What's the White House's plan, anyway?
-
You want to go back to work? Go back to work.
You don't want to go back to work? Don't go back to work.
That isn't up to the governor or the president or anyone else.
wrote on 14 Apr 2020, 16:05 last edited by@Copper said in What's the White House's plan, anyway?:
You want to go back to work? Go back to work.
You don't want to go back to work? Don't go back to work.
That isn't up to the governor or the president or anyone else.
And if I kill somebody else, that's a sacrifice I'm willing for them to make, right?
-
@Copper said in What's the White House's plan, anyway?:
You want to go back to work? Go back to work.
You don't want to go back to work? Don't go back to work.
That isn't up to the governor or the president or anyone else.
And if I kill somebody else, that's a sacrifice I'm willing for them to make, right?
wrote on 14 Apr 2020, 16:25 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in What's the White House's plan, anyway?:
@Copper said in What's the White House's plan, anyway?:
You want to go back to work? Go back to work.
You don't want to go back to work? Don't go back to work.
That isn't up to the governor or the president or anyone else.
And if I kill somebody else, that's a sacrifice I'm willing for them to make, right?
That is against the law.
-
Really? Color me surprised!
That's exactly what I said was the problem with government data collection—that any story can be ginned up to leverage it against you. Get enough data on someone and anybody can have a solid case made against them. That's what's so funny about falsifying evidence; you can do anyone in without resorting to that now.
I said that here, many times. And all anyone on the right wanted to talk about was how much of a traitor Snowden was. You couldn't possibly be more correct about "forest for the trees."
wrote on 14 Apr 2020, 16:45 last edited by@Aqua-Letifer said in What's the White House's plan, anyway?:
Really? Color me surprised!
That's exactly what I said was the problem with government data collection—that any story can be ginned up to leverage it against you. Get enough data on someone and anybody can have a solid case made against them. That's what's so funny about falsifying evidence; you can do anyone in without resorting to that now.
I said that here, many times. And all anyone on the right wanted to talk about was how much of a traitor Snowden was. You couldn't possibly be more correct about "forest for the trees."
You're equating the Snowden general stuff with the Trump *specific * stuff. One is a possibility, the other is a lead pipe cinch.
-
wrote on 14 Apr 2020, 16:59 last edited by
One already happened, the other is definitely going to, starting next month. And it's going to remain voluntary. White House hasn't even entertained compulsory use yet.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in What's the White House's plan, anyway?:
@Copper said in What's the White House's plan, anyway?:
You want to go back to work? Go back to work.
You don't want to go back to work? Don't go back to work.
That isn't up to the governor or the president or anyone else.
And if I kill somebody else, that's a sacrifice I'm willing for them to make, right?
That is against the law.
wrote on 14 Apr 2020, 17:00 last edited by@Copper said in What's the White House's plan, anyway?:
@Doctor-Phibes said in What's the White House's plan, anyway?:
@Copper said in What's the White House's plan, anyway?:
You want to go back to work? Go back to work.
You don't want to go back to work? Don't go back to work.
That isn't up to the governor or the president or anyone else.
And if I kill somebody else, that's a sacrifice I'm willing for them to make, right?
That is against the law.
Last time I checked, accidentally giving somebody a virus which went on to kill them wasn't considered to be a crime.
Obviously, we can keep on making sarcastic remarks all day, but it's not really going to achieve very much. In the real world most of us inhabit it's clearly going to be somebody's decision when we should be allowed to go back to work. It is up to other people to decide, whether that's the governor, or the President, or my senior management, or whoever.
-
wrote on 14 Apr 2020, 17:05 last edited by
Yes, of course if you intend to kill someone accidentally that is fine, please go ahead.
And my comment above advising AL to follow his heart was meant after our elected officials give the go-ahead.
I believe he was saying he did not want to be forced to go back to work. The president won't force him to go.
-
wrote on 14 Apr 2020, 19:32 last edited by
-
wrote on 14 Apr 2020, 19:54 last edited by
@xenon said in What's the White House's plan, anyway?:
I don't understand what this means:
Anyone?
As in, I don't know what he means by this at all.
I do.
Carrot and stick.
-
@xenon said in What's the White House's plan, anyway?:
I don't understand what this means:
Anyone?
As in, I don't know what he means by this at all.
I do.
Carrot and stick.
wrote on 14 Apr 2020, 20:02 last edited by@Jolly said in What's the White House's plan, anyway?:
I do.
Carrot and stick.
https://myrecipeconfessions.com/side-dishes/grilled-maple-carrot-kabobs/ -
wrote on 14 Apr 2020, 22:58 last edited by
He's saying the plan is almost complete and will be rolled out very soon, all of which means very little.
-
He's saying the plan is almost complete and will be rolled out very soon, all of which means very little.
wrote on 14 Apr 2020, 23:18 last edited by@Mik said in What's the White House's plan, anyway?:
He's saying the plan is almost complete and will be rolled out very soon, all of which means very little.
True, but he did also do a run-through on the carrot and stick...
-
He's saying the plan is almost complete and will be rolled out very soon, all of which means very little.
wrote on 15 Apr 2020, 00:38 last edited by@Mik said in What's the White House's plan, anyway?:
He's saying the plan is almost complete and will be rolled out very soon
I've said that a couple of time right before I opened up Microsoft Project and started going OH SHIT OH SHIT OH SHIT....
I just hope he's got people working on it than me