Trumpenomics
-
I wonder how folk here will cope with the forthcoming price increases, from coffee to pensions, with increasing unemployment and market uncertainty?
We're hardly wealthy baby boomers, owning for example two 10 year old cars; however we can absorb price inceases having annuities guaranteed for life, and full state pensions in a few years.
But what of our children who are relatively new to the job & housing markets, of our friends who are coming up to retirement, and people worldwide in places like Vietnam, Cambodia with manufactufing jobs etc.?
Promised US domestic manufacturing jobs will take years to create if they ever materialise. I reckon there must be significant buyer regret among Trump(CF) voters, who didn't realise the difference between his promises and reality.
What about the international rule of law built up after the chaos of WW2, now reduced to Might makes right.
America appears little better than Russia. Veto the UN, disregard ICC, threaten weaker countries. No consequences. Two totalitarian states facing off?@Jolly "I'm just sitting back, enjoying the show"
World ends Monday.
Women and children to suffer most.
I still like ol' Larry. And I still think you're an opportunistic pissant.The world is a far worse place because of Trump(CF), and yes, women and children will suffer more.
It's a shitshow, so just what the hell are you enjoying about it?
-
What happens to long-term supply contracts of imported goods with pre-negotiated prices?
The buyer points at the contract and says "I am not paying a penny more than what's written in the contract." The seller still has to pay 10%~99% more for tariffs as a matter of cost. What's the usual mechanisms to deal with something like this? Is there insurance that hedge for "sudden cost increases caused by government policies"?
-
So here’s the question you have to ask. Is Bessent (a Yale grad that went on to run Soros’ London office and ultimately became a partner before starting his own highly successful firm focused on global trading and macroeconomics) an absolute idiot and lucked his way into the wealth and positions he was in? Or is there something more at play?
The Brad
-
So here’s the question you have to ask. Is Bessent (a Yale grad that went on to run Soros’ London office and ultimately became a partner before starting his own highly successful firm focused on global trading and macroeconomics) an absolute idiot and lucked his way into the wealth and positions he was in? Or is there something more at play?
@LuFins-Dad said in Trumpenomics:
So here’s the question you have to ask. Is Bessent (a Yale grad that went on to run Soros’ London office and ultimately became a partner before starting his own highly successful firm focused on global trading and macroeconomics) an absolute idiot and lucked his way into the wealth and positions he was in? Or is there something more at play?
Well, if he disagrees with Trump he loses his job, so there's that.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Trumpenomics:
So here’s the question you have to ask. Is Bessent (a Yale grad that went on to run Soros’ London office and ultimately became a partner before starting his own highly successful firm focused on global trading and macroeconomics) an absolute idiot and lucked his way into the wealth and positions he was in? Or is there something more at play?
Well, if he disagrees with Trump he loses his job, so there's that.
@Doctor-Phibes said in Trumpenomics:
@LuFins-Dad said in Trumpenomics:
So here’s the question you have to ask. Is Bessent (a Yale grad that went on to run Soros’ London office and ultimately became a partner before starting his own highly successful firm focused on global trading and macroeconomics) an absolute idiot and lucked his way into the wealth and positions he was in? Or is there something more at play?
Well, if he disagrees with Trump he loses his job, so there's that.
The guy worth $500M is willing to risk losing all or most of that for the sake of a job that pays $250K per year? Is that seriously your argument?
The Brad
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Trumpenomics:
@LuFins-Dad said in Trumpenomics:
So here’s the question you have to ask. Is Bessent (a Yale grad that went on to run Soros’ London office and ultimately became a partner before starting his own highly successful firm focused on global trading and macroeconomics) an absolute idiot and lucked his way into the wealth and positions he was in? Or is there something more at play?
Well, if he disagrees with Trump he loses his job, so there's that.
The guy worth $500M is willing to risk losing all or most of that for the sake of a job that pays $250K per year? Is that seriously your argument?
@LuFins-Dad said in Trumpenomics:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Trumpenomics:
@LuFins-Dad said in Trumpenomics:
The guy worth $500M is willing to risk losing all or most of that for the sake of a job that pays $250K per year? Is that seriously your argument?
Well, another guy was willing to lose 100 Billion to work for free.
Though Musk seems to be firing people who might interfere with his James Bond villain plans for world and space domination. So there’s that…
-
I wonder how folk here will cope with the forthcoming price increases, from coffee to pensions, with increasing unemployment and market uncertainty?
We're hardly wealthy baby boomers, owning for example two 10 year old cars; however we can absorb price inceases having annuities guaranteed for life, and full state pensions in a few years.
But what of our children who are relatively new to the job & housing markets, of our friends who are coming up to retirement, and people worldwide in places like Vietnam, Cambodia with manufactufing jobs etc.?
Promised US domestic manufacturing jobs will take years to create if they ever materialise. I reckon there must be significant buyer regret among Trump(CF) voters, who didn't realise the difference between his promises and reality.
What about the international rule of law built up after the chaos of WW2, now reduced to Might makes right.
America appears little better than Russia. Veto the UN, disregard ICC, threaten weaker countries. No consequences. Two totalitarian states facing off?@Jolly "I'm just sitting back, enjoying the show"
World ends Monday.
Women and children to suffer most.
I still like ol' Larry. And I still think you're an opportunistic pissant.The world is a far worse place because of Trump(CF), and yes, women and children will suffer more.
It's a shitshow, so just what the hell are you enjoying about it?
@AndyD said in Trumpenomics:
I wonder how folk here will cope with the forthcoming price increases, from coffee to pensions, with increasing unemployment and market uncertainty?
We're hardly wealthy baby boomers, owning for example two 10 year old cars; however we can absorb price inceases having annuities guaranteed for life, and full state pensions in a few years.
But what of our children who are relatively new to the job & housing markets, of our friends who are coming up to retirement, and people worldwide in places like Vietnam, Cambodia with manufactufing jobs etc.?
Promised US domestic manufacturing jobs will take years to create if they ever materialise. I reckon there must be significant buyer regret among Trump(CF) voters, who didn't realise the difference between his promises and reality.
What about the international rule of law built up after the chaos of WW2, now reduced to Might makes right.
America appears little better than Russia. Veto the UN, disregard ICC, threaten weaker countries. No consequences. Two totalitarian states facing off?@Jolly "I'm just sitting back, enjoying the show"
World ends Monday.
Women and children to suffer most.
I still like ol' Larry. And I still think you're an opportunistic pissant.The world is a far worse place because of Trump(CF), and yes, women and children will suffer more.
It's a shitshow, so just what the hell are you enjoying about it?
No, the world is not worse because of Trump. The women and children quote is from a NYT gag, but you're probably not smart enough to know that.
And you don't have to enjoy the show, you can lay back and think of England, if you wish.
I'll give you some advice... Put not your faith in princes or principalities. Owe no man money. Never put all your financial eggs in one basket. Live on 75% of your take-home income. Try to create more than one revenue stream. Learn poor boy skills...how to cut a 5/12 rafter, how to patch a roof, wire an electrical outlet, change a set of disc brakes, grow a vegetable garden, how to lay a floor (wood, tile or other) and how to cook well on a limited budget. Treat relationships as relationships, and business as business.
Know that God laughs at men's plans and your control over your life is illusion.
Cinch up, take a dally and enjoy Life's ride...
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
So here’s the question you have to ask. Is Bessent (a Yale grad that went on to run Soros’ London office and ultimately became a partner before starting his own highly successful firm focused on global trading and macroeconomics) an absolute idiot and lucked his way into the wealth and positions he was in? Or is there something more at play?
@LuFins-Dad said in Trumpenomics:
So here’s the question you have to ask. Is Bessent (a Yale grad that went on to run Soros’ London office and ultimately became a partner before starting his own highly successful firm focused on global trading and macroeconomics) an absolute idiot and lucked his way into the wealth and positions he was in? Or is there something more at play?
It’s quite possible that one can apply Larry’s statement “educated beyond his intelligence” to the man.
That, and Copperhead’s oft stated platitude, “money makes you stupid”.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Trumpenomics:
@LuFins-Dad said in Trumpenomics:
So here’s the question you have to ask. Is Bessent (a Yale grad that went on to run Soros’ London office and ultimately became a partner before starting his own highly successful firm focused on global trading and macroeconomics) an absolute idiot and lucked his way into the wealth and positions he was in? Or is there something more at play?
Well, if he disagrees with Trump he loses his job, so there's that.
The guy worth $500M is willing to risk losing all or most of that for the sake of a job that pays $250K per year? Is that seriously your argument?
@LuFins-Dad said in Trumpenomics:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Trumpenomics:
@LuFins-Dad said in Trumpenomics:
So here’s the question you have to ask. Is Bessent (a Yale grad that went on to run Soros’ London office and ultimately became a partner before starting his own highly successful firm focused on global trading and macroeconomics) an absolute idiot and lucked his way into the wealth and positions he was in? Or is there something more at play?
Well, if he disagrees with Trump he loses his job, so there's that.
The guy worth $500M is willing to risk losing all or most of that for the sake of a job that pays $250K per year? Is that seriously your argument?
FFS, he's not doing the job for the money.
Do you honestly think all of Trump's cabinet agree with everything he's doing? If not, why aren't they speaking up? It's the job to agree with the boss.
You're essentially saying 'Yeah, this guy's really smart, so everything's OK, right?'
-
And of course, this could work out OK. I can't really see how unless Trump changes course, but I'm sure as hell no expert.
The real point is that Trump has no freaking idea what's going to happen. Anybody who thinks the government is safely in control of things is delusional. I said the same about Brexit - I'd rather have the current less-than-ideal situation than something completely unpredictable.
And sure, Trump's a risk-taker. But he's taking huge risks with our life savings, so fuck no.
-
Any story where permanent tariffs (until changed by a future administration) work out well, would be fanciful. But no such story is told. The best offerings are vague implications of Pleasantville, Middle America, with a beautiful new factory, and white picket fenced homes surrounding it, where the factory workers live with their 2.5 kids. But there's no serious story about how to get there. "Because tariffs" is not a serious story.
-
Any story where permanent tariffs (until changed by a future administration) work out well, would be fanciful. But no such story is told. The best offerings are vague implications of Pleasantville, Middle America, with a beautiful new factory, and white picket fenced homes surrounding it, where the factory workers live with their 2.5 kids. But there's no serious story about how to get there. "Because tariffs" is not a serious story.
@Horace said in Trumpenomics:
Any story where permanent tariffs (until changed by a future administration) work out well, would be fanciful. But no such story is told. The best offerings are vague implications of Pleasantville, Middle America, with a beautiful new factory, and white picket fenced homes surrounding it, where the factory workers live with their 2.5 kids. But there's no serious story about how to get there. "Because tariffs" is not a serious story.
All you have to do is replace the word 'tariff' with the word 'tax', and suddenly the entire policy looks quite ugly and ridiculous.
And the idea that other countries shouldn't or won't reciprocate 'if they know what's good for them' is ridiculous. He might have got away with bullying and ripping off his suppliers when he was in charge of his own business, but it's clearly not going to work here.
