The Third Quarter
-
-
And Fox fans the world over are going to think it's because they're doing such a good job.
Please love yourself.
-
And Fox fans the world over are going to think it's because they're doing such a good job.
@Aqua-Letifer said in The Third Quarter:
And Fox fans the world over are going to think it's because they're doing such a good job.
Numbers don't lie?
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
BBC world news gets 99 million a week.
I know, apples and oranges.
Similarly, Fox is one conservative channel vs. multiple non-conservative. So all the cons watch Fox, all the libs watch one of 5 or 6 channels.
Lies, damn lies, and statistics.
I was only joking
-
And has people have said in regards to music, movies, TV shows, etc., popularity does not equal quality.
-
BBC World news is way more than 20 times better than Fox.
-
@Aqua-Letifer said in The Third Quarter:
And Fox fans the world over are going to think it's because they're doing such a good job.
Numbers don't lie?
@Jolly said in The Third Quarter:
@Aqua-Letifer said in The Third Quarter:
And Fox fans the world over are going to think it's because they're doing such a good job.
Numbers don't lie?
As truthful as unedited photos!
-
BBC world news gets 99 million a week.
I know, apples and oranges.
Similarly, Fox is one conservative channel vs. multiple non-conservative. So all the cons watch Fox, all the libs watch one of 5 or 6 channels.
Lies, damn lies, and statistics.
@Doctor-Phibes said in The Third Quarter:
BBC world news gets 99 million a week.
I know, apples and oranges.
Similarly, Fox is one conservative channel vs. multiple non-conservative. So all the cons watch Fox, all the libs watch one of 5 or 6 channels.
Lies, damn lies, and statistics.
Your take is my take.
-
BBC world news gets 99 million a week.
I know, apples and oranges.
Similarly, Fox is one conservative channel vs. multiple non-conservative. So all the cons watch Fox, all the libs watch one of 5 or 6 channels.
Lies, damn lies, and statistics.
@Doctor-Phibes said in The Third Quarter:
BBC world news gets 99 million a week.
I know, apples and oranges.
Similarly, Fox is one conservative channel vs. multiple non-conservative. So all the cons watch Fox, all the libs watch one of 5 or 6 channels.
Lies, damn lies, and statistics.
In the U.S. or worldwide?
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in The Third Quarter:
BBC world news gets 99 million a week.
I know, apples and oranges.
Similarly, Fox is one conservative channel vs. multiple non-conservative. So all the cons watch Fox, all the libs watch one of 5 or 6 channels.
Lies, damn lies, and statistics.
In the U.S. or worldwide?
@Jolly said in The Third Quarter:
@Doctor-Phibes said in The Third Quarter:
BBC world news gets 99 million a week.
I know, apples and oranges.
Similarly, Fox is one conservative channel vs. multiple non-conservative. So all the cons watch Fox, all the libs watch one of 5 or 6 channels.
Lies, damn lies, and statistics.
In the U.S. or worldwide?
My point was that it's an unfair comparison. If there are 5-6 liberal channels and one conservative channel it stands to reason that the conservative channel will get more viewers, if we assume that people tend to watch the channel of their side.
The reason I brought up BBC World is that it gains far more viewers than Fox, but they're different viewers - it was a parallel example that quoting numbers without context doesn't provide an accurate basis for comparison.
