Somebody shut this idiot up
-
If you elect somebody who resembles a character out of a Batman movie, you've got to accept that some people aren't going to like him very much.
@Doctor-Phibes said in Somebody shut this idiot up:
If you elect somebody who resembles a character out of a Batman movie, you've got to accept that some people aren't going to like him very much.
And yet the other side still hasn’t been able to put fort a better candidate. Astounding.
The Brad
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Somebody shut this idiot up:
If you elect somebody who resembles a character out of a Batman movie, you've got to accept that some people aren't going to like him very much.
And yet the other side still hasn’t been able to put fort a better candidate. Astounding.
@LuFins-Dad said in Somebody shut this idiot up:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Somebody shut this idiot up:
If you elect somebody who resembles a character out of a Batman movie, you've got to accept that some people aren't going to like him very much.
And yet the other side still hasn’t been able to put fort a better candidate. Astounding.
Hey, don't blame me, you guys wanted independence.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Somebody shut this idiot up:
If you elect somebody who resembles a character out of a Batman movie, you've got to accept that some people aren't going to like him very much.
And yet the other side still hasn’t been able to put fort a better candidate. Astounding.
@LuFins-Dad said in Somebody shut this idiot up:
And yet the other side still hasn’t been able to put fort a better candidate. Astounding.
What are you talking about? Hillary Rodham Clinton was a better candidate.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Somebody shut this idiot up:
And yet the other side still hasn’t been able to put fort a better candidate. Astounding.
What are you talking about? Hillary Rodham Clinton was a better candidate.
@Axtremus said in Somebody shut this idiot up:
@LuFins-Dad said in Somebody shut this idiot up:
And yet the other side still hasn’t been able to put fort a better candidate. Astounding.
What are you talking about? Hillary Rodham Clinton was a better candidate.
If that's true then you need better humans who would have voted for that better candidate. Your issue isn't with Trump, it's with all the other humans.
-
You miss my point entirely. I was addressing calling the man an idiot, which he clearly is not. Any individual act can be assessed on its own merits.
@Mik said in Somebody shut this idiot up:
You miss my point entirely. I was addressing calling the man an idiot, which he clearly is not. Any individual act can be assessed on its own merits.
Well that’s a philosophical question. How many individual acts of idiocy does a person have to commit before they’re can be labeled an idiot wholesale?
-
@Mik said in Somebody shut this idiot up:
You miss my point entirely. I was addressing calling the man an idiot, which he clearly is not. Any individual act can be assessed on its own merits.
Well that’s a philosophical question. How many individual acts of idiocy does a person have to commit before they’re can be labeled an idiot wholesale?
@xenon said in Somebody shut this idiot up:
@Mik said in Somebody shut this idiot up:
You miss my point entirely. I was addressing calling the man an idiot, which he clearly is not. Any individual act can be assessed on its own merits.
Well that’s a philosophical question. How many individual acts of idiocy does a person have to commit before they’re can be labeled an idiot wholesale?
Now you’re being idiotic.
-
@Mik said in Somebody shut this idiot up:
You miss my point entirely. I was addressing calling the man an idiot, which he clearly is not. Any individual act can be assessed on its own merits.
Well that’s a philosophical question. How many individual acts of idiocy does a person have to commit before they’re can be labeled an idiot wholesale?
@xenon said in Somebody shut this idiot up:
@Mik said in Somebody shut this idiot up:
You miss my point entirely. I was addressing calling the man an idiot, which he clearly is not. Any individual act can be assessed on its own merits.
Well that’s a philosophical question. How many individual acts of idiocy does a person have to commit before they’re can be labeled an idiot wholesale?
I may have seen or heard Mr. Trump act like an idiot, but I can't remember it. I would be very surprised, he is not an idiot.
I think this is a word use problem. Jerk, might work if you feel that way or impolite but not idiot.
He just isn't an idiot. Check your word use.
-
@xenon said in Somebody shut this idiot up:
@Mik said in Somebody shut this idiot up:
You miss my point entirely. I was addressing calling the man an idiot, which he clearly is not. Any individual act can be assessed on its own merits.
Well that’s a philosophical question. How many individual acts of idiocy does a person have to commit before they’re can be labeled an idiot wholesale?
Now you’re being idiotic.
@Mik Presidents are elected based on showmanship, charisma, storytelling ability, among others. He’s got talents there.
Governing is based on other traits.
Yes he needed certain talents to get elected - but he can prove himself an idiot on dimensions on display when you’re in the job.
-
@xenon said in Somebody shut this idiot up:
@Mik said in Somebody shut this idiot up:
You miss my point entirely. I was addressing calling the man an idiot, which he clearly is not. Any individual act can be assessed on its own merits.
Well that’s a philosophical question. How many individual acts of idiocy does a person have to commit before they’re can be labeled an idiot wholesale?
I may have seen or heard Mr. Trump act like an idiot, but I can't remember it. I would be very surprised, he is not an idiot.
I think this is a word use problem. Jerk, might work if you feel that way or impolite but not idiot.
He just isn't an idiot. Check your word use.
-
@Copper if you tweet about your corona virus tv ratings, not only are you an idiot, but that fits my definition of a fucking tone deaf moron.
But hey - it’s subjective.
@xenon said in Somebody shut this idiot up:
@Copper if you tweet about your corona virus tv ratings, not only are you an idiot, but that fits my definition of a fucking tone deaf moron.
But hey - it’s subjective.
OK, yes this is a word use problem.
That post actually introduces several other problems with the words used.
Subjective really isn't the right word either.
-
You are objectively wrong, Xenon. It is only your desire to use that term because of your biases.
-
How about douchebag? Can we at least agree on that?
