Charlie Kirk Shot
-
I thought Kirk was the guy who made noise for a few days until he got a call from the White House and then said publicly that he wouldn’t be talking about it anymore.
Anyway I kind of hope they never find the guy. That way everyone can keep their pet theory alive, whether that’s South Park, the Joos, false flag, or a q-anon guy pissed at his flipflop on the files.
-
Guys, I hate to bring this up again, but this reeks of coordinated administration planned event whose main goal is to take America’s eye off the Epstein ball. This is Butler again. A sham and only speaks to how treacherous these people that run our country today are. The quick apprehension of the suspect in release by Patel aimed at taking the hunt off the real shooter this is all too much to ignore. I will end it with this in that Charlie was one of the biggest proponents for the release of the Epstein files and was an easy sacrificial lamb for Trump
@NobodySock said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
Guys, I hate to bring this up again, but this reeks of coordinated administration planned event whose main goal is to take America’s eye off the Epstein ball. This is Butler again. A sham and only speaks to how treacherous these people that run our country today are. The quick apprehension of the suspect in release by Patel aimed at taking the hunt off the real shooter this is all too much to ignore. I will end it with this in that Charlie was one of the biggest proponents for the release of the Epstein files and was an easy sacrificial lamb for Trump
Words fail.
"The intelligent man who is proud of his intelligence is like the condemned man who is proud of his large cell." Simone Weil
-
-
@NobodySock said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
Guys, I hate to bring this up again, but this reeks of coordinated administration planned event whose main goal is to take America’s eye off the Epstein ball. This is Butler again. A sham and only speaks to how treacherous these people that run our country today are. The quick apprehension of the suspect in release by Patel aimed at taking the hunt off the real shooter this is all too much to ignore. I will end it with this in that Charlie was one of the biggest proponents for the release of the Epstein files and was an easy sacrificial lamb for Trump
Words fail.
@Mik said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
@NobodySock said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
Guys, I hate to bring this up again, but this reeks of coordinated administration planned event whose main goal is to take America’s eye off the Epstein ball. This is Butler again. A sham and only speaks to how treacherous these people that run our country today are. The quick apprehension of the suspect in release by Patel aimed at taking the hunt off the real shooter this is all too much to ignore. I will end it with this in that Charlie was one of the biggest proponents for the release of the Epstein files and was an easy sacrificial lamb for Trump
WordsOlanzapine fail.FIFYNNTTM
-
22 year old
-
And a local business has pretty much committed suicide.
https://www.wlwt.com/article/cincinnati-lucius-q-restaurant-charlie-kirk-comments/66058349
"The intelligent man who is proud of his intelligence is like the condemned man who is proud of his large cell." Simone Weil
-
@jon-nyc said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
I wish it were faceless randos on the right with these reactions.
How do they not see the irony of it?
Did you watch the show? He talks about fighting them in the courts, fighting them in the media, and fighting them in the court of public opinion. To openly stand up for your various positions.
Nowhere in there is he talking about going to their homes, harassing people at restaurants, rioting, etc….
The Brad
-
And a local business has pretty much committed suicide.
https://www.wlwt.com/article/cincinnati-lucius-q-restaurant-charlie-kirk-comments/66058349
@Mik said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
And a local business has pretty much committed suicide.
https://www.wlwt.com/article/cincinnati-lucius-q-restaurant-charlie-kirk-comments/66058349
Yeah, I saw that.
-
@jon-nyc said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
I wish it were faceless randos on the right with these reactions.
How do they not see the irony of it?
Did you watch the show? He talks about fighting them in the courts, fighting them in the media, and fighting them in the court of public opinion. To openly stand up for your various positions.
Nowhere in there is he talking about going to their homes, harassing people at restaurants, rioting, etc….
It’s the collective demonization. I know everyone does it but it seems like it isn’t the time. Because you’re literally engaging in what you’re accusing the other side of having done. Hence the irony point.
If you don't take it, it can only good happen.
-
It's never the time. What gets me is the number of people on both sides who simply parrot the party line without having examined it critically, without any true conviction backing up their position. I have a family member who does it a lot and I have Kirked them on several subjects. They inevitably get flustered and try to move the goalposts or explain away why what they said didn't really mean what they said.
-
It's never the time. What gets me is the number of people on both sides who simply parrot the party line without having examined it critically, without any true conviction backing up their position. I have a family member who does it a lot and I have Kirked them on several subjects. They inevitably get flustered and try to move the goalposts or explain away why what they said didn't really mean what they said.
@Mik agree
-
@Mik said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
I don’t really have an issue with her statement. I mean, I disagree with her, but she’s not coming through as celebrating.
-
It’s the collective demonization. I know everyone does it but it seems like it isn’t the time. Because you’re literally engaging in what you’re accusing the other side of having done. Hence the irony point.
@jon-nyc said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
It’s the collective demonization. I know everyone does it but it seems like it isn’t the time. Because you’re literally engaging in what you’re accusing the other side of having done. Hence the irony point.
I get that, but in this case, it does need to be addressed that as a whole, the Democrat party has been very permissive of the escalating violence from their fringes. The lack of any sort of repercussions for Antifa, BLM, the countless riots, etc over the last 15 years opens the door to this kind of shit. These kids have been taught that there are no repercussions for their behavior in the political realm, and in some cases they will even be celebrated. And this is creeping up into more of the party mainstream.
“Mostly peaceful”, no convictions or jail time for dudes that literally took over a major part of an American city, this whole thing of turning fuckheads life George Ferguson and that Mangione kid into pop culture heroes… This is what you get.
Yeah, the other side has their own problems, but on balance…
-
I was about to say the same thing. She’s criticizing selective outrage.
Still in poor taste but grave dancing it isn’t.
And not worth trying to get her fired over.
@jon-nyc said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
I was about to say the same thing. She’s criticizing selective outrage.
Still in poor taste but grave dancing it isn’t.
And not worth trying to get her fired over.
That’s something that I’ve not been pleased with the last few days. All of these accounts that make their money by stoking outrage going after each and every person that’s made a dumbass post. There’s a fine line between reasonable consequences and a whole new era of cancel culture.
