Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Shipbuilding "Tariff"

Shipbuilding "Tariff"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
12 Posts 7 Posters 67 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • RenaudaR Offline
    RenaudaR Offline
    Renauda
    wrote on last edited by Renauda
    #3

    Bad

    Elbows up!

    1 Reply Last reply
    • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

      https://www.reuters.com/business/trumps-shipbuilding-plan-could-upend-ocean-cargo-industry-companies-warn-2025-03-07/

      President Donald Trump's plan to revitalize the U.S. shipping industry could heap massive costs on ocean transport operators and spawn a new round of supply chain chaos around the world, executives told Reuters.

      Trump's administration aims to pay for an American shipbuilding comeback with help from potentially hefty port fees on Chinese-built vessels as well as ships from fleets with China-made vessels, according to a draft executive order seen by Reuters on Thursday.

      The levies could hit virtually every ship calling at U.S. ports, foist up to $30 billion of annual costs on American consumers and double the cost of shipping U.S. exports, according to the World Shipping Council (WSC), which represents the liner shipping industry.

      "Policymakers must reconsider these damaging proposals and seek alternative solutions that support American industries," WSC CEO Joe Kramek said.

      and

      In the near term, ship owners could make fewer U.S. port calls to limit fees. A flood of extra cargo could clog up those ports, making it harder to get imports to retailers and manufacturers and exports on ships, executives said.

      The Trump plan could also put pressure on companies to redeploy their global ship fleets so that vessels that weren't built in China are refocused on the United States market - something that could cost time and money, they said.

      MSC, world's largest container carrier, could skip smaller ports like California's Port of Oakland - an important gateway for exports of fresh beef, dairy products and almonds - to mitigate the impact, Soren Toft, the company's CEO said at TPM.

      Such moves could swamp the nation's biggest ports and freeze out the smaller ones, risking a repeat of early pandemic backups that hobbled global trade flows, executives warned.

      jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nyc
      wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
      #4

      @taiwan_girl said in Shipbuilding "Tariff":

      Such moves could swamp the nation's biggest ports and freeze out the smaller ones, risking a repeat of early pandemic backups that hobbled global trade flows, executives warned.

      It wouldn’t swamp the big ports. They’re all automated. Right?

      Right?

      Only non-witches get due process.

      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
      1 Reply Last reply
      • JollyJ Offline
        JollyJ Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        We have multiple problems...

        1. We don't have the specialized trades to build and maintain ships like we used to. We've had problems before, but we had more yard space back then. An interesting video on what happens when a major manufacturer ventures into building ships...

        Link to video

        1. We don't have the shipping capacity to engage in effective trade or to use out maritime fleet to transport troops, beans or bullets.

        2. We don't have enough ABS, engineers or officers to staff a robust commercial fleet.

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
        • kluursK Online
          kluursK Online
          kluurs
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          I posted this elsewhere - but relevant here. We aren't gonna catch up.

          Link to video

          1 Reply Last reply
          • JollyJ Offline
            JollyJ Offline
            Jolly
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            I don't think we have any intention of catching up. Shucks, the darn Italians are having to build frigates for us.

            I think what we're doing, is trying to have enough skilled workers and enough yard capacity, that we can build enough strategic assets to do what we need to do.

            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

            1 Reply Last reply
            • JollyJ Jolly

              We have multiple problems...

              1. We don't have the specialized trades to build and maintain ships like we used to. We've had problems before, but we had more yard space back then. An interesting video on what happens when a major manufacturer ventures into building ships...

              Link to video

              1. We don't have the shipping capacity to engage in effective trade or to use out maritime fleet to transport troops, beans or bullets.

              2. We don't have enough ABS, engineers or officers to staff a robust commercial fleet.

              AxtremusA Offline
              AxtremusA Offline
              Axtremus
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              @Jolly said in Shipbuilding "Tariff":

              We have multiple problems...

              1. We don't have the specialized trades to build and maintain ships like we used to. …

              2. We don't have the shipping capacity to engage in effective trade or to use out maritime fleet to transport troops, beans or bullets.

              3. We don't have enough ABS, engineers or officers to staff a robust commercial fleet.

              How do you go from these problems to tariff as the answer?

              JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
              • AxtremusA Axtremus

                @Jolly said in Shipbuilding "Tariff":

                We have multiple problems...

                1. We don't have the specialized trades to build and maintain ships like we used to. …

                2. We don't have the shipping capacity to engage in effective trade or to use out maritime fleet to transport troops, beans or bullets.

                3. We don't have enough ABS, engineers or officers to staff a robust commercial fleet.

                How do you go from these problems to tariff as the answer?

                JollyJ Offline
                JollyJ Offline
                Jolly
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                @Axtremus said in Shipbuilding "Tariff":

                @Jolly said in Shipbuilding "Tariff":

                We have multiple problems...

                1. We don't have the specialized trades to build and maintain ships like we used to. …

                2. We don't have the shipping capacity to engage in effective trade or to use out maritime fleet to transport troops, beans or bullets.

                3. We don't have enough ABS, engineers or officers to staff a robust commercial fleet.

                How do you go from these problems to tariff as the answer?

                Same reason you might tariff steel or food imports...Strategic goals.

                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                • CopperC Offline
                  CopperC Offline
                  Copper
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  A sure way to have dems hate boats, Mr. Trump likes them.

                  JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  • CopperC Copper

                    A sure way to have dems hate boats, Mr. Trump likes them.

                    JollyJ Offline
                    JollyJ Offline
                    Jolly
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    @Copper said in Shipbuilding "Tariff":

                    A sure way to have dems hate boats, Mr. Trump likes them.

                    Well...They kneeled for over eight minutes for George Floyd, but couldn't even stand up and clap for a kid fighting brain cancer, because Trump invited the young man to a SOTU. That speaks volumes about hate.

                    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • JollyJ Jolly

                      @Axtremus said in Shipbuilding "Tariff":

                      @Jolly said in Shipbuilding "Tariff":

                      We have multiple problems...

                      1. We don't have the specialized trades to build and maintain ships like we used to. …

                      2. We don't have the shipping capacity to engage in effective trade or to use out maritime fleet to transport troops, beans or bullets.

                      3. We don't have enough ABS, engineers or officers to staff a robust commercial fleet.

                      How do you go from these problems to tariff as the answer?

                      Same reason you might tariff steel or food imports...Strategic goals.

                      RenaudaR Offline
                      RenaudaR Offline
                      Renauda
                      wrote on last edited by Renauda
                      #12

                      @Jolly said in Shipbuilding "Tariff":

                      @Axtremus said in Shipbuilding "Tariff":

                      @Jolly said in Shipbuilding "Tariff":

                      We have multiple problems...

                      1. We don't have the specialized trades to build and maintain ships like we used to. …

                      2. We don't have the shipping capacity to engage in effective trade or to use out maritime fleet to transport troops, beans or bullets.

                      3. We don't have enough ABS, engineers or officers to staff a robust commercial fleet.

                      How do you go from these problems to tariff as the answer?

                      Same reason you might tariff steel or food imports...Strategic goals.

                      A nebulous response at best.

                      Elbows up!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups