Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. 80 Million

80 Million

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
37 Posts 12 Posters 391 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    Loki
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    What does greater margin mean. That is quite the statement.

    To me margin would be expressed as percentage. Did I miss new math?

    jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
    • L Offline
      L Offline
      Loki
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      Hello AP. This is a good margin analysis for you.

      https://www.statista.com/statistics/1035992/winning-margins-us-presidential-elections-since-1789/

      1 Reply Last reply
      • kluursK Offline
        kluursK Offline
        kluurs
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        They need to hire Aqua as an editor.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • L Loki

          What does greater margin mean. That is quite the statement.

          To me margin would be expressed as percentage. Did I miss new math?

          jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nyc
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          @Loki said in 80 Million:

          What does greater margin mean. That is quite the statement.

          To me margin would be expressed as percentage. Did I miss new math?

          No, you missed standard English usage. Just google up the phrase “by a margin of” in quotes and see how it’s used.

          Only non-witches get due process.

          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
          L 1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

            LarryL Offline
            LarryL Offline
            Larry
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            @jon-nyc said in 80 Million:

            You believe that?

            Bahahahahaaaa

            X 1 Reply Last reply
            • LarryL Larry

              @jon-nyc said in 80 Million:

              You believe that?

              Bahahahahaaaa

              X Offline
              X Offline
              xenon
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              @Larry said in 80 Million:

              @jon-nyc said in 80 Million:

              You believe that?

              Bahahahahaaaa

              Remember when Trump claimed 3-5M fake votes. Started a commission to look into it, and found nothing?

              See, now that's funny.

              LarryL JollyJ 2 Replies Last reply
              • A Offline
                A Offline
                AndyD
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                fb9e2997-00dd-4ddb-8f62-3f56ea3c0ef1-image.png

                1 Reply Last reply
                • X xenon

                  @Larry said in 80 Million:

                  @jon-nyc said in 80 Million:

                  You believe that?

                  Bahahahahaaaa

                  Remember when Trump claimed 3-5M fake votes. Started a commission to look into it, and found nothing?

                  See, now that's funny.

                  LarryL Offline
                  LarryL Offline
                  Larry
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  @xenon said in 80 Million:

                  @Larry said in 80 Million:

                  @jon-nyc said in 80 Million:

                  You believe that?

                  Bahahahahaaaa

                  Remember when Trump claimed 3-5M fake votes. Started a commission to look into it, and found nothing?

                  See, now that's funny.

                  What's funny is you thinking they found nothing.

                  X 1 Reply Last reply
                  • LarryL Larry

                    @xenon said in 80 Million:

                    @Larry said in 80 Million:

                    @jon-nyc said in 80 Million:

                    You believe that?

                    Bahahahahaaaa

                    Remember when Trump claimed 3-5M fake votes. Started a commission to look into it, and found nothing?

                    See, now that's funny.

                    What's funny is you thinking they found nothing.

                    X Offline
                    X Offline
                    xenon
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    @Larry said in 80 Million:

                    @xenon said in 80 Million:

                    @Larry said in 80 Million:

                    @jon-nyc said in 80 Million:

                    You believe that?

                    Bahahahahaaaa

                    Remember when Trump claimed 3-5M fake votes. Started a commission to look into it, and found nothing?

                    See, now that's funny.

                    What's funny is you thinking they found nothing.

                    You're right. It's all right there in the report they never produced.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • LarryL Offline
                      LarryL Offline
                      Larry
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      Think maybe you ought to wait until they finish before talking about a report?

                      X 1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                        @Loki said in 80 Million:

                        What does greater margin mean. That is quite the statement.

                        To me margin would be expressed as percentage. Did I miss new math?

                        No, you missed standard English usage. Just google up the phrase “by a margin of” in quotes and see how it’s used.

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Loki
                        wrote on last edited by Loki
                        #12

                        @jon-nyc said in 80 Million:

                        @Loki said in 80 Million:

                        What does greater margin mean. That is quite the statement.

                        To me margin would be expressed as percentage. Did I miss new math?

                        No, you missed standard English usage. Just google up the phrase “by a margin of” in quotes and see how it’s used.

                        Ok. Won by a greater margin of votes which may be useful in a recount argument but says nothing of how close the race was compared to other elections.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • X xenon

                          @Larry said in 80 Million:

                          @jon-nyc said in 80 Million:

                          You believe that?

                          Bahahahahaaaa

                          Remember when Trump claimed 3-5M fake votes. Started a commission to look into it, and found nothing?

                          See, now that's funny.

                          JollyJ Offline
                          JollyJ Offline
                          Jolly
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          @xenon said in 80 Million:

                          @Larry said in 80 Million:

                          @jon-nyc said in 80 Million:

                          You believe that?

                          Bahahahahaaaa

                          Remember when Trump claimed 3-5M fake votes. Started a commission to look into it, and found nothing?

                          See, now that's funny.

                          What's funny is all those precincts with 80%+ turnout.

                          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                          AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                          • JollyJ Jolly

                            @xenon said in 80 Million:

                            @Larry said in 80 Million:

                            @jon-nyc said in 80 Million:

                            You believe that?

                            Bahahahahaaaa

                            Remember when Trump claimed 3-5M fake votes. Started a commission to look into it, and found nothing?

                            See, now that's funny.

                            What's funny is all those precincts with 80%+ turnout.

                            AxtremusA Offline
                            AxtremusA Offline
                            Axtremus
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            @Jolly said in 80 Million:

                            What's funny is all those precincts with 80%+ turnout.

                            You suffer from the tyranny of low expectations, and your cynicism is doing a disservice towards your fellow countrymen.

                            You should cheer and congratulate your fellow countryman for high turnout, not ridicule them for it.

                            JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                            • AxtremusA Axtremus

                              @Jolly said in 80 Million:

                              What's funny is all those precincts with 80%+ turnout.

                              You suffer from the tyranny of low expectations, and your cynicism is doing a disservice towards your fellow countrymen.

                              You should cheer and congratulate your fellow countryman for high turnout, not ridicule them for it.

                              JollyJ Offline
                              JollyJ Offline
                              Jolly
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              @Axtremus said in 80 Million:

                              @Jolly said in 80 Million:

                              What's funny is all those precincts with 80%+ turnout.

                              You suffer from the tyranny of low expectations, and your cynicism is doing a disservice towards your fellow countrymen.

                              You should cheer and congratulate your fellow countryman for high turnout, not ridicule them for it.

                              I do cheer all the sentient and alive ones.

                              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                              taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
                              • JollyJ Jolly

                                @Axtremus said in 80 Million:

                                @Jolly said in 80 Million:

                                What's funny is all those precincts with 80%+ turnout.

                                You suffer from the tyranny of low expectations, and your cynicism is doing a disservice towards your fellow countrymen.

                                You should cheer and congratulate your fellow countryman for high turnout, not ridicule them for it.

                                I do cheer all the sentient and alive ones.

                                taiwan_girlT Offline
                                taiwan_girlT Offline
                                taiwan_girl
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                @Jolly @Larry It is always difficult when something goes against something you believe in very strongly, or have a lot of belief in. It is difficult for the mind to “rationalize” it. And because of personal bias, the mind does not want to accept the outcome or thinks there must be some reason that caused this to happen.

                                It happened in 2016. Hillary Clinton supporters could not understand how President Trump could have won. “It is it possible. Everyone I talked to supported her. Why don’t other people see and understand what I see? There must have been something else!”

                                It happens often when a family member commits a crime. “There is no way that they did. I know them. Something else MUST have happened. They did not shoplift the clothes from the store!!”

                                So, a conspiracy theory is determined that somehow fits the crime details. There was an international crime ring that just happened to be in the store at the same time. They drugged the shopper, slipped the clothes into their bag, and left them with no memory of this occurring. They also managed to avoid the security cameras, and left no trace of themselves in the store. But, this is the way it HAD to happen. Because they just KNOW.

                                Isn’t there a famous detective (Sherlock Holmes?) who said that the easiest answer is usually the most obvious one. (Or maybe vice versa)

                                I get that you (and millions others) are disappointed that President Trump is not reelected. But to try and back fit that the Democrats did this in this state, did a second thing in another state, did a third thing in another state, all the while knowing that these were the states to do it, while ignoring these states is just too wild for me.

                                The reason President elect Biden won Is that more people legally voted for him than for President Trump. Same as in 2016, when more people legally voted for President Trump over Hillary Clinton.

                                If, in 2024 President Trump decides to run again, and he wins more votes than the Democrat person, then he will be declared president.

                                Catseye3C X LarryL 3 Replies Last reply
                                • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                                  @Jolly @Larry It is always difficult when something goes against something you believe in very strongly, or have a lot of belief in. It is difficult for the mind to “rationalize” it. And because of personal bias, the mind does not want to accept the outcome or thinks there must be some reason that caused this to happen.

                                  It happened in 2016. Hillary Clinton supporters could not understand how President Trump could have won. “It is it possible. Everyone I talked to supported her. Why don’t other people see and understand what I see? There must have been something else!”

                                  It happens often when a family member commits a crime. “There is no way that they did. I know them. Something else MUST have happened. They did not shoplift the clothes from the store!!”

                                  So, a conspiracy theory is determined that somehow fits the crime details. There was an international crime ring that just happened to be in the store at the same time. They drugged the shopper, slipped the clothes into their bag, and left them with no memory of this occurring. They also managed to avoid the security cameras, and left no trace of themselves in the store. But, this is the way it HAD to happen. Because they just KNOW.

                                  Isn’t there a famous detective (Sherlock Holmes?) who said that the easiest answer is usually the most obvious one. (Or maybe vice versa)

                                  I get that you (and millions others) are disappointed that President Trump is not reelected. But to try and back fit that the Democrats did this in this state, did a second thing in another state, did a third thing in another state, all the while knowing that these were the states to do it, while ignoring these states is just too wild for me.

                                  The reason President elect Biden won Is that more people legally voted for him than for President Trump. Same as in 2016, when more people legally voted for President Trump over Hillary Clinton.

                                  If, in 2024 President Trump decides to run again, and he wins more votes than the Democrat person, then he will be declared president.

                                  Catseye3C Offline
                                  Catseye3C Offline
                                  Catseye3
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  @taiwan_girl said in 80 Million:

                                  Isn’t there a famous detective (Sherlock Holmes?) who said that the easiest answer is usually the most obvious one. (Or maybe vice versa)

                                  That is known as Occam's Razor, floated by William of Occam in the 14th century (I think). But if William hadn't said it, I bet you're right, that Sherlock Holmes would've. 🙂

                                  Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • LarryL Larry

                                    Think maybe you ought to wait until they finish before talking about a report?

                                    X Offline
                                    X Offline
                                    xenon
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #18

                                    @Larry said in 80 Million:

                                    Think maybe you ought to wait until they finish before talking about a report?

                                    The Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity was started in Jan 2017 and disbanded in Jan 2018. They were supposed to produce a report, they didn't produce a report.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                                      @Jolly @Larry It is always difficult when something goes against something you believe in very strongly, or have a lot of belief in. It is difficult for the mind to “rationalize” it. And because of personal bias, the mind does not want to accept the outcome or thinks there must be some reason that caused this to happen.

                                      It happened in 2016. Hillary Clinton supporters could not understand how President Trump could have won. “It is it possible. Everyone I talked to supported her. Why don’t other people see and understand what I see? There must have been something else!”

                                      It happens often when a family member commits a crime. “There is no way that they did. I know them. Something else MUST have happened. They did not shoplift the clothes from the store!!”

                                      So, a conspiracy theory is determined that somehow fits the crime details. There was an international crime ring that just happened to be in the store at the same time. They drugged the shopper, slipped the clothes into their bag, and left them with no memory of this occurring. They also managed to avoid the security cameras, and left no trace of themselves in the store. But, this is the way it HAD to happen. Because they just KNOW.

                                      Isn’t there a famous detective (Sherlock Holmes?) who said that the easiest answer is usually the most obvious one. (Or maybe vice versa)

                                      I get that you (and millions others) are disappointed that President Trump is not reelected. But to try and back fit that the Democrats did this in this state, did a second thing in another state, did a third thing in another state, all the while knowing that these were the states to do it, while ignoring these states is just too wild for me.

                                      The reason President elect Biden won Is that more people legally voted for him than for President Trump. Same as in 2016, when more people legally voted for President Trump over Hillary Clinton.

                                      If, in 2024 President Trump decides to run again, and he wins more votes than the Democrat person, then he will be declared president.

                                      X Offline
                                      X Offline
                                      xenon
                                      wrote on last edited by xenon
                                      #19

                                      @taiwan_girl said in 80 Million:

                                      Isn’t there a famous detective (Sherlock Holmes?) who said that the easiest answer is usually the most obvious one. (Or maybe vice versa)

                                      The easiest answer is that there's a multi-state conspiracy involving low-level poll workers. At some point we'll find their secret communications or meeting spots. Right?

                                      This year they decided to give the Presidency to the Dems, but split congress. They're a fair-minded conspiratorial bunch.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                        Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                        Doctor Phibes
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #20

                                        How does one float a razor?

                                        I was only joking

                                        Catseye3C 1 Reply Last reply
                                        • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                                          @Jolly @Larry It is always difficult when something goes against something you believe in very strongly, or have a lot of belief in. It is difficult for the mind to “rationalize” it. And because of personal bias, the mind does not want to accept the outcome or thinks there must be some reason that caused this to happen.

                                          It happened in 2016. Hillary Clinton supporters could not understand how President Trump could have won. “It is it possible. Everyone I talked to supported her. Why don’t other people see and understand what I see? There must have been something else!”

                                          It happens often when a family member commits a crime. “There is no way that they did. I know them. Something else MUST have happened. They did not shoplift the clothes from the store!!”

                                          So, a conspiracy theory is determined that somehow fits the crime details. There was an international crime ring that just happened to be in the store at the same time. They drugged the shopper, slipped the clothes into their bag, and left them with no memory of this occurring. They also managed to avoid the security cameras, and left no trace of themselves in the store. But, this is the way it HAD to happen. Because they just KNOW.

                                          Isn’t there a famous detective (Sherlock Holmes?) who said that the easiest answer is usually the most obvious one. (Or maybe vice versa)

                                          I get that you (and millions others) are disappointed that President Trump is not reelected. But to try and back fit that the Democrats did this in this state, did a second thing in another state, did a third thing in another state, all the while knowing that these were the states to do it, while ignoring these states is just too wild for me.

                                          The reason President elect Biden won Is that more people legally voted for him than for President Trump. Same as in 2016, when more people legally voted for President Trump over Hillary Clinton.

                                          If, in 2024 President Trump decides to run again, and he wins more votes than the Democrat person, then he will be declared president.

                                          LarryL Offline
                                          LarryL Offline
                                          Larry
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #21

                                          @taiwan_girl said in 80 Million:

                                          @Jolly @Larry It is always difficult when something goes against something you believe in very strongly, or have a lot of belief in. It is difficult for the mind to “rationalize” it. And because of personal bias, the mind does not want to accept the outcome or thinks there must be some reason that caused this to happen.

                                          It happened in 2016. Hillary Clinton supporters could not understand how President Trump could have won. “It is it possible. Everyone I talked to supported her. Why don’t other people see and understand what I see? There must have been something else!”

                                          It happens often when a family member commits a crime. “There is no way that they did. I know them. Something else MUST have happened. They did not shoplift the clothes from the store!!”

                                          So, a conspiracy theory is determined that somehow fits the crime details. There was an international crime ring that just happened to be in the store at the same time. They drugged the shopper, slipped the clothes into their bag, and left them with no memory of this occurring. They also managed to avoid the security cameras, and left no trace of themselves in the store. But, this is the way it HAD to happen. Because they just KNOW.

                                          Isn’t there a famous detective (Sherlock Holmes?) who said that the easiest answer is usually the most obvious one. (Or maybe vice versa)

                                          I get that you (and millions others) are disappointed that President Trump is not reelected. But to try and back fit that the Democrats did this in this state, did a second thing in another state, did a third thing in another state, all the while knowing that these were the states to do it, while ignoring these states is just too wild for me.

                                          The reason President elect Biden won Is that more people legally voted for him than for President Trump. Same as in 2016, when more people legally voted for President Trump over Hillary Clinton.

                                          If, in 2024 President Trump decides to run again, and he wins more votes than the Democrat person, then he will be declared president.

                                          The really sad part of your post is that you seem incapable of seeing that you are rationalizing your own personal bias, and then citing false assumptions as fact, and basically telling us "I'm right and you are wrong, get over it and give up. And no I won't open my mind to the possibility that I'm wrong because I'm not wrong - So there"..

                                          "The reason that 'President elect Biden won is that more people legally voted for him" is a tortured string of bull shit. First, Biden is not the President elect. He may very well be president elect in the future, but right now he is not. So stop demanding that we call him that when it's not the case, and stop talking down to us because we won't give in to your bull shit. Second, as of this moment, Biden has not won anything. He very well be declared the winner in the future, but right now he has not won anything. So stop demanding that we call him the winner when that is not the case, and stop talking down to us because we won't give in to your bull shit. Third, the entire reason for what's going on right now is that it is very doubtful that his vote count is all legal votes. YOU don't get to tell us his vote count is all legal because YOU don't know that for a fact any more than we know it wasn't. That's why they are investigating. So do NOT talk down to me and tell me or anyone else that a man who hasn't been declared the winner whose vote count is being investigated is the winner based on legal votes. You don't know that, you can't prove that, so stop with the condescending "You guys just give up, I'm right you're wrong" bull shit.

                                          JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups