According to Michael O'Keefe...
-
@Wim said in According to Michael O'Keefe...:
@Jolly "None of us are safe"...
Didn't know that O'Keefe was Irish.I think it's a different Michael O'Keefe.
This guy has an account on X, where he just goes on about immigrants the whole time.
-
According to 89th, he may have a point.
-
@Jolly said in According to Michael O'Keefe...:
According to 89th, he may have a point.
He might, but if his entire Twitter feed is dedicated to going on about immigrants, he might just have an agenda.
Immigration is a problem, but it's not the only problem. Ireland has done extremely well out of the EU in other ways.
My point was that this wasn't a comment by anybody you've heard of, it's just some very opinionated guy on Twitter.
-
In my undergrad years I often went beer drinking on Friday evening with a motley group that included a half dozen or so Irish engineering and chemistry grad students. Most were from Eire but there were a couple very pro Sein Fein blokes from Ulster. The main bond between us all was to drink beer then start singing the usual Irish, Scots and Atlantic Canada pub songs. The infamous Bobby Sands hunger strike happened around that time and it became something of a topic. I recall the Eire fellows telling the IRA sympathizers (Ulster and Canadian) not to romanticize life too much in independent Eire as it was a rather dismal “priest ridden” place where, outside the larger cities, a fellow was forced to buy condoms on the black market. To a person they were hoping to someday work in the UK or immigrate to Canada.
Am not at all sure what this O’Keefe fellow is rhapsodizing about when he refers to old Ireland.
-
In my undergrad years I often went beer drinking on Friday evening with a motley group that included a half dozen or so Irish engineering and chemistry grad students. Most were from Eire but there were a couple very pro Sein Fein blokes from Ulster. The main bond between us all was to drink beer then start singing the usual Irish, Scots and Atlantic Canada pub songs. The infamous Bobby Sands hunger strike happened around that time and it became something of a topic. I recall the Eire fellows telling the IRA sympathizers (Ulster and Canadian) not to romanticize life too much in independent Eire as it was a rather dismal “priest ridden” place where, outside the larger cities, a fellow was forced to buy condoms on the black market. To a person they were hoping to someday work in the UK or immigrate to Canada.
Am not at all sure what this O’Keefe fellow is rhapsodizing about when he refers to old Ireland.
@Renauda said in According to Michael O'Keefe...:
In my undergrad years I often went beer drinking on Friday evening with a motley group that included a half dozen or so Irish engineering and chemistry grad students. Most were from Eire but there were a couple very pro Sein Fein blokes from Ulster. The main bond between us all was to drink beer then start singing the usual Irish, Scots and Atlantic Canada pub songs. The infamous Bobby Sands hunger strike happened around that time and it became something of a topic. I recall the Eire fellows telling the IRA sympathizers (Ulster and Canadian) not to romanticize life too much in independent Eire as it was a rather dismal “priest ridden” place where, outside the larger cities, a fellow was forced to buy condoms on the black market. To a person they were hoping to someday work in the UK or immigrate to Canada.
Am not at all sure what this O’Keefe fellow is rhapsodizing about when he refers to old Ireland.
My sister in law is from Dublin. She left in the late 80’s or early, as did a lot of her friends and family, to live in England. It was very common. It doesn’t make sense to go on about this idyllic place of the past when so many have left for a better life elsewhere.
-
What century are we talking about again?
-
@Jolly said in According to Michael O'Keefe...:
What century are we talking about again?
Yeah, it was completely different in 2005 from how it was in the early 90's.
Obviously, your observations based on some rando on Twitter are going to much more on the mark than my family who've actually lived there.
And admit it, you thought the guy you were quoting was the actor, right?
-
No. TBH, I don't have a clue who Michael O'Keefe is.
But I agree with what the guy wrote.
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
@Jolly said in According to Michael O'Keefe...:
No. TBH, I don't have a clue who Michael O'Keefe is.
But I agree with what the guy wrote.
But of course you would. He wrote it specifically with you in mind.
You must feel important, Beauregard “Listen Boy” Foghorn.
-
Just to add a little perspective - despite recent increases, roughly 1% of Ireland is Muslim, which is roughly the same percentage as the number of native-born Irish living in England, and somewhat less than the number of Brits living in Ireland.
-
@Jolly said in According to Michael O'Keefe...:
No. TBH, I don't have a clue who Michael O'Keefe is.
But I agree with what the guy wrote.
It's also worth noting that historically and for good or ill, the British have done more to change the traditional Irish way of life than any Muslim.
-
Good thing he didn't specify only Muslims, isn't it?
-
@Jolly said in According to Michael O'Keefe...:
Good thing he didn't specify only Muslims, isn't it?
OK, he didn't actually come out and say 'non-whites', although clearly the implication was there. I'm not sure that actually makes it any better.
Interestingly enough, somebody is claiming he's not actually Irish, but a Brit. Which if true would be very, very funny.
-
Yes, O'Keefe is a common British name...
-
@Jolly said in According to Michael O'Keefe...:
Yes, O'Keefe is a common British name...
More common than Badenoch or Sunak, the last two leaders of that most English of institutions, The Conservate Party.
-
Are you now going to posit that a massive influx of foreigners has been good for England? Both economically and socially?
-
Are you now going to posit that a massive influx of foreigners has been good for England? Both economically and socially?
@Jolly said in According to Michael O'Keefe...:
Are you now going to posit that a massive influx of foreigners has been good for England? Both economically and socially?
No, there's currently clearly a problem with immigration. However, it's also not all bad by any means. Britain today is a much more vibrant, colourful and interesting place than it was in the 1950's.
The idea that a completely homogeneous population is better, as this guy seems to be implying, is simply not true. As with most things, moderation is a good idea.
I was only joking
-
@Jolly said in According to Michael O'Keefe...:
Are you now going to posit that a massive influx of foreigners has been good for England? Both economically and socially?
No, there's currently clearly a problem with immigration. However, it's also not all bad by any means. Britain today is a much more vibrant, colourful and interesting place than it was in the 1950's.
The idea that a completely homogeneous population is better, as this guy seems to be implying, is simply not true. As with most things, moderation is a good idea.
@Doctor-Phibes said in According to Michael O'Keefe...:
@Jolly said in According to Michael O'Keefe...:
Are you now going to posit that a massive influx of foreigners has been good for England? Both economically and socially?
No, there's currently clearly a problem with immigration. However, it's also not all bad by any means. Britain today is a much more vibrant, colourful and interesting place than it was in the 1950's.
The idea that a completely homogeneous population is better, as this guy seems to be implying, is simply not true. As with most things, moderation is a good idea.
A homogeneous population is not the take-away. He's bemoaning the loss of what makes Ireland culture unique. That's what happens when the influx of immigrants is too large and too fast to assimilate.
-
@Jolly said in According to Michael O'Keefe...:
Are you now going to posit that a massive influx of foreigners has been good for England? Both economically and socially?
No, there's currently clearly a problem with immigration. However, it's also not all bad by any means. Britain today is a much more vibrant, colourful and interesting place than it was in the 1950's.
The idea that a completely homogeneous population is better, as this guy seems to be implying, is simply not true. As with most things, moderation is a good idea.
@Doctor-Phibes said in According to Michael O'Keefe...:
@Jolly said in According to Michael O'Keefe...:
Are you now going to posit that a massive influx of foreigners has been good for England? Both economically and socially?
No, there's currently clearly a problem with immigration. However, it's also not all bad by any means. Britain today is a much more vibrant, colourful and interesting place than it was in the 1950's.
The idea that a completely homogeneous population is better, as this guy seems to be implying, is simply not true. As with most things, moderation is a good idea.
You had the curries already in 1990.
England got better after that with EU immigration and much, much worse with middle eastern and south Asian migration. By which I mean Islamic immigration.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in According to Michael O'Keefe...:
@Jolly said in According to Michael O'Keefe...:
Are you now going to posit that a massive influx of foreigners has been good for England? Both economically and socially?
No, there's currently clearly a problem with immigration. However, it's also not all bad by any means. Britain today is a much more vibrant, colourful and interesting place than it was in the 1950's.
The idea that a completely homogeneous population is better, as this guy seems to be implying, is simply not true. As with most things, moderation is a good idea.
You had the curries already in 1990.
England got better after that with EU immigration and much, much worse with middle eastern and south Asian migration. By which I mean Islamic immigration.
@jon-nyc said in According to Michael O'Keefe...:
You had the curries already in 1990.
England got better after that with EU immigration and much, much worse with middle eastern and south Asian migration. By which I mean Islamic immigration.
It's ironic that Brexit was sold as a solution to the immigration from Europe, which I agree improved the country no end. What's happened since then is definitely problematic, and the points based system that was introduced seems to have increased the number of immigrants, which presumably wasn't its intent.
