Hey, Trump bashers

[Horace]

By all means, take us through your life experiences, challenges, and activities which define you as less selfish than the average Republican.

[Copper]

Someday I hope to meet a republican who is not selfish.

Just my luck, he or she will probably be stupid.

[A Former User]

@Copper said in Hey, Trump bashers:

Someday I hope to meet a republican who is not selfish.

Just my luck, he or she will probably be stupid.

And facetious

[Doctor Phibes]

@Horace said in Hey, Trump bashers:

I don't think Boris strikes the rest of the world as a person of high class. You just can't have that hair and pretend to appeal to that.

He's upper class rather than high class, which might not make sense if you're not British. I'm not really sure what high class is. Obviously, Trump is pretty close to being the archetypal Ugly American, which apparently appeals to some people. I'm sure if he was running on the Democrat ticket half the people here would be calling him all kinds of names.

[A Former User]

@Doctor-Phibes said in Hey, Trump bashers:

@Horace said in Hey, Trump bashers:

I don't think Boris strikes the rest of the world as a person of high class. You just can't have that hair and pretend to appeal to that.

He's upper class rather than high class, which might not make sense if you're not British. I'm not really sure what high class is. Obviously, Trump is pretty close to being the archetypal Ugly American, which apparently appeals to some people. I'm sure if he was running on the Democrat ticket half the people here would be calling him all kinds of names.

Hed never make it to nomination on democrat ticket. They wouldnt put up with his amoral character. Something republicans could care less about. As long as their guy protects their money and keeps the mexicans out.

[George K]

@nobodyssock said in Hey, Trump bashers:

Hed never make it to nomination on democrat ticket.

And the woman who Biden chose dropped out before the first primary. Talk about electability, LOL.

As long as their guy protects their money

Might want to investigate who is the "Party of the Rich" these days too...

[Doctor Phibes]

@nobodyssock said in Hey, Trump bashers:

@Doctor-Phibes said in Hey, Trump bashers:

@Horace said in Hey, Trump bashers:

I don't think Boris strikes the rest of the world as a person of high class. You just can't have that hair and pretend to appeal to that.

He's upper class rather than high class, which might not make sense if you're not British. I'm not really sure what high class is. Obviously, Trump is pretty close to being the archetypal Ugly American, which apparently appeals to some people. I'm sure if he was running on the Democrat ticket half the people here would be calling him all kinds of names.

Hed never make it to nomination on democrat ticket. They wouldnt put up with his amoral character. Something republicans could care less about. As long as their guy protects their money and keeps the mexicans out.

Teddy Kennedy seemed to do OK and he was a total scumbag.

[George K]

@Doctor-Phibes said in Hey, Trump bashers:

seemed to do OK

As long as he could get a sammich....

[Doctor Phibes]

In Massachusetts they think the Kennedy's walk on water, which is actually pretty ironic.

[George K]

@Doctor-Phibes said in Hey, Trump bashers:

In Massachusetts they think the Kennedy's walk on water

Walk on water ≠ drive near water.

[A Former User]

@George-K said in Hey, Trump bashers:

@nobodyssock said in Hey, Trump bashers:

Hed never make it to nomination on democrat ticket.

And the woman who Biden chose dropped out before the first primary. Talk about electability, LOL.

As long as their guy protects their money

Might want to investigate who is the "Party of the Rich" these days

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/how-the-gop-became-the-party-of-the-rich-237247/amp/

Dont really need to investigate something that is plain as the sky is blue.

[Copper]

Well if rolling stone says so, that ends the discussion.

[George K]

@Copper said in Hey, Trump bashers:

Well if rolling stone says so, that ends the discussion.

Especially nine years ago.

[A Former User]

@Copper said in Hey, Trump bashers:

Well if rolling stone says so, that ends the discussion.

Typical retort. Dont like the message, shoot the messenger. You really do have much in common with trump. Fucking ostrich

[George K]

@nobodyssock said in Hey, Trump bashers:

@Copper said in Hey, Trump bashers:

Well if rolling stone says so, that ends the discussion.

Typical retort. Dont like the message, shoot the messenger. You really do have much in common with trump. Fucking ostrich

Nothing like making your point with name-calling.

But, seriously, try to find something more current (it's not that hard) on wealth of Red vs Blue states and see how they lean politically.

Look at the big donors that contribute to political campaigns and see where the money goes. That's not hard either.

Slogans are easy, facts are a bit more difficult.

You can start here: https://capitalresearch.org/article/party-one-percent/

Top 300 zip codes nationwide (representing the top 1.4 percent of socio-economic status):
Democrats $71 million
Republicans $47 million
(60 percent Democratic)

Big Four metropolitan areas’ zip codes in top 5 percent by socio-economic status:
Democrats $77 million
Republicans $42 million
(65 percent Democratic)

Big Four central-city zip codes in top 5 percent of socio-economic status:
Democrats $48 million
Republicans $21 million
(70 percent Democratic)

These data are powerful evidence that affluent Americans in the most elite locales contribute significantly more money to Democrats than Republicans. The data also show that Democrats raise a notable chunk of their campaign money in New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Washington, D.C. Democratic candidates and party officials attending affluent contributors’ fundraisers evidently have to spend a lot of time in airliners or private jets flying coast to coast across the country, while Republican candidates and party officials have to make significantly more fundraising stops, staggered across the giant landmass of America between the two coasts.

Half a century ago, many liberal commentators argued that Democrats, as the party whose policies allegedly represented the interests of lower-income Americans, had an unfair disadvantage in raising money for campaigns, because they couldn’t compete with Republicans for access to the checkbooks of the wealthy. The data presented here make clear that that argument, regardless of whether it was valid then, has no validity today.

[Copper]

@nobodyssock said in Hey, Trump bashers:

@Copper said in Hey, Trump bashers:

Well if rolling stone says so, that ends the discussion.

Typical retort. Dont like the message, shoot the messenger. You really do have much in common with trump. Fucking ostrich

Now I feel stupid

[Loki]

@nobodyssock said in Hey, Trump bashers:

@George-K said in Hey, Trump bashers:

@nobodyssock said in Hey, Trump bashers:

Hed never make it to nomination on democrat ticket.

And the woman who Biden chose dropped out before the first primary. Talk about electability, LOL.

As long as their guy protects their money

Might want to investigate who is the "Party of the Rich" these days

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/how-the-gop-became-the-party-of-the-rich-237247/amp/

Dont really need to investigate something that is plain as the sky is blue.

2011 article? Seriously?

[George K]

@Copper said in Hey, Trump bashers:

Now I feel stupid

I'll hold you, if that would help.

[A Former User]

@George-K said in Hey, Trump bashers:

@nobodyssock said in Hey, Trump bashers:

@Copper said in Hey, Trump bashers:

Well if rolling stone says so, that ends the discussion.

Typical retort. Dont like the message, shoot the messenger. You really do have much in common with trump. Fucking ostrich

Nothing like making your point with name-calling.

But, seriously, try to find something more current (it's not that hard) on wealth of Red vs Blue states and see how they lean politically.

Look at the big donors that contribute to political campaigns and see where the money goes. That's not hard either.

Slogans are easy, facts are a bit more difficult.

You can start here: https://capitalresearch.org/article/party-one-percent/

Top 300 zip codes nationwide (representing the top 1.4 percent of socio-economic status):
Democrats $71 million
Republicans $47 million
(60 percent Democratic)

Big Four metropolitan areas’ zip codes in top 5 percent by socio-economic status:
Democrats $77 million
Republicans $42 million
(65 percent Democratic)

Big Four central-city zip codes in top 5 percent of socio-economic status:
Democrats $48 million
Republicans $21 million
(70 percent Democratic)

These data are powerful evidence that affluent Americans in the most elite locales contribute significantly more money to Democrats than Republicans. The data also show that Democrats raise a notable chunk of their campaign money in New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Washington, D.C. Democratic candidates and party officials attending affluent contributors’ fundraisers evidently have to spend a lot of time in airliners or private jets flying coast to coast across the country, while Republican candidates and party officials have to make significantly more fundraising stops, staggered across the giant landmass of America between the two coasts.

Half a century ago, many liberal commentators argued that Democrats, as the party whose policies allegedly represented the interests of lower-income Americans, had an unfair disadvantage in raising money for campaigns, because they couldn’t compete with Republicans for access to the checkbooks of the wealthy. The data presented here make clear that that argument, regardless of whether it was valid then, has no validity today.

The hypocrisy here is mindnumbing. The resident redneck calls people names here on a daily basis here. Far worse names than ostrich. But his politics align with yours, thus the pass.

[Horace]

It's because the resident redneck is a lot smarter and more interesting than you. And you are literally incapable of proving that point wrong. But you'll flail away at it. Boy do you ever.