Flawless Campaign
-
Interesting note from the exit polls was while 35% of voters listed “Democracy” as their number one concern, Trump actually won those voters in swing states.
The Brad
-
The problem wasn’t either campaign. It was the three years preceding it.
@LuFins-Dad said in Flawless Campaign:
The problem wasn’t either campaign. It was the three years preceding it.
I don't see how this is provable one way or the other, but it seems dubious to believe the campaign didn't matter.
-
Interesting note from the exit polls was while 35% of voters listed “Democracy” as their number one concern, Trump actually won those voters in swing states.
@LuFins-Dad said in Flawless Campaign:
Interesting note from the exit polls was while 35% of voters listed “Democracy” as their number one concern, Trump actually won those voters in swing states.
That is interesting
-
I didn't think the campaign was the problem. The problem was Biden leaving it too late to drop out so that the primaries appeared bogus, and then they stuck in a candidate who had zero personal charm or charisma, and as far as I could tell not much in the way of real beliefs.
Other than that, it was great.
@Doctor-Phibes said in Flawless Campaign:
they stuck in a candidate who had zero personal charm or charisma, and as far as I could tell not much in the way of real beliefs.
Agree. From the very beginning, our small "cross section" here on this forum were pretty much in agreement that she was not a very good candidate.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Flawless Campaign:
they stuck in a candidate who had zero personal charm or charisma, and as far as I could tell not much in the way of real beliefs.
Agree. From the very beginning, our small "cross section" here on this forum were pretty much in agreement that she was not a very good candidate.
@taiwan_girl said in Flawless Campaign:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Flawless Campaign:
they stuck in a candidate who had zero personal charm or charisma, and as far as I could tell not much in the way of real beliefs.
Agree. From the very beginning, our small "cross section" here on this forum were pretty much in agreement that she was not a very good candidate.
She lost to a guy who couldn't handle been beaten by a guy who beat him by campaigning from his basement.
-
@taiwan_girl said in Flawless Campaign:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Flawless Campaign:
they stuck in a candidate who had zero personal charm or charisma, and as far as I could tell not much in the way of real beliefs.
Agree. From the very beginning, our small "cross section" here on this forum were pretty much in agreement that she was not a very good candidate.
She lost to a guy who couldn't handle been beaten by a guy who beat him by campaigning from his basement.
@Doctor-Phibes said in Flawless Campaign:
She lost to a guy who couldn't handle been beaten by a guy who beat him by campaigning from his basement.
And she got fewer votes than Biden got in 2020 in every county.
Winner!
-
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/how-kamala-harris-plowed-through-1-billion/ar-AA1tJR0M
There was $1 million for Oprah Winfrey's Harpo Productions on Oct. 15 in West Hollywood, California.
-
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/how-kamala-harris-plowed-through-1-billion/ar-AA1tJR0M
There was $1 million for Oprah Winfrey's Harpo Productions on Oct. 15 in West Hollywood, California.
@George-K said in Flawless Campaign:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/how-kamala-harris-plowed-through-1-billion/ar-AA1tJR0M
There was $1 million for Oprah Winfrey's Harpo Productions on Oct. 15 in West Hollywood, California.
7 times the payroll of Trump's campaign. Hiring rallygoers must be expensive.
-
Wait, they paid $15 Million to the companies providing the star endorsements?
The Brad
-
-
Wait, they paid $15 Million to the companies providing the star endorsements?
@LuFins-Dad Thought the stars didn't get any money?
That's what we were told...
-
-
-
@George-K said in Flawless Campaign:
:spittake: I never even considered that… Brilliant and thought provoking…
