Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Puzzle Time - Election Edition

Puzzle Time - Election Edition

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
30 Posts 4 Posters 186 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    Klaus
    wrote on 12 Oct 2020, 16:08 last edited by Klaus 10 Dec 2020, 16:09
    #19

    Here's how to construct the 1:1 correspondence.

    Assume a path that leads to a tie, say

    KKHH...

    which yields a tie after 4 votes.

    Now take every vote until the tie and flip K with H and vice versa.
    The remainder stays the same.

    HHKK...

    That's the corresponding path starting with H.

    That correspondence works both ways because every path starting with H must eventually be tied at some point (because K has more votes).

    1 Reply Last reply
    • J jon-nyc
      12 Oct 2020, 16:07

      No, there are plenty of cases where K has the lead, loses the lead for a while, and gains it back.

      K Offline
      K Offline
      Klaus
      wrote on 12 Oct 2020, 16:11 last edited by
      #20

      @jon-nyc said in Puzzle Time - Election Edition:

      No, there are plenty of cases where K has the lead, loses the lead for a while, and gains it back.

      Exactly. Those cases shouldn't count as successful. And I don't count them, since they are among the paths where there is at least one tie in between.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • K Offline
        K Offline
        Klaus
        wrote on 12 Oct 2020, 16:20 last edited by Klaus
        #21

        Let me illustrate that my solution works with a simpler case:

        Let's say that K wins with 3 votes against 2 votes for H.

        According to my solution, the probability would be (3-2)/(3+2) = 20%.

        Let's consider all 10 possible sequences:

        HKKKH
        HKKHK
        HKHKK
        HHKKK
        KHKKH
        KHKHK
        KHHKK
        KKHKH
        KKHHK
        KKKHH

        Only two of these are successful, namely:

        KKHKH
        KKKHH

        2 out of 10; exactly the 20% my formula predicted.

        You can also see the 1:1 correspondence of the remaining 8 ones: There's an equal number of paths starting with H and unsuccessful paths starting with K, namely 4 each. Flip at the first tie and you get the corresponding other one. Here are the four pairs of the correspondence.

        HKKKH - KHKKH
        HKKHK - KHKKH
        HKHKK - KHHKK
        HHKKK - KKHHK

        1 Reply Last reply
        • J Offline
          J Offline
          jon-nyc
          wrote on 12 Oct 2020, 16:31 last edited by
          #22

          Ah, I thought you meant those that ended in a tie. Not those that tied at all. Let me look at it again after I’m done with lunch

          Only non-witches get due process.

          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
          K 1 Reply Last reply 12 Oct 2020, 16:38
          • J jon-nyc
            12 Oct 2020, 16:31

            Ah, I thought you meant those that ended in a tie. Not those that tied at all. Let me look at it again after I’m done with lunch

            K Offline
            K Offline
            Klaus
            wrote on 12 Oct 2020, 16:38 last edited by Klaus 10 Dec 2020, 18:08
            #23

            @jon-nyc yes, I meant those that start with K but tie at any point later on. Also, nothing ends in a tie since the final result is 105:95.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • K Offline
              K Offline
              Klaus
              wrote on 13 Oct 2020, 08:44 last edited by Klaus
              #24

              By the way, there's an interesting pattern in the puzzles you post. They seem to be extremely complicated and involve all kinds of advanced maths, but then it turns out there's some kind of trick that only applies in the very specific situation that suddenly makes all the complexity go away and there's a very simple solution. I assume one could also come up with all the formulas to compute the number of distinct successful paths (which would involve Catalan numbers and stuff), divide it by the total number of paths, and, after a lot of algebraic manipulation, end up with the same formula. So the actual puzzle is to find a shortcut to the formula, which, in this case, turns out to be the identification of the path correspondence.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • J Offline
                J Offline
                jon-nyc
                wrote on 13 Oct 2020, 13:37 last edited by jon-nyc
                #25

                Your solution is neat.

                Another is similar to a cycle lemma proof.

                Imagine randomly arranging the votes in a circle and trying to decide where to start in order to satisfy the goal of K always being ahead. You can remove any adjacent pairs KH as they will not lead to an increase in H votes. You are left with 10 Ks at the end of this process, corresponding to starting points that would have resulted in K always being ahead.

                10/200=5%

                Only non-witches get due process.

                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                K 1 Reply Last reply 13 Oct 2020, 14:51
                • J jon-nyc
                  13 Oct 2020, 13:37

                  Your solution is neat.

                  Another is similar to a cycle lemma proof.

                  Imagine randomly arranging the votes in a circle and trying to decide where to start in order to satisfy the goal of K always being ahead. You can remove any adjacent pairs KH as they will not lead to an increase in H votes. You are left with 10 Ks at the end of this process, corresponding to starting points that would have resulted in K always being ahead.

                  10/200=5%

                  K Offline
                  K Offline
                  Klaus
                  wrote on 13 Oct 2020, 14:51 last edited by
                  #26

                  @jon-nyc said in Puzzle Time - Election Edition:

                  Imagine randomly arranging the votes in a circle and trying to decide where to start in order to satisfy the goal of K always being ahead. You can remove any adjacent pairs KH as they will not lead to an increase in H votes. You are left with 10 Ks at the end of this process, corresponding to starting points that would have resulted in K always being ahead.

                  You lost me at "You are left with 10 Ks...". Can you elaborate?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • J Offline
                    J Offline
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote on 13 Oct 2020, 15:05 last edited by jon-nyc
                    #27

                    You would finish the process and there would be 10 ‘K’ votes remaining. Had you started counting from any of those 10 spots on the circle than you would have always had a positive number because every H vote you came across would have been preceded (not necessarily immediately) by a canceling K vote.

                    Only non-witches get due process.

                    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • J Offline
                      J Offline
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote on 13 Oct 2020, 15:06 last edited by
                      #28

                      Try it with a circle of 10 (6K,4H) and you’ll see what I mean.

                      Only non-witches get due process.

                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • J Offline
                        J Offline
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote on 13 Oct 2020, 15:07 last edited by
                        #29

                        I want to know if the reason Horace hasn’t chimed in is because he’s indignant at his loss to Klaus.

                        Only non-witches get due process.

                        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Loki
                          wrote on 13 Oct 2020, 15:14 last edited by
                          #30

                          Maybe Klaus’s answers weren’t sealed properly and therefore were thrown out.

                          Horace is likely busy setting up his transition team.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes

                          28/30

                          13 Oct 2020, 15:06


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          28 out of 30
                          • First post
                            28/30
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups