Durham indictments

[xenon]

Looks like none before the election.

https://www.axios.com/barr-durham-report-election-3c02ec6a-7613-4083-b35c-4844de6da16b.html

And looks like Trump had to find out from Limbaugh. If that’s true, what a putz Barr is for telling others before Trump (Trump talking to Limbaugh)

If that's the case I think it's terrible. It's very disappointing. And I'll tell him to his face," Trump said during the roughly two-hour radio interview.

"I think it's a disgrace. It's an embarrassment," he said.

The president said he was previously unaware of Barr's reported comments. "I'm hearing this for the first time," Trump told Limbaugh.

"If Bill Barr made that statement, I would be very disappointed in him," Trump added.

[George K]

From what I've read at the RWEC, the Durham report and investigation had expanded far, far, beyond its original charter.

(insert Ken Starr quip here:__________)

Supposedly, the reason for the delay is that there's a lot more than was expected. Of course, that's all rumor now.

A thought experiment:

After the election and Donald Trump wins loses the election, the Durham report comes out with a damning indictment (not in a legal sense) of Brennan, Comey, Obama, Clinton, et al.

Then what?

[Jolly]

Nothing.

(And how my net is still up, I don't have a clue)