Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. SCOTUS blocks Trump tariffs under IEEPA

SCOTUS blocks Trump tariffs under IEEPA

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
27 Posts 10 Posters 245 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • X Offline
    X Offline
    xenon
    wrote last edited by
    #16

    That tariff has a built in 150 day limit.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • MikM Offline
      MikM Offline
      Mik
      wrote last edited by Mik
      #17

      https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/what-supreme-court-ruling-against-trump-tariffs-means-for-your-money/ar-AA1WKHtY

      Includes the tariffs on French wine. Happy day. 😁

      "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

      1 Reply Last reply
      • LuFins DadL Offline
        LuFins DadL Offline
        LuFins Dad
        wrote last edited by
        #18

        Anybody need a German piano?

        The Brad

        1 Reply Last reply
        • MikM Offline
          MikM Offline
          Mik
          wrote last edited by
          #19

          Gorsuch's comment on this (confirmed by Newsweek):

          alt text

          "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

          1 Reply Last reply
          • HoraceH Online
            HoraceH Online
            Horace
            wrote last edited by
            #20

            No need for journalist confirmation. That was in the written opinion released by SCOTUS.

            Education is extremely important.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • MikM Offline
              MikM Offline
              Mik
              wrote last edited by
              #21

              I confirm anything I see on FB before I share it.

              "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

              1 Reply Last reply
              • X Offline
                X Offline
                xenon
                wrote last edited by
                #22

                Trump had another tantrum and upped the 10% to 15%.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • HoraceH Online
                  HoraceH Online
                  Horace
                  wrote last edited by
                  #23

                  sigh.

                  Education is extremely important.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ Online
                    jon-nycJ Online
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote last edited by
                    #24

                    He loves taxing Americans. Makes Mamdani look like Milton Friedman in comparison.

                    The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • HoraceH Online
                      HoraceH Online
                      Horace
                      wrote last edited by
                      #25

                      From what I understand, there has to be an investigation and written justification (at least) for tariffs under the new sections. Of course the administration will concoct something, but if it's too transparently garbage, it'll be open to court rejection, presumably.

                      Education is extremely important.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • AxtremusA Away
                        AxtremusA Away
                        Axtremus
                        wrote last edited by
                        #26

                        With so many AI chat bots around, surely one can "write" a justification to muddle through the 150 days legal maximum.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • jon-nycJ Online
                          jon-nycJ Online
                          jon-nyc
                          wrote last edited by
                          #27

                          Then he lets them lapse for a day and does another 150 days of 14.9%?

                          The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups