycJ Offline
                                  jon-nycJ Offline
                                  jon-nyc
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  They were already in 22 states before the election of 2016, according to their Wikipedia page from August of 2016.

                                  Our President assured me they were only in the 6 states with outcomes he doesn’t like.

                                  Somebody’s not telling the truth.

                                  Only non-witches get due process.

                                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                    Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                    Doctor Phibes
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    Rudy had claimed that Dominion was owned by Smartmatic which had Venezuelan connections, but I'd read elsewhere that Smartmatic was actually a competitor of Dominion.

                                    It's hard to make sense of any of these claims. It's not clear at all what's true, but Rudy's attacks so far have been pretty farcical, so it could easily be the case that there is no connection to Venezuela.

                                    https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-afs:Content:9740535009

                                    It's AP news, so take it for what it's worth. Most of the sites claiming Dominion is Venezuelan appear to be more commentary than actual news - I'm being polite, here.

                                    I was only joking

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                      Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                      Doctor Phibes
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      Here's a BBC fact-check

                                      https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-55016029

                                      It sounds to me that the claim that Dominion is Venezuelan is just untrue.

                                      I was only joking

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • JollyJ Offline
                                        JollyJ Offline
                                        Jolly
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        I guess Warren and Klobuchar loved 'em...

                                        https://www.warren.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/H.I.G. McCarthy, & Staple Street letters.pdf

                                        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • jon-nycJ Offline
                                          jon-nycJ Offline
                                          jon-nyc
                                          wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                                          #20

                                          Smartmatic was founded by two Venezuelans and has had technology controversies. Here is their last wiki page before post-election editing began, Seems like minimal usage in the US and no relation to Dominion is mentioned.

                                          Maybe Rudy and Sidney just liked this backstory better, so they decided to apply it to dominion?

                                          https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Smartmatic&oldid=985329147

                                          Only non-witches get due process.

                                          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups