Accepting the results of the election
-
@taiwan_girl said in Accepting the results of the election:
As I said in @Jolly forum thread from a couple of days ago.
It is goofy for either side to claim this of the other side.
Thought exercises like the ones in the article are fun, but in this case, I do not think they have reality in focus.
Jesus.
@Larry said in Accepting the results of the election:
@taiwan_girl said in Accepting the results of the election:
As I said in @Jolly forum thread from a couple of days ago.
It is goofy for either side to claim this of the other side.
Thought exercises like the ones in the article are fun, but in this case, I do not think they have reality in focus.
Jesus.
Some people call me a goddess, but never Jesus!!
:woman-heart-man:
Just teasing you.
-
@taiwan_girl Former Secretary of State Clinton has already stated that Nominee Biden should not concede at all, no matter the numbers.
-
@taiwan_girl Former Secretary of State Clinton has already stated that Nominee Biden should not concede at all, no matter the numbers.
@LuFins-Dad said in Accepting the results of the election:
@taiwan_girl Former Secretary of State Clinton has already stated that Nominee Biden should not concede at all, no matter the numbers.
And President Trump responded when asked if he would accept the results of the 2020 election, responsed, "I have to see"
Again, I do not see any chance of EITHER side not accepting the results or trying to "rig" the results for their side.
-
@Larry If you accept that one side can do it, then it seems denial to say that the other side is so pure that they would not do it.
I simply believe that BOTH sides are pure (enough) so that it will not happen.
-
@Larry If you accept that one side can do it, then it seems denial to say that the other side is so pure that they would not do it.
I simply believe that BOTH sides are pure (enough) so that it will not happen.
@taiwan_girl said in Accepting the results of the election:
@Larry If you accept that one side can do it, then it seems denial to say that the other side is so pure that they would not do it.
I simply believe that BOTH sides are pure (enough) so that it will not happen.
There is very little doubt that JFK stole the election of 1960. If Bush would have folded, the Dems would have found enough votes in Broward County to win the election for Gore.
I come from a state where a former governor and U.S. congressman said he could fix a voting machine to make it play a tune.
Never, ever say an election can't be fixed. Shucks, I rigged a couple of voting machines back in college to produce a desired result and I was a rank amateur college kid.
-
TG, I know. You believe every issue you address is the same for both sides. And no amount of facts to the contrary moves you off that flawed bit of thinking.
It is a known FACT that Hillary was engaged in trying to steal the election. That is a solid, irrefutable fact. Hillary asking Trump if he would accept the results was her setting him up for when she stole the election, and Trump knew it. Hell, everyone knew it. Now we see signs they are planning to steal this election too. So no ma'am, its not "the same on both sides".
-
Two guys anyway.
Yes I remember you not mentioning it when we were discussing the âlegitimate concernâ about Trump doing something similar. I presume you were giggling at my ignorance while avoiding saying something bad about your TDS tribe. A jon-nyc twofer.
-
Funny to watch you acknowledge that itâs obscure trivia that TG wonât have heard about while simultaneously pretending it was some grand conspiracy of âthe leftâ.
@jon-nyc said in Accepting the results of the election:
Funny to watch you acknowledge that itâs obscure trivia that TG wonât have heard about while simultaneously pretending it was some grand conspiracy of âthe leftâ.
No jon, I didn't say it was a grand conspiracy. This is where you'd whine like a little bitch about me straw manning you though.