The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Their War Plans
-
Tortured definitions are nothing new to anybody, and especially not in politics. Tulsi had a statement this morning before a committee on foreign threats (again not convened for this matter, but she addressed the elephant in the room). These are the talking points after a day to mull everything over. Explicit lies? Probably not, just tortured definitions.
At 39:00
Link to video
-
"Integrity" used to mean something to the Republicans. "Character" used to matter to the Republicans. Not anymore. So sad.
@Axtremus said in The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Their War Plans:
"Integrity" used to mean something to the Republicans. "Character" used to matter to the Republicans. Not anymore. So sad.
If someone is not actually sad, while they claim to be rhetorically sad, but rather they are happy to see their enemy embarrassing themselves, how does that reflect on their integrity?
-
@Horace said in The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Their War Plans:
Explicit lies? Probably not, just tortured definitions.
Miss the good old days of debating what the meaning of "is" is?
@Axtremus said in The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Their War Plans:
@Horace said in The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Their War Plans:
Explicit lies? Probably not, just tortured definitions.
Miss the good old days of debating what the meaning of "is" is?
Well, anybody who wants to get too precious about this, can reflect on that sort of history.
-
"Integrity" used to mean something to the Republicans. "Character" used to matter to the Republicans. Not anymore. So sad.
@Axtremus said in The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Their War Plans:
"Integrity" used to mean something to the Republicans. "Character" used to matter to the Republicans. Not anymore. So sad.
Oh, my giddy aunt...
We just got through with an entire party lying about the mental health of the President, then running a wine-soaked drunk for POTUS, people doing cocaine lines in the Whitehouse, storing Top Secret documents in a garage, and botching a military withdrawal causing 13 military personnel to die (shucks, that's just the lowlights off the top of my head)...and you're worried about a leak that meant little in the larger scheme of things occurring while the current administration is having to kill terrorists the Biden Administration would not?
-
In the end, like in most all matters of political law breaking, the extra crime of the cover up is what will become their demise. And here is clearly another matter of "how would the other side react?" You can be most assured that if this was a Democrat administration found with their lapse of security dick in their hand, the whole Republican propaganda network would be running this page 1 for the next year, calling for all of their heads. They would build this up into another mountain of poo and convince half this country that Democrats care nothing for the safety of our men in uniform and are in fact traitors to this country. Fox, of course, makes barely a mention of the incident since, leading all of MAGA to not even know what just fucking happened. They are the biggest perpetuators of alternate facts that push reality under the rug and thus create this great divide all for what? Yes, of course, it always comes to this in the end, GREED.
-
There hasnât been a cover up so much as a doubling down. Not that they wouldnât cover it up, they just canât because Goldberg has the receipts.
Interesting because some of these are actual Federal crimes. I wonder if Secretary Whiskileaks gets a preemptive pardon at some point.
Only non-witches get due process.
- Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
-
There hasnât been a cover up so much as a doubling down. Not that they wouldnât cover it up, they just canât because Goldberg has the receipts.
Interesting because some of these are actual Federal crimes. I wonder if Secretary Whiskileaks gets a preemptive pardon at some point.
-
He is an expert whattaboutter and would never have thought the Vindeman testimony (under subpoena and with counsel by his side advising him what he could and could not share) was sufficiently analogous to warrant wattaboutting in this thread.
Besides, canât you just point to Hilaryâs emails?
-
He is an expert whattaboutter and would never have thought the Vindeman testimony (under subpoena and with counsel by his side advising him what he could and could not share) was sufficiently analogous to warrant wattaboutting in this thread.
Besides, canât you just point to Hilaryâs emails?
