Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Saw something that made me LOL today

Saw something that made me LOL today

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
16 Posts 7 Posters 102 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

    What’s the graph of?

    George KG Offline
    George KG Offline
    George K
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    @jon-nyc said in Saw something that made me LOL today:

    What’s the graph of?

    I'm glad I'm not the only one that didn't get it...

    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins Dad
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/betting_odds/2016_president/

      The Brad

      1 Reply Last reply
      • George KG Offline
        George KG Offline
        George K
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        Screen Shot 2020-09-24 at 2.04.11 PM.png

        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

        LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
        • George KG George K

          Screen Shot 2020-09-24 at 2.04.11 PM.png

          LuFins DadL Offline
          LuFins DadL Offline
          LuFins Dad
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          @George-K said in Saw something that made me LOL today:

          Screen Shot 2020-09-24 at 2.04.11 PM.png

          That’s current, mine was 2016.

          The Brad

          George KG 1 Reply Last reply
          • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

            @George-K said in Saw something that made me LOL today:

            Screen Shot 2020-09-24 at 2.04.11 PM.png

            That’s current, mine was 2016.

            George KG Offline
            George KG Offline
            George K
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            @LuFins-Dad said in Saw something that made me LOL today:

            That’s current, mine was 2016

            I know. I just thought it an interesting contrast.

            "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

            The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

            LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
            • George KG George K

              @LuFins-Dad said in Saw something that made me LOL today:

              That’s current, mine was 2016

              I know. I just thought it an interesting contrast.

              LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins Dad
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              @George-K said in Saw something that made me LOL today:

              @LuFins-Dad said in Saw something that made me LOL today:

              That’s current, mine was 2016

              I know. I just thought it an interesting contrast.

              I know a lot of lefties that are crowing and bragging about the polls, and I am just shaking my head...

              The Brad

              1 Reply Last reply
              • MikM Away
                MikM Away
                Mik
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                That's what I was talking about earlier, hubris. I honestly think they cannot conceive that Trump could possibly win.

                “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                1 Reply Last reply
                • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                  Doctor PhibesD Offline
                  Doctor Phibes
                  wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
                  #11

                  These aren't actually polls you're linking to, they're betting odds.

                  I'm a lefty and all, and I for one still think that Trump is going to win.

                  I was only joking

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • HoraceH Offline
                    HoraceH Offline
                    Horace
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    betting odds can be assumed to be better predictors than polls.

                    Education is extremely important.

                    Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                    • HoraceH Horace

                      betting odds can be assumed to be better predictors than polls.

                      Doctor PhibesD Offline
                      Doctor PhibesD Offline
                      Doctor Phibes
                      wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
                      #13

                      @Horace said in Saw something that made me LOL today:

                      betting odds can be assumed to be better predictors than polls.

                      Based on what?

                      Last election's odds weren't exactly accurate.

                      I was only joking

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • HoraceH Offline
                        HoraceH Offline
                        Horace
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        based on money mattering to people, and words not.

                        Education is extremely important.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                          Doctor PhibesD Offline
                          Doctor Phibes
                          wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
                          #15

                          The odds are based on how people who gamble are betting, so it's a sub-section of the population not chosen at random, and including a lot of people who probably aren't eligible to vote.

                          Also, 2016's numbers were complete bollocks.

                          I was only joking

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Loki
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            Of course people are betting that 2016 will repeat. One would have to assume that there were no lessons learned from what was missed last time.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • Users
                            • Groups