Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The Hegseth "incident."

The Hegseth "incident."

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
183 Posts 14 Posters 5.7k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Offline
    JollyJ Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on last edited by
    #46

    Epic collapse, no argument. Bad candidate replaced by worse candidate.

    But...Has there ever been a candidate for POTUS that...

    1. Had been defeated in his reelection bid?
    2. That had been impeached twice?
    3. That had a Whitehouse coordinated lawfare campaign ran against him, starting when he left office?
    4. That was pilloried by a House "investigative" committee in Prime Time?
    5. That was outspent during the campaign 3:1?
    6. That had 90% of the media arraigned against him?

    You can one or two of those in other successful bids, but I don't think you can
    get a majority, let alone all.

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    1 Reply Last reply
    • HoraceH Offline
      HoraceH Offline
      Horace
      wrote on last edited by Horace
      #47

      Right guy, right time, but the same can be said for many historically important figures. You could make a case that Trump is the right candidate for generations of people educated on the internet. Now, the left would say that that means it's all because of mis and disinformation, but I would say it's because the internet has shown the mainstream elite class to be posers who can't actually back up their pretensions of being the educated adults in the room, regardless of how much they believe that.

      Was talking to my mom yesterday and she was telling me about one of her friends in her elderly white female friend group. Big leftist, big Trump hater. She's the educated one, she's the smart one, all the Trump supporters are idiotic conspiracy theorists. You can't even parody these people, because they all live the parody, and they are everywhere. When we moved here, the first neighbor couple we got to know, the wife was entirely that person. Just pure sneering in all political issues, against the right. The degree to which this repulsive condescension became the mainstream, unashamed personality of the left, it's just magnificent. That stuff will have to be unwound, if they would like to win elections going forward.

      Education is extremely important.

      JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
      • HoraceH Horace

        Right guy, right time, but the same can be said for many historically important figures. You could make a case that Trump is the right candidate for generations of people educated on the internet. Now, the left would say that that means it's all because of mis and disinformation, but I would say it's because the internet has shown the mainstream elite class to be posers who can't actually back up their pretensions of being the educated adults in the room, regardless of how much they believe that.

        Was talking to my mom yesterday and she was telling me about one of her friends in her elderly white female friend group. Big leftist, big Trump hater. She's the educated one, she's the smart one, all the Trump supporters are idiotic conspiracy theorists. You can't even parody these people, because they all live the parody, and they are everywhere. When we moved here, the first neighbor couple we got to know, the wife was entirely that person. Just pure sneering in all political issues, against the right. The degree to which this repulsive condescension became the mainstream, unashamed personality of the left, it's just magnificent. That stuff will have to be unwound, if they would like to win elections going forward.

        JollyJ Offline
        JollyJ Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on last edited by
        #48

        @Horace said in The Hegseth "incident.":

        The degree to which this repulsive condescension became the mainstream, unashamed personality of the left, it's just magnificent. That stuff will have to be unwound, if they would like to win elections going forward.

        Amen.

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        1 Reply Last reply
        • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

          Was the Trump campaign the biggest comeback ever? Or was it one of the biggest collapses by the Dems ever?

          jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nyc
          wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
          #49

          @LuFins-Dad said in The Hegseth "incident.":

          Was the Trump campaign the biggest comeback ever? Or was it one of the biggest collapses by the Dems ever?

          Neither.

          Recall Nixon not only lost in 60, he then lost statewide election in CA. Everybody, including Nixon himself, wrote off his future political career.

          As for the Dems, they suffered a clear loss but put it in historical perspective- Trump’s win was the 44th biggest electoral college victory out of the 60 we’ve had. That’s like 75th percentile.

          Only non-witches get due process.

          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
          HoraceH LuFins DadL George KG 89th8 4 Replies Last reply
          • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

            @LuFins-Dad said in The Hegseth "incident.":

            Was the Trump campaign the biggest comeback ever? Or was it one of the biggest collapses by the Dems ever?

            Neither.

            Recall Nixon not only lost in 60, he then lost statewide election in CA. Everybody, including Nixon himself, wrote off his future political career.

            As for the Dems, they suffered a clear loss but put it in historical perspective- Trump’s win was the 44th biggest electoral college victory out of the 60 we’ve had. That’s like 75th percentile.

            HoraceH Offline
            HoraceH Offline
            Horace
            wrote on last edited by
            #50

            @jon-nyc said in The Hegseth "incident.":

            @LuFins-Dad said in The Hegseth "incident.":

            Was the Trump campaign the biggest comeback ever? Or was it one of the biggest collapses by the Dems ever?

            Neither.

            Recall Nixon not only lost in 60, he then lost statewide election in CA. Everybody, including Nixon himself, wrote off his future political career.

            As for the Dems, they suffered a clear loss but put it in historical perspective- Trump’s win was the 44th biggest electoral college victory out of the 60 we’ve had. That’s like 75th percentile.

            Yeah, but, as your side is fond of saying, he's Donald Trump. Imagine the headwinds he faces in the minds of every sane human being, and then to still get a 75th percentile win. That should be impressive, all the moreso as one's own opinion of Trump decreases.

            Education is extremely important.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nyc
              wrote on last edited by
              #51

              Look at you, the soft bigotry of low expectations.

              Only non-witches get due process.

              • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
              HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                Look at you, the soft bigotry of low expectations.

                HoraceH Offline
                HoraceH Offline
                Horace
                wrote on last edited by
                #52

                @jon-nyc said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                Look at you, the soft bigotry of low expectations.

                Of whom do I have low expectations? I made a claim to the psychologies of those who hate Trump, and how that should make them more impressed with his win. That claim isn't based on expectations, it's based on what those people say.

                Education is extremely important.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                  @LuFins-Dad said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                  Was the Trump campaign the biggest comeback ever? Or was it one of the biggest collapses by the Dems ever?

                  Neither.

                  Recall Nixon not only lost in 60, he then lost statewide election in CA. Everybody, including Nixon himself, wrote off his future political career.

                  As for the Dems, they suffered a clear loss but put it in historical perspective- Trump’s win was the 44th biggest electoral college victory out of the 60 we’ve had. That’s like 75th percentile.

                  LuFins DadL Offline
                  LuFins DadL Offline
                  LuFins Dad
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #53

                  @jon-nyc you’re trying to quantify the rhetorical. Did DJT overcome 2 impeachments, multiple felony indictments and an almost conviction of 36 counts, a civil sexual assault litigation, and being labeled an insurrectionist and literal Hitler because he’s so incredible? Or did people elect him because they thought the alternative was even worse?

                  The Brad

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • taiwan_girlT Offline
                    taiwan_girlT Offline
                    taiwan_girl
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #54

                    Regarding the Sec. of Defense - still not sure why people with TDS (Trump Deification Syndrome) think he is a qualified candidate? (regardless of "well, so and so was Secretary and had no qualifications")

                    In any normal organization, picking someone from his level and trying to make him CEO would be laughed at.

                    JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                      @LuFins-Dad said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                      Was the Trump campaign the biggest comeback ever? Or was it one of the biggest collapses by the Dems ever?

                      Neither.

                      Recall Nixon not only lost in 60, he then lost statewide election in CA. Everybody, including Nixon himself, wrote off his future political career.

                      As for the Dems, they suffered a clear loss but put it in historical perspective- Trump’s win was the 44th biggest electoral college victory out of the 60 we’ve had. That’s like 75th percentile.

                      George KG Offline
                      George KG Offline
                      George K
                      wrote on last edited by George K
                      #55

                      @jon-nyc said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                      Trump’s win was the 44th biggest electoral college victory out of the 60 we’ve had.

                      And in 2016, his margin of victory (in electoral votes) was greater than Biden's in 2020 (77 vs 74) , and only 7 less than JFK (77 vs 84). Looks like 2024 will be the more than JFK.

                      Screenshot 2024-11-25 at 10.58.35 AM.png

                      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                      jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                      • HoraceH Offline
                        HoraceH Offline
                        Horace
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #56

                        I only learned this election that electoral vote numbers per state, change every year.

                        Education is extremely important.

                        LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                        • HoraceH Horace

                          I only learned this election that electoral vote numbers per state, change every year.

                          LuFins DadL Offline
                          LuFins DadL Offline
                          LuFins Dad
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #57

                          @Horace said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                          I only learned this election that electoral vote numbers per state, change every year.

                          Not every year, every census.

                          The Brad

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                            Regarding the Sec. of Defense - still not sure why people with TDS (Trump Deification Syndrome) think he is a qualified candidate? (regardless of "well, so and so was Secretary and had no qualifications")

                            In any normal organization, picking someone from his level and trying to make him CEO would be laughed at.

                            JollyJ Offline
                            JollyJ Offline
                            Jolly
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #58

                            @taiwan_girl said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                            Regarding the Sec. of Defense - still not sure why people with TDS (Trump Deification Syndrome) think he is a qualified candidate? (regardless of "well, so and so was Secretary and had no qualifications")

                            In any normal organization, picking someone from his level and trying to make him CEO would be laughed at.

                            In any normal organization, you're not choosing from an incestual talent pool.

                            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                            taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
                            • JollyJ Jolly

                              @taiwan_girl said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                              Regarding the Sec. of Defense - still not sure why people with TDS (Trump Deification Syndrome) think he is a qualified candidate? (regardless of "well, so and so was Secretary and had no qualifications")

                              In any normal organization, picking someone from his level and trying to make him CEO would be laughed at.

                              In any normal organization, you're not choosing from an incestual talent pool.

                              taiwan_girlT Offline
                              taiwan_girlT Offline
                              taiwan_girl
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #59

                              @Jolly I agree with you.

                              But I think if Senators looked at this with ration, it would be much better. Tell the President to be that this candidate just is not qualfied. Dont make us reject him.

                              (yes yes yes yes, both sides are guilty. If VP Harris won, and she nominated a Sec. of Defense with the same qualifications, all the Dem senators would be talking about how great he was.)

                              At some point, putting blind loyalty in front of good of the country is not a good thing.

                              HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
                              • George KG George K

                                @jon-nyc said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                                Trump’s win was the 44th biggest electoral college victory out of the 60 we’ve had.

                                And in 2016, his margin of victory (in electoral votes) was greater than Biden's in 2020 (77 vs 74) , and only 7 less than JFK (77 vs 84). Looks like 2024 will be the more than JFK.

                                Screenshot 2024-11-25 at 10.58.35 AM.png

                                jon-nycJ Offline
                                jon-nycJ Offline
                                jon-nyc
                                wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                                #60

                                @George-K said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                                @jon-nyc said in The Hegseth "incident.":(in electoral votes)...

                                Not a valid comparator over time as the number of total EVs has increased.

                                Only non-witches get due process.

                                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                George KG 2 Replies Last reply
                                • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                                  @Jolly I agree with you.

                                  But I think if Senators looked at this with ration, it would be much better. Tell the President to be that this candidate just is not qualfied. Dont make us reject him.

                                  (yes yes yes yes, both sides are guilty. If VP Harris won, and she nominated a Sec. of Defense with the same qualifications, all the Dem senators would be talking about how great he was.)

                                  At some point, putting blind loyalty in front of good of the country is not a good thing.

                                  HoraceH Offline
                                  HoraceH Offline
                                  Horace
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #61

                                  @taiwan_girl said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                                  @Jolly I agree with you.

                                  But I think if Senators looked at this with ration, it would be much better. Tell the President to be that this candidate just is not qualfied. Dont make us reject him.

                                  (yes yes yes yes, both sides are guilty. If VP Harris won, and she nominated a Sec. of Defense with the same qualifications, all the Dem senators would be talking about how great he was.)

                                  At some point, putting blind loyalty in front of good of the country is not a good thing.

                                  Corporations are judged by easily quantifiable measures of success. There is no such measuring stick for government organizations, and that fact complicates the selection process of the employees at every level, including the top. We can say that a bad CEO will be bad for the corporate profits. What can we actually say about a "bad secretary of defense"? Some hand waving about geopolitical stuff that armchair generals have lots of opinions about?

                                  Education is extremely important.

                                  taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
                                  • HoraceH Horace

                                    @taiwan_girl said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                                    @Jolly I agree with you.

                                    But I think if Senators looked at this with ration, it would be much better. Tell the President to be that this candidate just is not qualfied. Dont make us reject him.

                                    (yes yes yes yes, both sides are guilty. If VP Harris won, and she nominated a Sec. of Defense with the same qualifications, all the Dem senators would be talking about how great he was.)

                                    At some point, putting blind loyalty in front of good of the country is not a good thing.

                                    Corporations are judged by easily quantifiable measures of success. There is no such measuring stick for government organizations, and that fact complicates the selection process of the employees at every level, including the top. We can say that a bad CEO will be bad for the corporate profits. What can we actually say about a "bad secretary of defense"? Some hand waving about geopolitical stuff that armchair generals have lots of opinions about?

                                    taiwan_girlT Offline
                                    taiwan_girlT Offline
                                    taiwan_girl
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #62

                                    @Horace Part of the problem is that most government appointed positions like the one we are talking about force the leader to be very short term focused because they know they are gone after just a few years and really have no accountability for their actions.

                                    "Oh, I did this and it resulted in this immediate positive impact" Even though in five years it is a major problem and the initial thing never should have been done.

                                    Good CEO's have the ability to think longer term. (Yes, they are also watching the stock price on a day to day basis........ LOL)

                                    JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                    • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                                      @Horace Part of the problem is that most government appointed positions like the one we are talking about force the leader to be very short term focused because they know they are gone after just a few years and really have no accountability for their actions.

                                      "Oh, I did this and it resulted in this immediate positive impact" Even though in five years it is a major problem and the initial thing never should have been done.

                                      Good CEO's have the ability to think longer term. (Yes, they are also watching the stock price on a day to day basis........ LOL)

                                      JollyJ Offline
                                      JollyJ Offline
                                      Jolly
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #63

                                      @taiwan_girl said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                                      @Horace Part of the problem is that most government appointed positions like the one we are talking about force the leader to be very short term focused because they know they are gone after just a few years and really have no accountability for their actions.

                                      "Oh, I did this and it resulted in this immediate positive impact" Even though in five years it is a major problem and the initial thing never should have been done.

                                      Good CEO's have the ability to think longer term. (Yes, they are also watching the stock price on a day to day basis........ LOL)

                                      The U.S. military is not a corporation. Any sane corporation would have cut its expenses and fed Taiwan to the Chinese Dragon a long time ago.

                                      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                                        @George-K said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                                        @jon-nyc said in The Hegseth "incident.":(in electoral votes)...

                                        Not a valid comparator over time as the number of total EVs has increased.

                                        George KG Offline
                                        George KG Offline
                                        George K
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #64

                                        @jon-nyc said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                                        @George-K said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                                        @jon-nyc said in The Hegseth "incident.":(in electoral votes)...

                                        Not a valid comparator over time as the number of total EVs has increased.

                                        Are you saying that Biden‘s margin of victory in 2020 should be discounted?

                                        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                        jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                        • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                                          @George-K said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                                          @jon-nyc said in The Hegseth "incident.":(in electoral votes)...

                                          Not a valid comparator over time as the number of total EVs has increased.

                                          George KG Offline
                                          George KG Offline
                                          George K
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #65

                                          @jon-nyc said in The Hegseth "incident.":

                                          Not a valid comparator over time as the number of total EVs has increased.

                                          Since 1912, the number of electors has risen by 7.

                                          Screenshot 2024-11-25 at 12.09.10 PM.png

                                          Still a greater margin than Bush (twice), Carter, and Biden.

                                          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups