Mildly interesting

[Mik]

Hard to understand.

[jon-nyc]

Everyone intuits that they’re more dangerous but wow.

I bet bikes are even worse though.

[jon-nyc]

Bikes aren’t worse - about 79 per billion.

Fortunately I ride trails almost exclusively.

[Mik]

Bikes are 10 times more dangerous than cars? Surprising.

[jon-nyc]

Not to me it isn’t. You’re just so vulnerable. The slightest contact can be fatal, especially if you fall toward the road

[Mik]

That's why I don't ride on roads anymore. But then I have a bike trail at my side yard, and a 90 mile one two miles away.

[jon-nyc]

Yeah I can take my trail up 50m without riding on a road. And can go 400mi to Buffalo and have 85-90% be trail.

[jon-nyc]

The 50mi from the Bronx to Brewster used to be the Putnam Railroad, in service from 1881-1958. I get it at Ardsley, less than a mile from my house. I can take it up 40mi to Brewster or down about 12.5 to Van Courtland Park in the Bronx without leaving paved trail.

Further south I’m maybe a mile or three on roads until I get to the trail along the west side highway that takes me to lower manhattan.

Up north there’s a few miles of road at Brewster until I’m on trail again for another 50 miles to New Palz.

Plenty, in other words.

[Doctor Phibes]

@Mik said in Mildly interesting:

Bikes are 10 times more dangerous than cars? Surprising.

I think that stat is a bit misleading, since bikes are a lot slower than cars. Arguably a better statistic is deaths per time spent traveling.

[LuFins Dad]

I think 40% of those deaths are cardiac associated from Lycra cutting off blood flow.