Thievery, most foul?
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:
The bullshit was Tucker's mysteriously disappearing letter. He hasn't looked that silly since he dumped the bow-tie.
Hopefully he has photocopies.
Wouldn't that be fun?
wrote on 29 Oct 2020, 17:20 last edited by@Jolly said in Thievery, most foul?:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:
The bullshit was Tucker's mysteriously disappearing letter. He hasn't looked that silly since he dumped the bow-tie.
Hopefully he has photocopies.
Wouldn't that be fun?
It was only photocopies that were sent. They still have the documents.
-
wrote on 29 Oct 2020, 18:36 last edited by
A story about a missing document is a nothing burger compared to the documents themselves. This is comical at this moment. Let’s see the document or go hide somewhere.
-
@Loki said in Thievery, most foul?:
@George-K said in Thievery, most foul?:
I find it impossible to believe that, if it were so damning, there are not other copies.
Exactly. This story doesn’t pass the giggle test.
It also completely undermines Tucker Carlson's credibility if he can't produce the documents.
wrote on 29 Oct 2020, 21:24 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:
@Loki said in Thievery, most foul?:
@George-K said in Thievery, most foul?:
I find it impossible to believe that, if it were so damning, there are not other copies.
Exactly. This story doesn’t pass the giggle test.
It also completely undermines Tucker Carlson's credibility if he can't produce the documents.
Tucker Carlson and credibility is an oxymoron.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:
@Loki said in Thievery, most foul?:
@George-K said in Thievery, most foul?:
I find it impossible to believe that, if it were so damning, there are not other copies.
Exactly. This story doesn’t pass the giggle test.
It also completely undermines Tucker Carlson's credibility if he can't produce the documents.
Tucker Carlson and credibility is an oxymoron.
wrote on 29 Oct 2020, 21:35 last edited by@nobodyssock said in Thievery, most foul?:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:
@Loki said in Thievery, most foul?:
@George-K said in Thievery, most foul?:
I find it impossible to believe that, if it were so damning, there are not other copies.
Exactly. This story doesn’t pass the giggle test.
It also completely undermines Tucker Carlson's credibility if he can't produce the documents.
Tucker Carlson and credibility is an oxymoron.
Does it hurt if you try to think?
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:
@Loki said in Thievery, most foul?:
@George-K said in Thievery, most foul?:
I find it impossible to believe that, if it were so damning, there are not other copies.
Exactly. This story doesn’t pass the giggle test.
It also completely undermines Tucker Carlson's credibility if he can't produce the documents.
Tucker Carlson and credibility is an oxymoron.
wrote on 29 Oct 2020, 21:46 last edited by Copper@nobodyssock said in Thievery, most foul?:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:
@Loki said in Thievery, most foul?:
@George-K said in Thievery, most foul?:
I find it impossible to believe that, if it were so damning, there are not other copies.
Exactly. This story doesn’t pass the giggle test.
It also completely undermines Tucker Carlson's credibility if he can't produce the documents.
Tucker Carlson and credibility is an oxymoron.
I bet he's stupid too.
Wouldn't you say Tucker is stupid?
I bet he is stupid.
-
wrote on 29 Oct 2020, 21:46 last edited by
-
@nobodyssock said in Thievery, most foul?:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:
@Loki said in Thievery, most foul?:
@George-K said in Thievery, most foul?:
I find it impossible to believe that, if it were so damning, there are not other copies.
Exactly. This story doesn’t pass the giggle test.
It also completely undermines Tucker Carlson's credibility if he can't produce the documents.
Tucker Carlson and credibility is an oxymoron.
I bet he's stupid too.
Wouldn't you say Tucker is stupid?
I bet he is stupid.
wrote on 29 Oct 2020, 21:51 last edited by@Copper said in Thievery, most foul?:
@nobodyssock said in Thievery, most foul?:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:
@Loki said in Thievery, most foul?:
@George-K said in Thievery, most foul?:
I find it impossible to believe that, if it were so damning, there are not other copies.
Exactly. This story doesn’t pass the giggle test.
It also completely undermines Tucker Carlson's credibility if he can't produce the documents.
Tucker Carlson and credibility is an oxymoron.
I bet he's stupid too.
Wouldn't you say Tucker is stupid?
I bet he is stupid.
He’s intelligent enough to spread the Right’s lies and play into the fears of the stupid
-
wrote on 30 Oct 2020, 11:29 last edited by
I bet he's smart enough to have cameras in an area where millions of dollars worth of packages are handled...
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-missing-ups-biden-family-documents-hunter-biden
-
wrote on 30 Oct 2020, 12:22 last edited by
He's not smart enough to use an ftp site or dropbox to transfer files.
Honestly - they mail this stuff on USB sticks? LOLz.
-
He's not smart enough to use an ftp site or dropbox to transfer files.
Honestly - they mail this stuff on USB sticks? LOLz.
wrote on 30 Oct 2020, 13:12 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:
Honestly - they mail this stuff on USB sticks? LOLz.
Maybe they exhausted their Gigabytes that are included in their data plan for the month, so they have to resort to transferring data using USB sticks. You know those ISPs and their sneaky data caps, they tend to get you at the most critical moments.
-
wrote on 30 Oct 2020, 14:02 last edited by
OK, so he's got the documents. Let's see 'em.
-
wrote on 30 Oct 2020, 14:07 last edited by
@Mik said in Thievery, most foul?:
OK, so he's got the documents. Let's see 'em.
On his Twitter, he's still going on about them disappearing as if that's the major story.
Maybe he doesn't want to release them until after the election as he's concerned it would prejudice the election process?
-
@Mik said in Thievery, most foul?:
OK, so he's got the documents. Let's see 'em.
On his Twitter, he's still going on about them disappearing as if that's the major story.
Maybe he doesn't want to release them until after the election as he's concerned it would prejudice the election process?
wrote on 30 Oct 2020, 14:11 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:
Maybe he doesn't want to release them
Yeah, I've been wondering about that. If they're so freaking incriminating, what's he waiting for?
-
wrote on 30 Oct 2020, 14:13 last edited by
-
@Copper said in Thievery, most foul?:
@nobodyssock said in Thievery, most foul?:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:
@Loki said in Thievery, most foul?:
@George-K said in Thievery, most foul?:
I find it impossible to believe that, if it were so damning, there are not other copies.
Exactly. This story doesn’t pass the giggle test.
It also completely undermines Tucker Carlson's credibility if he can't produce the documents.
Tucker Carlson and credibility is an oxymoron.
I bet he's stupid too.
Wouldn't you say Tucker is stupid?
I bet he is stupid.
He’s intelligent enough to spread the Right’s lies and play into the fears of the stupid
wrote on 30 Oct 2020, 14:23 last edited by@nobodyssock said in Thievery, most foul?:
@Copper said in Thievery, most foul?:
@nobodyssock said in Thievery, most foul?:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Thievery, most foul?:
@Loki said in Thievery, most foul?:
@George-K said in Thievery, most foul?:
I find it impossible to believe that, if it were so damning, there are not other copies.
Exactly. This story doesn’t pass the giggle test.
It also completely undermines Tucker Carlson's credibility if he can't produce the documents.
Tucker Carlson and credibility is an oxymoron.
I bet he's stupid too.
Wouldn't you say Tucker is stupid?
I bet he is stupid.
He’s intelligent enough to spread the Right’s lies and play into the fears of the stupid
You are disgusting. A walking, talking poster boy for every negative trait of the Left rolled up into one miserable little wad.
-
wrote on 30 Oct 2020, 14:38 last edited by
Yesterday I said they mailed copies. I have since learned that what was mailed was a flash drive, which was a copy of the original flash drive, which they always had. I also learned that UPS executives "found" the flash drive shortly after Tucker told about it going missing on air, no they couldn't return the mailing envelope to him because it had been thrown away, an hourly worker just happened to find the flash drive laying on the floor, no, they didn't have any security cameras in that facility where millions of dollars worth of stuff passes through per year, and no, we can't explain how an hourly worker in a warehouse ended up putting that flash drive on the desk of one of the top corporate executives....
So it wasn't a situation of "this is what we claim, and we would show you the proof except the dog ate my homework" since they had the original the entire time. Apparently a lot of what is on the flash drive involves Hunter and not his father, stuff that involves hunter's taudry sex life, which they won't be airing since the focus is on Joe's corruption, not zhunter's perversion.
-
wrote on 30 Oct 2020, 14:42 last edited by Doctor Phibes
Hey, why don't we have a bet? If Biden wins you get to look like a complete twat by wearing a bow-tie for a week. If Trump wins, I'll drink 24 cans of Budweiser.
Even I draw the line at the bowtie.
No, Ax, they're not cool.
-
wrote on 30 Oct 2020, 14:47 last edited by
Ax wears a bowtie???
85555 85555 8555555555555!!!
-
wrote on 30 Oct 2020, 14:48 last edited by
No, I'm kidding. It's a Doctor Who reference.
-
wrote on 30 Oct 2020, 14:49 last edited by
Ah..
He wears little booties, though.