Interesting thread on potential Article II issues
-
-
Civil Service Protections… Long past time for these to be stripped…
-
Inspector Generals… Pass the popcorn
-
Regarding the FBI Background checks, Article II takes priority and precedence. The FBI background checks were a legal nicety observed at a time when the FBI carried a level of trust in the public eye that they no longer enjoy. That’s an easy obstacle for the new administration.
-
Absolutely, he can.
9-10-11) DOGE - Pass the popcorn…
The Brad
-
-
-
Civil Service Protections… Long past time for these to be stripped…
-
Inspector Generals… Pass the popcorn
-
Regarding the FBI Background checks, Article II takes priority and precedence. The FBI background checks were a legal nicety observed at a time when the FBI carried a level of trust in the public eye that they no longer enjoy. That’s an easy obstacle for the new administration.
-
Absolutely, he can.
9-10-11) DOGE - Pass the popcorn…
@LuFins-Dad said in Interesting thread on potential Article II issues:
- Regarding the FBI Background checks, Article II takes priority and precedence. The FBI background checks were a legal nicety observed at a time when the FBI carried a level of trust in the public eye that they no longer enjoy.
He’s not skipping FBI checks for Tulsi et al because they won’t do a good job. He’s skipping it because they will.
-
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Interesting thread on potential Article II issues:
- Regarding the FBI Background checks, Article II takes priority and precedence. The FBI background checks were a legal nicety observed at a time when the FBI carried a level of trust in the public eye that they no longer enjoy.
He’s not skipping FBI checks for Tulsi et al because they won’t do a good job. He’s skipping it because they will.
@jon-nyc said in Interesting thread on potential Article II issues:
@LuFins-Dad said in Interesting thread on potential Article II issues:
- Regarding the FBI Background checks, Article II takes priority and precedence. The FBI background checks were a legal nicety observed at a time when the FBI carried a level of trust in the public eye that they no longer enjoy.
He’s not skipping FBI checks for Tulsi et al because they won’t do a good job. He’s skipping it because they will.
That’s your opinion. Great. However, we have seen so many abject failures, lies, and conspiracies perpetrated by the FBI that the general public will not truly believe anything they find. The trust in the Bureau is lost. And it will be quite some time for them to regain it and regain relevancy.
-
@jon-nyc said in Interesting thread on potential Article II issues:
@LuFins-Dad said in Interesting thread on potential Article II issues:
- Regarding the FBI Background checks, Article II takes priority and precedence. The FBI background checks were a legal nicety observed at a time when the FBI carried a level of trust in the public eye that they no longer enjoy.
He’s not skipping FBI checks for Tulsi et al because they won’t do a good job. He’s skipping it because they will.
That’s your opinion. Great. However, we have seen so many abject failures, lies, and conspiracies perpetrated by the FBI that the general public will not truly believe anything they find. The trust in the Bureau is lost. And it will be quite some time for them to regain it and regain relevancy.
@LuFins-Dad said in Interesting thread on potential Article II issues:
However, we have seen so many abject failures, lies, and conspiracies perpetrated by the FBI that the general public will not truly believe anything they find.
You should repeat that 51 times.
