Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The Iran War (was Nuclear Program) thread

The Iran War (was Nuclear Program) thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
870 Posts 20 Posters 95.9k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

    Seems like presidents should probably know things like this before they launch the war.

    IMG_1078.jpeg

    RenaudaR Offline
    RenaudaR Offline
    Renauda
    wrote last edited by
    #860

    @jon-nyc

    You can be assured that fact would have been included in Trumpty Dumpty’s briefing provided Putin’s WH asset, Tulsi Gabbard, did not have it removed prior.

    Now whether Trumpty listened or understood is entirely another matter.

    Elbows up!

    1 Reply Last reply
    • RenaudaR Offline
      RenaudaR Offline
      Renauda
      wrote last edited by Renauda
      #861

      Trump is now trying to extricate himself from this impending debacle through his preferred tool of persuasion, that is to say, extortion. G W Bush at least brought a fig leaf of legitimacy to his war on Iraq through the UNSC and building the so called “Coalition of the Willing” or as Shantinik described it at the time, The Coalition of the Small and Obscure. This moron in the WH instead is relying on extortionist rhetoric to cobble together a “coalition of the coerced” now that he realises he has embarked on a bloody folly and finds himself way in over his empty head.

      https://archive.is/l19aG

      The money quote:

      “We have a thing called Nato,” said Trump, who has often criticised the alliance. “We’ve been very sweet. We didn’t have to help them with Ukraine. Ukraine is thousands of miles away from us . . . But we helped them. Now we’ll see if they help us. Because I’ve long said that we’ll be there for them but they won’t be there for us. And I’m not sure that they’d be there.”

      Let’s just all go bang our heads against the wall.

      Elbows up!

      1 Reply Last reply
      • MikM Away
        MikM Away
        Mik
        wrote last edited by
        #862

        Why would NATO want to get involved with Iran? Ukraine is right on their border. The two situations have no parallels.

        "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

        1 Reply Last reply
        • RenaudaR Offline
          RenaudaR Offline
          Renauda
          wrote last edited by
          #863

          If individual Nato members see it in their interests to assist the UAE, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Jordan against Iranian missiles, drones and its proxies, that will be entirely at their determination and not under US/Israeli command or directive.

          Elbows up!

          1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote last edited by
            #864

            Straight of Hormuz??? More like Gay of Hormuz.

            The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • MikM Away
              MikM Away
              Mik
              wrote last edited by
              #865

              The Ayatollah sucks.

              This is all quite delicious. I hope it’s true.

              "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

              1 Reply Last reply
              • RenaudaR Offline
                RenaudaR Offline
                Renauda
                wrote last edited by Renauda
                #866

                Putting Trump’s transactional foreign policy actually, extortionist foreign policy, into perspective:

                "Take unilateral actions without including allies, then bully them into supporting that action," — this is how Trump's approach was described by Daniel Hamilton, a foreign policy expert at the Brookings Institution.

                Adding to the irony, Trump has dismissed the one partner who rushed to offer assistance with shoring up drone defenses against Iranian attacks — Ukraine.

                ….”The last person we need help from is Zelensky," he said separately, instead accusing the Ukrainian leader of stalling peace talks with Russia, adding that Russian President Vladimir Putin is "willing to make a deal."

                Moscow, which has repeatedly rejected a ceasefire in Ukraine and continues to push its territorial demands, promptly supported Trump's criticism of Zelensky.

                https://kyivindependent.com/trump-demands-aid-from-partners-snubs-the-one-offering-it/

                Elbows up!

                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ Offline
                  jon-nycJ Offline
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote last edited by
                  #867

                  A rather optimistic take on the war from an unexpected source. (Use the ‘reader’ view to get rid of the annoying page artifacts)

                  https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2026/3/16/the-us-israeli-strategy-against-iran-is-working-here-is-why

                  The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

                  AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                    A rather optimistic take on the war from an unexpected source. (Use the ‘reader’ view to get rid of the annoying page artifacts)

                    https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2026/3/16/the-us-israeli-strategy-against-iran-is-working-here-is-why

                    AxtremusA Away
                    AxtremusA Away
                    Axtremus
                    wrote last edited by
                    #868

                    @jon-nyc said:

                    A rather optimistic take on the war from an unexpected source. ...

                    Why is the source "unexpected"?
                    I thought it quite obvious that much of the Middle-East's ruling classes and intelligencia want Iran (at least the Ayatollah's regime) to lose.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • bachophileB Offline
                      bachophileB Offline
                      bachophile
                      wrote last edited by
                      #869

                      c85dc34e-c698-4653-99db-af46acbd1c25-image.jpeg

                      Wasn’t sure whether to put this here or the Iran meme section or the funny pics. All fitting.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • bachophileB Offline
                        bachophileB Offline
                        bachophile
                        wrote last edited by
                        #870

                        Oh and by the way I think we killed Larijani and the commander of the basij

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        👍

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups