12 vs. 20,000
-
wrote on 1 Nov 2020, 15:38 last edited by
In other words, Biden rallies are all staged, and no one is interested in attending one.
-
wrote on 1 Nov 2020, 18:05 last edited by
Either of you attended a Trump rally since April?
-
wrote on 1 Nov 2020, 18:31 last edited by
Why? Are you planning on claiming 20,000 plus crowds are staged too?
-
wrote on 1 Nov 2020, 21:23 last edited by
Just checking whether attending a Trump rally (or not) has anything to do with you voting for Trump (or not).
-
wrote on 1 Nov 2020, 22:35 last edited by
Nope. But it's a good indicator of his popularity. It's amusing watching dimocraps try to make excuses for the fact that Biden can't draw enough people to one of his rallies to fill a minivan. Its like saying "yeah, no one is playing that record on the radio, but that doesn't mean it's not going to sell 20 million copies."
Biden will get votes from the brain dead like you who will vote democrat no matter who is running, he will get votes from the low information voters who don't have a clue what's going on, and he will get votes from those who want to go back to raping the nation in order to line their own pockets. But Biden will not get one single vote from a sane, well informed, patriotic American.
-
wrote on 1 Nov 2020, 22:39 last edited by
Eh, drawing a crowd and getting the votes aren’t the same thing. You just proved it yourself — Trump failed to draw you into his crowds, but Trump for your vote anyway.
-
wrote on 1 Nov 2020, 22:43 last edited by
You have to be the stupidest dimwit on the planet.
-
wrote on 1 Nov 2020, 22:45 last edited by
I'm sure if Trump loses the election, he can say he won the battle of the rallies.
Similarly, if Biden loses, he can be secure in the knowledge that he won all of the opinion polls.
Either way, it will be a moral victory for the loser for them to tell their grandchildren about in their far off dotage.
-
I'm sure if Trump loses the election, he can say he won the battle of the rallies.
Similarly, if Biden loses, he can be secure in the knowledge that he won all of the opinion polls.
Either way, it will be a moral victory for the loser for them to tell their grandchildren about in their far off dotage.
wrote on 1 Nov 2020, 22:47 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in 12 vs. 20,000:
a moral victory for the loser for them to tell their grandchildren about in their far off dotage.
Which is, what, 18 months away?
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in 12 vs. 20,000:
a moral victory for the loser for them to tell their grandchildren about in their far off dotage.
Which is, what, 18 months away?
wrote on 1 Nov 2020, 22:48 last edited by@George-K said in 12 vs. 20,000:
@Doctor-Phibes said in 12 vs. 20,000:
a moral victory for the loser for them to tell their grandchildren about in their far off dotage.
Which is, what, 18 months away?
Ever the optimist, George. More like 18 months ago.
-
I'm sure if Trump loses the election, he can say he won the battle of the rallies.
Similarly, if Biden loses, he can be secure in the knowledge that he won all of the opinion polls.
Either way, it will be a moral victory for the loser for them to tell their grandchildren about in their far off dotage.
wrote on 1 Nov 2020, 22:50 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in 12 vs. 20,000:
I'm sure if Trump loses the election, he can say he won the battle of the rallies.
Similarly, if Biden loses, he can be secure in the knowledge that he won all of the opinion polls.
Either way, it will be a moral victory for the loser for them to tell their grandchildren about in their far off dotage.
Hillary won all the opinion polls too.
If Biden wins you'll be explaining to your grandchildren why they are starving to death.
-
wrote on 1 Nov 2020, 22:56 last edited by Doctor Phibes 11 Jan 2020, 22:56
A careful reader of my posts will note that I have restrained myself from making confident predictions about the election result, since one runs a significant danger of looking like a complete tool come Wednesday, and I've already got a bit of a headstart in that regard.
-
wrote on 1 Nov 2020, 23:02 last edited by
@Doctor-Phibes said in 12 vs. 20,000:
A careful reader of my posts will note that I have restrained myself from making confident predictions about the election result, since one runs a significant danger of looking like a complete tool come Wednesday, and I've already got a bit of a headstart in that regard.
Yup. I agree. There's just too much uncertainty, and considering we won't see "official" results for a while, unless there's a blowout for either candidate, it's going to be weeks before we know.
-
wrote on 1 Nov 2020, 23:05 last edited by
I know. There's way too many dumb people these days to trust they'll vote intelligently.