Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Best analysis of the big bill I have seen.

Best analysis of the big bill I have seen.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
4 Posts 3 Posters 61 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MikM Offline
    MikM Offline
    Mik
    wrote on last edited by Mik
    #1

    Lots of good information, both sides represented. Long piece.

    https://govfacts.org/debate/debate-pros-and-cons-for-trumps-big-beautiful-bill/

    "The intelligent man who is proud of his intelligence is like the condemned man who is proud of his large cell." Simone Weil

    1 Reply Last reply
    • taiwan_girlT Offline
      taiwan_girlT Offline
      taiwan_girl
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Finally got around to reading this. It was a good read.

      Not a surprise about the below and am not sure how and when it will change.

      The shift reflects deeper problems in American governance. Rising partisanship makes bipartisan cooperation on individual bills increasingly difficult. Members face stronger pressure from party leadership and interest groups to maintain unified positions rather than seek compromise.

      Electoral incentives compound these problems. Representatives from safe districts face more pressure from primary challengers who punish any appearance of cooperation with the opposing party. This dynamic rewards ideological purity over pragmatic problem-solving.

      Media coverage also reinforces polarization by focusing on conflict rather than legislative substance. Complex policy debates get reduced to simple narratives about political winners and losers that make compromise appear weak rather than necessary.

      Kind of ties in to your forum thread about Joe Manchin book.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Online
        jon-nycJ Online
        jon-nyc
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Open Primaries Now.

        Thank you for your attention to this matter.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • taiwan_girlT Offline
          taiwan_girlT Offline
          taiwan_girl
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          Or rank choice.

          1 Reply Last reply
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • Users
          • Groups