To Be A Coward
-
@Jolly said in To Be A Coward:
Can NYC get rid of Bragg?
At the next election. His predecessor (Vance) had that job for 12 years. His predecessor (Morgenthau) had it for 34 years.
Vance is the son of the former Secretary of State.
Morgenthau was the son of the former Secretary of Treasury. -
@Jolly said in To Be A Coward:
Congressional medal?
Nah, President-Elect Trump will appoint him to the cabinet.
-
@Mik said in To Be A Coward:
Gosh you mean people on the internet don’t know what they’re talking about?
Except for us on this forum board!
-
@Mik said in To Be A Coward:
@Jolly said in To Be A Coward:
Can NYC get rid of Bragg?
Sure. Make him ride the subway.
lol
-
@Mik said in To Be A Coward:
Gosh you mean people on the internet don’t know what they’re talking about?
Except for us on this forum board!
@taiwan_girl said in To Be A Coward:
@Mik said in To Be A Coward:
Gosh you mean people on the internet don’t know what they’re talking about?
Except for us on this forum board!
Not everybody on this board knows what they are talking about.
I won't name names. There is too much at stake.
-
So this means we’re allowed to randomly start choking out homeless black people on subways, right?
-
-
No commentator I've heard on this case can come up with a reasonable explanation for why a jury could be hung on the more severe charge but unanimously not-guilty on the charge with a lower standard of proof. Of course, the juror(s) who wanted guilty on Manslaughter might have just been sick of deliberating, or got emotional or petulant for whatever reason, but there's no logic to this otherwise.
-
No commentator I've heard on this case can come up with a reasonable explanation for why a jury could be hung on the more severe charge but unanimously not-guilty on the charge with a lower standard of proof. Of course, the juror(s) who wanted guilty on Manslaughter might have just been sick of deliberating, or got emotional or petulant for whatever reason, but there's no logic to this otherwise.
@Horace said in To Be A Coward:
No commentator I've heard on this case can come up with a reasonable explanation for why a jury could be hung on the more severe charge but unanimously not-guilty on the charge with a lower standard of proof. Of course, the juror(s) who wanted guilty on Manslaughter might have just been sick of deliberating, or got emotional or petulant for whatever reason, but there's no logic to this otherwise.
I meant to answer this earlier. If there was a lone wolf or two in the room pushing for conviction, they may have realized it was a lost cause. Especially after going home for the weekend, getting out of the deliberations for a few days… It’s also very possible that they heard from family or saw enough news to make them reconsider.
Of course, it’s most likely that they came to the conclusion that if they didn’t vote to acquit, then those filthy white supremacists on the jury would leak their info to other white supremacists and they would be in danger, and for no good reason since Penny would never serve time in jail.
-
