Can we at least end one narrative?
-
@George-K said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
@Nunatax said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
a rejection of Trump
More people voted for Trump than for any other President in history. I'm more than willing to concede that he lost the popular vote, but 70,000,000 votes hardly qualifies as a "rejection."
And those 70 million were called "chumps" by the apparent winner.
Uniter, indeed.
Indeed. +1
-
-
As a people, we would make significant progress if we could find it in ourselves to acknowledge that both X-tremes, left and right, are problematical and burdensome. It isn't a matter of, oh the left is more awful or the right is more awful -- when what either of those positions boils down to is lack of understanding, lack of meeting of the minds, and disagreement with ME.
-
@George-K said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
@brenda said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
Uniter, indeed.
Indeed. +1
Never forget which candidate, during the debates, called the other one "a clown" and told him to "shut up."
I guess that counts as occasionally impolite, right?
George, are you actually trying to claim that Donald Trump behaved with more class than Joe Biden during this election period?
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
George, are you actually trying to claim that Donald Trump behaved with more class than Joe Biden during this election period?
Of course not. I'm just disputing the civility that Biden claims, you chump.
-
Civility is a relative construct, like an Alabama wedding.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
Civility is a relative construct, like an Alabama wedding.
When he insulted the 70 million people who voted for Trump, he has no standing in saying "no blue or red states."
Remember when Obama said that? Good times, good times, bitter clinger.
-
If the two candidates had 'asshole' jars, where they had to put a dollar in every time they acted like an asshole, I think I know who'd be paying for the WH Christmas party.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
If the two candidates had 'asshole' jars, where they had to put a dollar in every time they acted like an asshole, I think I know who'd be paying for the WH Christmas party.
I agree. But they're both assholes, and for one to pretend he's not is pretty funny.
-
@Catseye3 said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
As a people, we would make significant progress if we could find it in ourselves to acknowledge that both X-tremes, left and right, are problematical and burdensome. It isn't a matter of, oh the left is more awful or the right is more awful -- when what either of those positions boils down to is lack of understanding, lack of meeting of the minds, and disagreement with ME.
Left and right aren't extremes. That's the whole point of a 2 party system. It's when a side goes too far to the left or right and become extremists. The center has shifted over the years to the left. I watched as the right became what used to be the center, and the left move further left. Under Obama the left moved further left, and the corruption the Clintons brought to the democrat party became weaponized by Obama. This hard left shift gave the Socialists an opening, the Republican had become a mixed bag of true conservatives, those who chose to move left so they could get the perks afforded them, and some who were quite frankly morons. We as a nation have moved the center so far to the left that anyone born after 1990 dont even see it. The left is SO far left now that they see any hint of being a conservative as being an extremist. Yet the last good president the democrat party produced was John Kennedy, and he would be rejected by today's democrat party as a far right extremist. I don't think he would even want to be a democrat today.
-
JFK's monetary policy alone, would place him far to the right of Biden who is considered a centrist in the Demonrat party.
-
@George-K said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
@Nunatax said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
a rejection of Trump
More people voted for Trump than for any other President in history. I'm more than willing to concede that he lost the popular vote, but 70,000,000 votes hardly qualifies as a "rejection."
And those 70 million were called "chumps" by the apparent winner.
Uniter, indeed.
Sure, and the left should take a long hard look at the number of people who voted for Trump. But does that matter when wondering about the motivation of those who changed their 2016 Trump vote to a Biden vote this year? I would expect that the ones who did were mostly swing voters. Maybe they bought the narrative of the (far) left, but somehow I doubt that given that the same flip was not observed in senate or house. Maybe they feel the same about Trump as 4 years ago or even think he did better than expected, but simply preferred Biden and his policies. I doubt that for the same reason. That’s why I think those voters rejected Trump. Obviously the 70 million who voted for Trump, did not reject him.
Also, apart from “the dems have stolen the election with massive voter fraud!!!” I haven’t seen any other theories. Did he mess up the Covid crisis and was it that that cost him the election? Was it just bad luck with the Covid crisis that messed up the economy but the voters still blamed him? Were there simply too many of his policies they didn’t like?
-
@Nunatax said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
@George-K said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
@Nunatax said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
a rejection of Trump
More people voted for Trump than for any other President in history. I'm more than willing to concede that he lost the popular vote, but 70,000,000 votes hardly qualifies as a "rejection."
And those 70 million were called "chumps" by the apparent winner.
Uniter, indeed.
Sure, and the left should take a long hard look at the number of people who voted for Trump. But does that matter when wondering about the motivation of those who changed their 2016 Trump vote to a Biden vote this year? I would expect that the ones who did were mostly swing voters. Maybe they bought the narrative of the (far) left, but somehow I doubt that given that the same flip was not observed in senate or house. Maybe they feel the same about Trump as 4 years ago or even think he did better than expected, but simply preferred Biden and his policies. I doubt that for the same reason. That’s why I think those voters rejected Trump. Obviously the 70 million who voted for Trump, did not reject him.
Also, apart from “the dems have stolen the election with massive voter fraud!!!” I haven’t seen any other theories. Did he mess up the Covid crisis and was it that that cost him the election? Was it just bad luck with the Covid crisis that messed up the economy but the voters still blamed him? Were there simply too many of his policies they didn’t like?
COVID, personality and mail-in ballots.
-
@Jolly said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
COVID, personality and mail-in ballots.
Not COVID per se, but Trump’s incompetent management of it.
Not merely personality but character, a few more voters became aware of how bad Trump’s is and decided that character matters.
Not mail-in ballots per se but increased access, that’s a good thing.
-
#1) there may be a few that switched from Trump to Biden, but not many. This time they just brought more new voters...
- Trump managed the details just fine. They did a tremendous job ramping up the PPE production, ventilators, and other material goods. The things he could control, he did well. Where he screwed up was in not delivering the message clearly enough about most of this needing to be managed from a local level, and when the Chloroquine crap started up, he should have publicly and loudly come down on the media for the crap they pulled.
-
@Axtremus said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
@Jolly said in Can we at least end one narrative?:
COVID, personality and mail-in ballots.
Not COVID per se, but Trump’s incompetent management of it.
Not merely personality but character, a few more voters became aware of how bad Trump’s is and decided that character matters.
Not mail-in ballots per se but increased access, that’s a good thing.
The claim that Trump mishandled the response to the China virus is one of the dumbest bits of propaganda the democrats came up with, and the only ones still saying it are complete morons.
The same when it comes to the attack on Trumps character. No one who supports and defends baby killing has any right to question anyone's character.